View Full Version : The object of my lust...What is yours?
LiquidR
08-24-2003, 04:18 PM
Right now the top thing on my wishlist is a Fuji Finepix S2. After speaking with my instructor about med format vs digital, and with what I plan on doing in the pro photo world, the S2 has become my new object of lust. The good thing is that I can justify the purchase as a business expense once I'm done with school.
What are the objects of your lust besides a new G5?8)
Anders
08-24-2003, 04:19 PM
A woman I canīt have :(
Yes call me shallow but thats the truth.
LiquidR
08-24-2003, 04:21 PM
Now is this really unrequited lust??? or is it love?
InactionMan
08-24-2003, 11:48 PM
I really don't care for cars but I think this one would be alright for tooling around town.
http://www.vwvortex.com/news/09_01/bugatti/01.jpg
Realistically, I just want an iPod.
audiopollution
08-25-2003, 12:24 AM
Originally posted by InactionMan
I really don't care for cars but I think this one would be alright for tooling around town.
Scary thing is that it's electronically limited to 400km/h (250mph), and if unrestricted (and without any gearing changes) it's actually capable of 450km/h.
Got a spare million?
VanDeWaals
08-25-2003, 12:27 AM
I was all set to say Catherine Zeta-Jones when I saw this topic 8)
As far as objects of GADGET lust...
an iPod
a digital camera
a G5 PowerBook
.....Oh and a charcoal grey, fully loaded BMW M5
(sigh) I can dream can't I?
Kirkland
08-25-2003, 01:13 AM
Elijah Wood.
Oh, and a G5 PowerBook, should one ever exist.
And Elijah Wood.
Wotan
08-25-2003, 01:44 AM
A Leica M6
http://www.leica-camera.com/imperia/md/images/leica/demoanimat/106.gif
I've been wanting one of these for so long...
Aquafire
08-25-2003, 01:50 AM
No offence Wotan, but the M6 is a dud.
Totally stuffed without batteries..
All electronic shutter...
Oskar would be turning in his grave.
Your far better of with the orginal M4 upon which it is modelled. Totally mechanical...clean..silky smooth..& with a timer.
Lee Friendlander, Cartier Bresson, David Douglas Duncan, Ralph Gibson, & many many others swear this is the one and only for them...
So if it's cult status within a cult..this is the baby...
More drools per the millimetre than any other leica ever built.
Wotan
08-25-2003, 02:02 AM
Originally posted by Aquafire
No offence Wotan, but the M6 is a dud.
Totally stuffed without batteries..
All electronic shutter...
Oskar would be turning in his grave.
Your far better of with the orginal M4 upon which it is modelled. Totally mechanical...clean..silky smooth..& with a timer.
Lee Friendlander, Cartier Bresson, David Douglas Duncan, Ralph Gibson, & many many others swear this is the one and only for them...
So if it's cult status within a cult..this is the baby...
More drools per the millimetre than any other leica ever built.
Hmm. Did not know that about the M6. I guess I'll have to go with the M4 instead.
http://www.goolsbee.org/forzamille/images/Tuesday/1967-Ferrari-275-GTB-4.jpg
Actually that is one of the images that came up on a Google Image Search for "Object Of Lust." Here's another:
http://www.benlovejoy.com/nostalgia/macportable_open.jpg
Wagnerite
08-25-2003, 04:23 AM
Originally posted by Luca Rescigno
http://www.goolsbee.org/forzamille/images/Tuesday/1967-Ferrari-275-GTB-4.jpg
that would be a 1967 Ferrari 275GTB/4
let me post a pic of mine, the one i got is red tho (also '67)....
http://mysite.verizon.net/wagnerite/carpicfolder2/foobar/fcarpics/dooropen.jpg
but what i lust after, is also a woman that i can't have :(
gsxrboy
08-25-2003, 05:22 AM
At the moment it would be her.. cant say anymore..
Apart from that, MV Augusta F5 Senna (not yet released), with full Ohlins running gear, Akrapovic full Ti system and an xtra 25hp at rear wheel... Canon D1 digital with 80-200 f2.8l lens and a few other goodies... plus a world of other things both material and mental..
All items sadly to never to be part of my world it seems :( some a world away in fact.
Wagnerite
08-25-2003, 05:24 AM
Originally posted by Anders
A woman I canīt have :(
Yes call me shallow but thats the truth.
Originally posted by Wagnerite
also a woman that i can't have :(
Originally posted by gsxrboy
At the moment it would be her.. cant say anymore..
man, i would hate to discover that we've all been after the same chick :D
gsxrboy
08-25-2003, 05:48 AM
Originally posted by Wagnerite
man, i would hate to discover that we've all been after the same chick :D
hahhaha, prolly not she doesnt live that close to you :)
(hmm on second thoughts this bit edited out)
ahh screw it all lets fire up the motorbikes and top them out while listening to new (cant really afford but did) ipods WooT!!!! hmmm tunes while riding :D
Wagnerite
08-25-2003, 05:51 AM
Originally posted by gsxrboy
ahh screw it all lets fire up the motorbikes and top them out while listening to new ipods WooT!!!! hmmm tunes while riding :D
you go ahead, i'll be on my bicycle and in my spandex hanging on to your motocycle. dont forget about the dual 1/8 adaptor for that ipod so i can listen too ;)
Aquafire
08-25-2003, 07:02 AM
Originally posted by Wotan
Hmm. Did not know that about the M6. I guess I'll have to go with the M4 instead.
Trust me, If you buy an M4 and look after it, not only will you have lots of fun, but you will get back every penny you paid for it as well as a very handsome profit..
But as an ex-M4 owner I do warn you..when it comes to selling it.....( if you ever manage to that is ), you will toss & turn for months...
Fink that I am, I was offered some really " serious " money due to my M4's serial Number. .....No 1234563..
I couldn't resist the really fat wad of dough the guy put under my nose.
Yeah don't rub it in..I'm a nogoodnik...
And to make matters worse I miss my baby...sigh:rolleyes:
shetline
08-25-2003, 09:02 AM
World peace. :D
Eugene
08-25-2003, 09:40 AM
You have a Ferrari and still can't get a particular lady?
Powerdoc
08-25-2003, 09:58 AM
Originally posted by Eugene
You have a Ferrari and still can't get a particular lady?
Ladies obey less than cars ... :D
Moogs
08-25-2003, 10:24 AM
Nikon D2X
Nikkor 200-400 AFS
Nikon LS-4000
Dual G5
audiopollution
08-25-2003, 10:29 AM
Originally posted by Powerdoc
Ladies obey less than cars ... :D
... but Italian cars require inordinately more attention.
Wagnerite
08-25-2003, 02:10 PM
Originally posted by audiopollution
... but Italian cars require inordinately more attention.
hear,hear!
bunge
08-25-2003, 04:14 PM
MLS Cup back in Chicago.
Powerdoc
08-25-2003, 04:28 PM
Originally posted by audiopollution
... but Italian cars require inordinately more attention.
More than italians women ? :D
http://osx.wieck.com/pv/WKA/2003/06/03/WKA2003060341853_pv.jpg
http://osx.wieck.com/pv/WKA/2003/06/30/WKA2003063057065_pv.jpg
http://osx.wieck.com/pv/WKA/2003/06/03/WKA2003060341894_pv.jpg
Placebo
08-25-2003, 04:58 PM
I'd have to go with a totally tweaked and tricked Audi A4.
Or maybe a pair of Oakleys.
Wotan: Get a Nikon FM-3. Awesome, awesome camera. Or an FM-2. (That's my fave)
LiquidR
08-26-2003, 12:08 AM
Okay, now I'm really envious, a girl in my class has just got a Canon Eos 10D, she already has a Hasselblad 503 and plans on picking up the H1. OMG, I wish I could plop down 2 grand at a time for a new camera. 4 grand for the H1.
LoCash
08-26-2003, 12:41 AM
Originally posted by Placebo
Wotan: Get a Nikon FM-3. Awesome, awesome camera. Or an FM-2. (That's my fave)
You've never shot with a Leica, have you? My Nikon F100 (Thanks Moogs) is my workhorse, but it can't compare to an M4. The M4 is quite possibly the most beautiful camera I have ever made an exposure with.
Eugene
08-26-2003, 12:44 AM
I want to burn all these things.
LiquidR
08-26-2003, 12:49 AM
orignally posted by Eugene
I want to burn all these things.
Eugene if you burn any Leicas I'm sure God will make a special place in Hell for you. :lol:
Mmmm, F100. I recently shot a motorcycle rodeo with a guy from Easyriders, dude had 3 F5s.
LoCash
08-26-2003, 12:56 AM
The F5 is too big for me, to be quite honest. The added featureset doesn't motivate me enough to want it. The F100 is my primary, and I have an n90s as a back-up for the shoots I do.
LiquidR
08-26-2003, 12:59 AM
Do you shoot professionally or as a serious hobbyist?
Aquafire
08-26-2003, 01:59 AM
Originally posted by Placebo
" Wotan: Get a Nikon FM-3. Awesome, awesome camera. Or an FM-2. (That's my fave)
Placebo, at the end of the day, the above cameras are just that..cameras..they do a job, they do it well..
Whereas a Leica M4 is more than a camera..it is a legend with a cult following that leaves everything else looking like wannabe's. :smokey:
LiquidR
08-26-2003, 03:38 AM
I love film and will always shoot it for my own purposes, but the professional level that I want to enter I think will be easier to handle if I go digital. I think I'm going to try to save to get one in the spring, maybe the S3 will be out by then, price drop on the S2 maybe.
I would love to go with a Leica, way elegant camera, I've never actually used one myself, but the reports I get from others is comparable to what Mac users say of their computers, just a great experience. But I don't think it will take me in the digital direction without me spending way more money than I'm going to have in the near future.
Aquafire
08-26-2003, 04:42 AM
Originally posted by LiquidR
I love film and will always shoot it for my own purposes, but the professional level that I want to enter I think will be easier to handle if I go digital. ......
......I would love to go with a Leica, way elegant camera, I've never actually used one myself, but the reports I get from others is comparable to what Mac users say of their computers, just a great experience.
Well put LiquidR.
In my time, I've probably owned about 300 cameras or more..No bullshit..I used to buy cameras for X and sell them for X + 50% or more whenever I got a chance. It helped me to support myself while studying for my degree in photography.
My lecturer used to drool over the cameras i'd bring in..but I never had any real " brand " loyalty..until the day I picked up my first Leica. it was a Leica IIIc as used by Cartier Bresson in his earlier days...
Well needless to say it was love at first sight...
But your right about making hard headed business choices..
I decided to examine my real business needs (camera wise) as opposed to my fantasy..
As a consequence, I sold all my 5"x4" Linhof gear. All my Canon gear,as well as almost all my Nikon gear including a coolpix 5000.
I now run an art studio business using the following.
1 Hasselblad 500 CM
1 Nikon Fe-2 with 35mm
2 Nikon L35 AF pocket cameras
1 Nikon Coolpix digital 700 ( 2.1 Mpixels )
This frugal collection covers about 95% of my shoots..
That was six months ago, & I have absolutely no regrets..Sure I miss playing with the gear, but all that money in the bank makes me happier than any huge camera collection collecting dust....
:)
LiquidR
08-26-2003, 05:04 AM
Originally posted by Aquafire
Well put LiquidR.
In my time, I've probably owned about 300 cameras or more..No bullshit..I used to buy cameras for X and sell them for X + 50% or more whenever I got a chance. It helped me to support myself while studying for my degree in photography.
sic
I now run an art studio business using the following.
1 Hasselblad 500 CM
1 Nikon Fe-2 with 35mm
2 Nikon L35 AF pocket cameras
1 Nikon Coolpix digital 700 ( 2.1 Mpixels )
This frugal collection covers about 95% of my shoots..
sic
Sounds like a guy worked for in Charlotte, he had a tractor trailor filled with camera and lighting equipment that he picked up from photographers that were going out of the business. Too bad he really sold out his photo ambition for the lure of his family's money.
Art studio? Is it your sole source of income? Got a website with some of your images? I'd love to take a gander.
I'm back in school for a photo degree now. It's what I should've done in the first place, not the stupid Journalism degree that I don't use.
KingOfSomewhereHot
08-26-2003, 05:49 AM
A Grumman Albatross !
room for the family, room for my boards, can get me to ANY primo surf in the world !
http://homepage.mac.com/brittingham/profile.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/brittingham/h20land.jpg
Aquafire
08-26-2003, 05:56 AM
" Art studio?
Well I am actually a painter as in " fine art " these days.
I take photographs for reference and also do a sideline of making high quality slides etc for other artists who need to put professional looking art portfolios etc together..
" Is it your sole source of income? Got a website with some of your images? I'd love to take a gander."
Actually, I make more money as a painter now than I ever did as a photographer. My paintings start at $1500 each up to $5000..
I'm mostly flat out painting and don't have the time to set up a web site yet..but eventually I will..& as soon as I do I will let you know.
It's just the way the market is..( or was ) in my day...
I reckon I easily spent $100,000 over 10 years in promoting my Fine Art photography..I earned maybe only 50c in return per each dollar spent..
But I was young & kept believing I'd get noticed & famous. Trouble with such dreams is you can't afford to be too far ahead of the pack. I kept thinking I'd change the world...get people to appreciate ( and buy ) photographs.
But when you ask people to close their eyes and to tell you what they see in their head when you say the word " Art " 99% of them would say " a painting "
So in the ten years I've been painting ( basedon my Photographs ) I've been making money hand over fist..
But I have absolutely no regrets, as photography helped to sharpen my compositional skills as well as my eye for colour and lighting...
"I'm back in school for a photo degree now. It's what I should've done in the first place, not the stupid Journalism degree that I don't use.
Don't trash the Journo degree quite yet. I can think of dozens of great photo-journalists who fly all over the world taking shots and writing stories...I knew one guy who used to work for National Geographic..he couldn't believe his luck when they offered him the job..
Fancy being paid to travel and take pictures and have adventures & write about them ?
What a hoot !!!
:D
Placebo
08-26-2003, 09:51 AM
Originally posted by LoCash
You've never shot with a Leica, have you? My Nikon F100 (Thanks Moogs) is my workhorse, but it can't compare to an M4. The M4 is quite possibly the most beautiful camera I have ever made an exposure with.
I don't need a camera that has a cult following. I need one with good optics and a good feel. I'm sure that the M4 delivers wonderfully in both those areas, but sometimes one just doesn't need what a "luxury" camera has to offer.
The F-100 and F-5, in my opinion, are too much of a departure from the idea of a camera. To many buttons, options, automated processes- I'm most at home with a full-manual camera that does nothing that I don't tell it to do.
I didn't ask to be flamed, I'm just saying that the FM-2 is one of the best cameras I've used, not to mention that you can get one for $350-- a fourth of what you'd spend on an M4.
But if you want to see the piece of optical genius that I lust after, look:
http://www.ittnv.com/images/itt/AN-AVS6large.jpg
ITT Gen-4 AN/PVS-7 Nightvision Goggles. I'd do anything for these things (anything except dish out $5000, of course)
Kickaha
08-26-2003, 11:29 AM
So... Apple, Leica, Ducati... noticing a trend here... well-made, well-designed pieces of equipment that act more like an extension of you rather than something you 'operate', and create a cult following for those who 'get it'.
Any other nominations? :D
Kickaha
08-26-2003, 02:52 PM
She's got a cult following of happy users?
Dude, I hate to tell you this, but...
Originally posted by Kickaha
She's got a cult following of happy users?
Dude, I hate to tell you this, but...
Heh. You didn't say anything about 'users', just a cult following...
And I'm the only one 'getting it', from her anyways. :p
LoCash
08-26-2003, 04:17 PM
I wasn't trying to flame you man, just saying that if you have shot with a Leica, it's kind of the 35 body that others are judged upon. Call the M4 a luxury camera if you will, I call it one of the most beautiful, workhorses of a rangefinder I've ever shot with, and if I had the spare cash, I'd buy one in a heartbeat.
I'm sure the FM-2 is a nice little camera. When I'm shooting my own personal artwork, I use my manual bodies. When I'm shooting commercially, I use my F100. It's just weird how you react to the Leica, because most photographers I know get wet dreams about owning a Leica...
Aquafire
08-26-2003, 07:13 PM
Originally posted by LoCash
I wasn't trying to flame you man, just saying that if you have shot with a Leica, it's kind of the 35 body that others are judged upon. Call the M4 a luxury camera if you will, I call it one of the most beautiful, workhorses of a rangefinder I've ever shot with, and if I had the spare cash, I'd buy one in a heartbeat.
I'm sure the FM-2 is a nice little camera. When I'm shooting my own personal artwork, I use my manual bodies. When I'm shooting commercially, I use my F100. It's just weird how you react to the Leica, because most photographers I know get wet dreams about owning a Leica...
Like I said, sure the Leica M4 costs a bucket, but the point is if you look after it, you can sell it down the road a piece for much more than you paid for it.
You will never lose money owning a lLeica M4..that's one of it's virtues for being a cult status object..it never depreciates.
But try selling it...Oh man..what torture....
LiquidR
08-26-2003, 11:11 PM
Well, my lust for a digital camera has just increased. My class was just clear for the D1X today, and worked a little more with the Sinar digital back. SO Much FUn!!! The D1X isn't as intuitive as I would like a camera to be, but I'm still having a great time just shooting the hell outta it. The only reason I'm not shooting now is cuz the battery needs charging. Nothing special just trying to get the feel of it today.8) :) :D
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.