View Full Version : Office 2008 for Mac SP2 improves speed and stability
AppleInsider
07-20-2009, 09:20 AM
Microsoft is set to release its second service pack for Office 2008 on Mac, bringing improved stability, speed, and new features, such as increased connectivity with the Web-based Office Live Workspace.
In a statement issued Monday, Microsoft said the Office 2008 for Mac Service Pack 2 focused on three specific areas: speed, stability and compatibility.
The Redmond, Wash., company said a recent study indicated that the top use of Office for Mac is sharing documents. To that end, the Document Connection feature allows users to save and open Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents on Microsoft Office Live Workspace. The service also includes expanded browser support on the Mac for Safari 4.
The update was released Monday on Microsoft's Office 2008 for Mac Web site.
"There's never been a better time to try Office 2008 for Mac -- with SP2 we are not only delivering on top customer requests midcycle, but also taking a first step in bringing Microsoft software plus services to Mac users," said Mike Tedesco, senior product manager for the Mac Business Unit at Microsoft. "This connection unlocks the door for Mac users to Microsoft services for easier collaboration and file sharing with colleagues, customers and classmates."
The update also improves SharePoint, which allows users to collaborate on documents. SP2 simplifies how users browse, access and manage files, both online and offline.
SP2 also features increased launch speed and quicker scroll response times in Word 2008, and faster calculation performance in Excel 2008.
Two "highly requested features" for PowerPoint 2008 have also been added: Custom path animation and default theme.
"SP2 delivers highly requested features throughout the suite as well as a new tool, Document Connection for Mac, that helps improve access and browsing to documents on SharePoint Products and Technologies and Microsoft Office Live Workspace," the Microsoft press release states. "These new improvements and features are part of Microsoft's long-standing investment in delivering excellent cross-platform collaboration and compatibility for Mac users, and the commitment has paid off."
Originally released in January of 2008, Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac saw its first service pack released only a few months after its launch.[ View this article at AppleInsider.com ] (http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=11559)
tpf1952
07-20-2009, 09:27 AM
Probably not, but improved scrolling would be nice. Anything to make Office a little snappier.
How about having the Spaces bug fixed? It is downright annoying that things are not always where they are assigned.
godrifle
07-20-2009, 10:00 AM
"SP2 also features increased launch and scroll times in Word 2008"
I hope not. :lol:
davebarnes
07-20-2009, 10:00 AM
"top use of Office for Mac is sharing documents."
TRUE as all documents are shared. I mean, who writes just for themselves?
"To that end, the Document Connection feature allows users to save and open Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents on Microsoft Office Live Workspace."
Why would I want to do that?
Share means to email the Word doc to a co-worker or customer.
Who (besides Microsoft) gives a damn about Office Live Workspace?
DanaCameron
07-20-2009, 10:03 AM
I'm still sticking with iWork. When I share documents with others, I send PDFs.
aduzik
07-20-2009, 10:06 AM
"top use of Office for Mac is sharing documents."
TRUE as all documents are shared. I mean, who writes just for themselves?
"To that end, the Document Connection feature allows users to save and open Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents on Microsoft Office Live Workspace."
Why would I want to do that?
Share means to email the Word doc to a co-worker or customer.
Who (besides Microsoft) gives a damn about Office Live Workspace?
I do. The Document Connection feature makes Office 2008 compatible with SharePoint, and a huge (and increasing) number of companies are using SharePoint to collaborate. Before today, it was embarassing to have to tell our Mac-heavy clients that, instead of the nice, integrated SharePoint experience Office 2007 users get, their Mac users would have to keep a web browser open just to open and save documents.
I also have helped a couple of nonprofits set up and use Office Live Workspace to share documents, and this has caused pretty significant irritation for their Mac users, too.
In my opinion, this is the most important feature of SP2.
alansky
07-20-2009, 10:09 AM
The real question is whether users of Office 2008 will be able to install the update. On the Mac side, at least, the Office 2008 autoupdater has a nasty bug that frequently refuses to install the latest updates after downloading them, telling the user that a valid copy of Office 2008 can't be found. The only fix I am aware of involves reinstalling the entire Office 2008 suite, but it's not a real fix, actually. Next time there's an update... You guessed it! Perhaps one of these days, an Office 2008 update will fix this problem... if I can install the update!
nadyne
07-20-2009, 10:20 AM
How about having the Spaces bug fixed? It is downright annoying that things are not always where they are assigned.
Make sure that you've updated to 10.5.7. Apple made several fixes to their window management code that improves Spaces support for all Carbon apps.
The real question is whether users of Office 2008 will be able to install the update. On the Mac side, at least, the Office 2008 autoupdater has a nasty bug that frequently refuses to install the latest updates after downloading them, telling the user that a valid copy of Office 2008 can't be found. The only fix I am aware of involves reinstalling the entire Office 2008 suite, but it's not a real fix, actually. Next time there's an update... You guessed it! Perhaps one of these days, an Office 2008 update will fix this problem... if I can install the update!
The most common reasons for not being able to install the update are:
1. You've moved your Office 2008 folder out of Applications. If you've done this, all you need to do is move it back.
2. You've manually removed a file in the Office 2008 folder. If you've done this, you will need to uninstall Office and reinstall it. If there's something in standard installation of Office that you don't want to install, make sure that you do a custom install so that you can select what you want.
3. You've run an application like Monolingual or Xslimmer. If you've done this, you'll also need to uninstall and reinstall it. Do a custom install so that you save the MB that the language files take up, and make sure to exclude the Office folder if you run one of those apps again.
Regards,
Nadyne.
jrandersoniii
07-20-2009, 10:27 AM
And the world yawns collectively. Microsoft should be ashamed for this collective piece of crap they call Office 2008. While I left it on, I find myself using iWork when I can, or running Office 2007 for windoze when needed. I would rather reboot into bootcamp or run in a virtual environment than run Mac Office 2008.
That is money I will never get back.
Back to my initial point... never mind... MS has demonstrated that they are incapable of being ashamed of anything.
Nanotech
07-20-2009, 10:42 AM
Powerpoint custom paths? Finally, I had that in office 03 :\ I hope that they fixed the problem of assigning a theme to just one slide (I think then the remedy was to select two slides, apply the theme, and then delete one). Looking forward to this update, hope it feels snappier ;)
djames42
07-20-2009, 10:52 AM
I'm still sticking with iWork. When I share documents with others, I send PDFs.
While I left it on, I find myself using iWork when I can, or running Office 2007 for windoze when needed. I would rather reboot into bootcamp or run in a virtual environment than run Mac Office 2008.
Likewise, I have Office 2008 on my work machine because I need Entourage to speak to the Exchange server. Otherwise, I use combinations of iWork and NeoOffice. This update may encourage me to try using Word and Excel again (I'll never use PowerPoint as Keynote makes it look like a joke).
I do. The Document Connection feature makes Office 2008 compatible with SharePoint, and a huge (and increasing) number of companies are using SharePoint to collaborate. Before today, it was embarassing to have to tell our Mac-heavy clients that, instead of the nice, integrated SharePoint experience Office 2007 users get, their Mac users would have to keep a web browser open just to open and save documents.
Oh dear God, please don't encourage the use of the atrocity that is SharePoint. We're using it at my company, primarily because the person who makes these decisions thinks anything that comes out of Redmond is wonderful. We've got people working hard to hack the thing to death to give it a reasonable amount of security.
Had this woman pulled her head out and actually taken a look at the alternatives, we'd probably be using Plone and have better cross-platform support, security and flexibility.
The update also improves SharePoint, which allows users to collaborate on documents. SP2 simplifies how users browse, access and manage files, both online and offline.
I don't see how this is possible. All of the SP sites I've seen look like crap when viewed with anything other than IE. Perhaps SP2 will improve publishing to SP on the Mac, but it won't do anything to allow me to navigate to find what I'm looking for.
libertyforall
07-20-2009, 11:02 AM
Hmm, so where is MS Project?! Discontinued since Mac OS 9... *sigh*
Does this update add the ability to digitally sign MS Word documents? I could not seem to find that feature in help, except for Entourage...
djames42
07-20-2009, 11:32 AM
Hmm, so where is MS Project?! Discontinued since Mac OS 9... *sigh*
It's called OmniPlan (http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omniplan/) :)
beingnickb
07-20-2009, 11:55 AM
Oh dear God, please don't encourage the use of the atrocity that is SharePoint. We're using it at my company, primarily because the person who makes these decisions thinks anything that comes out of Redmond is wonderful. We've got people working hard to hack the thing to death to give it a reasonable amount of security.
Had this woman pulled her head out and actually taken a look at the alternatives, we'd probably be using Plone and have better cross-platform support, security and flexibility.
I don't see how this is possible. All of the SP sites I've seen look like crap when viewed with anything other than IE. Perhaps SP2 will improve publishing to SP on the Mac, but it won't do anything to allow me to navigate to find what I'm looking for.
We use SharePoint at a well known wireless company. It works quickly and securely and I use Firefox all the time. So either my company hacked it, or your company did not implement it correctly.
Tauron
07-20-2009, 11:56 AM
There is nothing MS can do to Office to make it better than iWork. The technology gap is so enormous that the only way MS can catch up is to build a new Office from scratch and employ 1000 engineers to do it.
Macs_since_1984
07-20-2009, 11:59 AM
[QUOTE=AppleInsider;1451219]Microsoft is set to release its second service pack for Office 2008 on Mac,
I made the mistake of getting the expensive media edition of Office 2008.
I use Word a lot and it kept crashing when trying to save, thus losing my work.
I gave away my Office 2008 (with a warning) and bought a copy of Office 2004 which is used if iWork and NeoOffice are not compatible enough.
Microsoft has garbage software cluttered with thousands of things few, if any, users need.
When Office 2004 no longer work at some point, I'll just use iWork, NeoOffice or whatever some non-Microsoft developer offers.
tyrnight
07-20-2009, 12:27 PM
its 1:26 EST and it still doesn't show up on the Microsoft Mac site.. nor does Micosoft Software update show the availability..
Fooruman
07-20-2009, 12:32 PM
At the moment, the update is on their servers but the download link isn't displaying. I fetched it at manually at this link. (http://download.microsoft.com/download/C/5/3/C534F078-E9E8-4AAE-B845-AF88CD0FFC8E/Office2008-1220UpdateEN.dmg) Works great, actually - Word launches much quicker.
Pascal007
07-20-2009, 12:39 PM
[QUOTE=AppleInsider;1451219]When Office 2004 no longer work at some point, I'll just use iWork, NeoOffice or whatever some non-Microsoft developer offers.
I am not waiting for that to happen : I am progressively migrating from Office 2004 to OpenOffice. Granted, the appearance is less nice, but the files it creates are 50-75 % smaller, the app virtually never crashes, it allows me to do everything I did in Word and Excel (I never used macros) and the final printed result is identical.
Instead of creating YAWP (Yet Another Word Processor), Apple should work with the OO community and bring its ability to create nice interfaces and optimize the port of OO on the Mac. Apple has nothing to lose doing this (iWork is certainly not the reason Apple made so much money this year) and everything to gain : seeing OO gaining market share would weaken Microsoft pull towards its closed (and enclosing) Windows platform. Ensuring the best performance on the Mac would mean a pleasant experience for the Mac users at the same time knowing that they exchange all their files freely with everybody else.
BoyRacer
07-20-2009, 12:42 PM
On January 19 Microsoft released a beta of Entourage for Exchange Web Services; is the final version of that code included in Office 2008 SP2?
Read about it here (http://www.officeformac.com/blog/Entourage-for-Exchange-Web-Services-Beta-is-Live).
Nanotech
07-20-2009, 01:07 PM
Hey it's out, I'm downloading it now. Hopefully it'll go smoothly, but we'll see :)
Edit: Everything seems to work well. I haven't started word up from a restart so I'm not sure how fast word can load...
aaarrrgggh
07-20-2009, 01:08 PM
I'm still sticking with iWork. When I share documents with others, I send PDFs.
Technically that is "distributing" rather than "sharing" which has more to do with collaboration. Semantics, but that is a weakness with iWork...
aaarrrgggh
07-20-2009, 01:12 PM
[QUOTE=Macs_since_1984;1451348]
Instead of creating YAWP (Yet Another Word Processor), Apple should work with the OO community and bring its ability to create nice interfaces and optimize the port of OO on the Mac.
I was always surprised that Apple didn't put their weight behind OOo back in the day. The revenue generated by iWork doesn't seem like it could be enough to justify the project.
I guess it is time for me to try OOo again. It always disappoints me; my main need is spreadsheets, and I could never get quite the performance as with Excel. (Which has finally caught up to where Lotus 123 was in 1997...)
Llama
07-20-2009, 02:13 PM
The most common reasons for not being able to install the update are:
1. You've moved your Office 2008 folder out of Applications. If you've done this, all you need to do is move it back.
2. You've manually removed a file in the Office 2008 folder. If you've done this, you will need to uninstall Office and reinstall it. If there's something in standard installation of Office that you don't want to install, make sure that you do a custom install so that you can select what you want.
3. You've run an application like Monolingual or Xslimmer. If you've done this, you'll also need to uninstall and reinstall it. Do a custom install so that you save the MB that the language files take up, and make sure to exclude the Office folder if you run one of those apps again.Quoted for truth. Their updater is *very* particular on deciding when it can install. The thing I hate most about it is that AFAIK you have to install all of the updates in order to get to the tip, new updates appear to be Delta updates and not Combo style updates. This is only particularly painful when installing for the first time, but even missing one may mean having to go back and download whatever was missing.
DanaCameron
07-20-2009, 02:13 PM
Technically that is "distributing" rather than "sharing" which has more to do with collaboration. Semantics, but that is a weakness with iWork...
Touché. But even when I have had to collaborate on documents recently (correcting text, tracking changes, etc.), iWork has served our needs with no problems. The "weakness" you speak of was not an issue in our case.
kibbled_bits
07-20-2009, 03:13 PM
People still use M$ Office? I use Google Docs for everything and if I can't do it in Google Docs for some reason I use Open Office.
str1f3
07-20-2009, 03:38 PM
People still use M$ Office? I use Google Docs for everything and if I can't do it in Google Docs for some reason I use Open Office.
C'mon. Be real. I wish that Office would bite the dust just because of the stranglehold it has but no one uses Google Docs because it is basic and isn't secure enough for businesses. Less than 1% actually use it and even they support Office formats which doesn't help the issue.
I have to say that the speed improvements in SP2 are very noticeable. It is as fast as iWork.
OC4Theo
07-20-2009, 04:25 PM
Yes, I gave up on these guys a while ago. They don't get it. Just to do an update takes for ever. Even common WORD application is very slow.
I stopped using Office 2004, but then switched back when 2008 came out, only to discover that the same snail pace is still there. I am a full time iWork user, and for my old files, I still use Appleworks.
Microsoft products suck! That is my personal opinion, and I stand by it for life!
No more Microsoft Office for me. :no:
tpf1952
07-20-2009, 04:43 PM
I want to think ill of MS as much as the next guy, but Word is firing up faster than it ever did. I'm resigned to the fact that it won't ever work with Leopard Spaces, at least to spread docs across multiple windows. Regardless, my main writing tool is a fabulous application from the UK called Scrivener. Then comes Pages 09. Alas, I still have to export from either of these applications to Word for Mac before sending stuff to client. If you really need to know what footnotes and the like look like in Word, you have to see them in Word.
bsenka
07-20-2009, 07:30 PM
[QUOTE=Macs_since_1984;1451348]
I am not waiting for that to happen : I am progressively migrating from Office 2004 to OpenOffice. Granted, the appearance is less nice, but the files it creates are 50-75 % smaller, the app virtually never crashes, it allows me to do everything I did in Word and Excel (I never used macros) and the final printed result is identical.
I hate anything MS, so I was really interested in Open Office. Unfortunately, it crashed more than any OS X application I've ever seen. Nine times out of ten, it locked up right on launch.
Cubert
07-20-2009, 08:14 PM
Hey, 18 months to get out a second service pack - not too bad for Micro$ucks.
:no:
DJRumpy
07-20-2009, 08:22 PM
I didn't see it in the notes. Is there still no .ODF format support? They have it in the Windows 2k3 and 2k7 versions and still nothing in the Mac version?
hillstones
07-20-2009, 08:38 PM
Amazing people actually bought Office 2008 when there was really nothing wrong with Office 2004, even on an Intel Mac. Office 2004 in Rosetta opens faster than Pages '09, which is native on Intel. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem that way.
I haven't touch iWork or Office for a long time, but last time i checked, iWork is faster, easier to use and just better i every way except iWork only has less then half features then Office.
Hopefully Next Gen iWork could truly replaces Office.
bobertoq
07-20-2009, 09:37 PM
"SP2 also features increased launch and scroll times in Word 2008"
I hope not. :lol:Took me a while to get that :lol:
iPeon
07-20-2009, 10:10 PM
iWork at my Office. :smokey:
cwingrav
07-20-2009, 10:53 PM
It does seem snappier. If anything, that is worth the download right there. Hope its stable too.
hillstones
07-20-2009, 11:50 PM
I haven't touch iWork or Office for a long time, but last time i checked, iWork is faster, easier to use and just better i every way except iWork only has less then half features then Office.
Hopefully Next Gen iWork could truly replaces Office.
Pages is trash compared to Word. Since you haven't used either in a long time, you don't know what you are talking about. Pages is slower than Word, and yes, it has half the features, so it is worthless in every way possible.
djames42
07-21-2009, 01:10 AM
Amazing people actually bought Office 2008 when there was really nothing wrong with Office 2004, even on an Intel Mac. Office 2004 in Rosetta opens faster than Pages '09, which is native on Intel. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem that way.
I got 2008 because it has better Exchange support (although it's still not very good). I very rarely use any of the other products. When iWork doesn't suffice (which is very rare), I use NeoOffice.
Pages is trash compared to Word. Since you haven't used either in a long time, you don't know what you are talking about. Pages is slower than Word, and yes, it has half the features, so it is worthless in every way possible.
Perhaps not, but I do. I've used both (all three if you count the Windows versions), a lot. You can love Word all you want, but I instantly took to Pages and find it far more capable for page layouts. As for half the features, who cares when 90% of the features in Word aren't used by 90% of people. There are only two things missing from Pages that Word has that I miss: mail-merge to email and document forms (which is handled very poorly on the Mac version anyway). For those I use Word. For everything else I use Pages.
Keynote blows PowerPoint away in nearly every way imaginable. The only thing I can think of that's missing from Keynote is the ability for embedded charts to update themselves. Otherwise, creating presentations takes far longer in PowerPoint due to the need to open up multiple dialogs for transitions, where everything can be handled more easily on Keynote with its inspector.
Numbers creates much more attractive looking charts, but I do admit to it being very slow, particularly in how it handles large spreadsheets (and by large, I mean anything over about 100 rows). Apple *really* needs to tackle performance before it can be a serious competitor. It also lacks database connectivity to have its charts update automatically.
talksense101
07-21-2009, 03:54 AM
I am not waiting for that to happen : I am progressively migrating from Office 2004 to OpenOffice. Granted, the appearance is less nice, but the files it creates are 50-75 % smaller, the app virtually never crashes, it allows me to do everything I did in Word and Excel (I never used macros) and the final printed result is identical.
Instead of creating YAWP (Yet Another Word Processor), Apple should work with the OO community and bring its ability to create nice interfaces and optimize the port of OO on the Mac. Apple has nothing to lose doing this (iWork is certainly not the reason Apple made so much money this year) and everything to gain : seeing OO gaining market share would weaken Microsoft pull towards its closed (and enclosing) Windows platform. Ensuring the best performance on the Mac would mean a pleasant experience for the Mac users at the same time knowing that they exchange all their files freely with everybody else.
Pages & Numbers are a different approach to handling documents and spreadsheets. Keynote is a better solution than PowerPoint for many people. Openoffice works fine on the Mac as it is. Why would Apple be curtailed by the legacy mindset of a tool that mimics Microsoft office except for the document format? It is a community driven effort, let it remain so. One thing Apple can do is to ensure that the document formats are published and provide full support for open office documents.
Innovation is required for all of the applications you find in today's office suites. If people stopped re-inventing text editors, you wouldn't have TextMate or any of the other successful and relatively new text editors.
Talking about YAWP, have you tried IBM Lotus Symphony? It is based on the OO core code base and it is built on top of Eclipse (the popular developer IDE). Lacks some of the nice features of OO, but the UI is much better and polished.
sequitur
07-21-2009, 05:03 AM
[QUOTE=Pascal007;1451372]
I hate anything MS, so I was really interested in Open Office. Unfortunately, it crashed more than any OS X application I've ever seen. Nine times out of ten, it locked up right on launch.
IMHO, NeoOffice works better than Open Office.
Huftonr
07-21-2009, 10:05 AM
Just installed the update. I'm unsure what people's expectations of "snappy load time"s are but just timed Word and it must have taken 20 seconds from clicking the icon to opening up. Word on my old PC at work launches in about 5 seconds? So much for progress.
jdlink
07-21-2009, 11:22 AM
Is there any report of improvements using Entourage with Exchange Server?
cwingrav
07-21-2009, 11:25 AM
1) Installed SP2.
2) Opened three files in Word.
3) Word mixed the text and figures of the third file with the other two. And saved it.
4) <sigh>
5) Check Mozy backup.
6) Realize Mozy's backup for some reason didn't back up the file for the past few months even though daily/weekly backups were made.
7) Thank the Lord that Apple makes Timemachine and restored file.
Well, at least the SP2 makes Word open and scroll faster.
djames42
07-21-2009, 12:08 PM
Is there any report of improvements using Entourage with Exchange Server?
What sort of improvements were you looking for? I've not experienced any reliability issues myself. It would be great if they finally offered more than limited, rudimentary HTML formatting, but alas nothing has changed there...
jdlink
07-21-2009, 12:22 PM
What sort of improvements were you looking for? I've not experienced any reliability issues myself. It would be great if they finally offered more than limited, rudimentary HTML formatting, but alas nothing has changed there...
It's hard to tell whether the problems we've experienced at my company are the fault of Entourage or with our IT department's implementation of Exchange Server, but Entourage users have experienced lost or delayed emails that Outlook users don't experience (they have other problems).
Aizmov
07-21-2009, 12:24 PM
I'm still sticking with iWork. When I share documents with others, I send PDFs.
Two things keeping me from iWork
No RTL support
No ODT support
schmidty
07-21-2009, 08:33 PM
Be careful with this update if you use a site-licensed version of Office.
My installation came from a University site-licence CD, and since applying SP2 I can no longer run any of my office apps.
I just get a pop-up message saying "Office for Mac has determined that your product key is not valid. To use Office for Mac, you must enter a valid product key."
The install disc I used had they key pre-filled, and I don't have it written down anywhere. Now I need to wait for tech services to get back to me, but they'll just have the same key, unless Microsoft has sent a new one.
Pain in the arse!
wraithofwonder
07-22-2009, 02:00 AM
Bah.
Microsoft dang you! I want a messenger that will let me do video chats with other Windows Live users.
* And no guys, there's no chance I'll get the other people to use a different messaging application. :grumble:
djames42
07-22-2009, 09:48 AM
It's hard to tell whether the problems we've experienced at my company are the fault of Entourage or with our IT department's implementation of Exchange Server, but Entourage users have experienced lost or delayed emails that Outlook users don't experience (they have other problems).
FWIW, I've never experienced that myself, not with Entourage 2004 or 2008. My messages don't always come in instantaneously the way they do in Outlook (although the lag is usually no more than a minute or two at most), but that's a symptom of Entourage's Exchange connectivity.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.