PDA

View Full Version : Too short for the big house...


Chris Cuilla
05-26-2006, 04:51 PM
This is an interesting judicial decision:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/05/26/judge.flap.ap/index.html

Seems Richard W. Thompson at 5'1" tall, has escaped what would be a normal prison sentence (10 years in jail) for his conviction (molesting a 12-year old girl) due to his height.

Seems rather odd.

Seems that other remedies (the stated purpose was for his protection) might have been possible (don't they generally have special "wards" for higher risk inmates?

What is especially interesting (given the stated reasoning) is that it is rumored that child sex offenders are often at risk in the general prison population anyway (something about "honor among criminals" and child molesters being the "bottom of the bucket" or what-not)...if this is true, and the goal (apparently) is to protect the prisoner from harm, why not probabtion anyone that might be at such risk, regardless of height?

Another question is whether this sets up a precedent for "reverse discrimination" (based on height)...that is taller people get prison while shorter people get probation and/or house arrest.

Thoughts on this?

BRussell
05-26-2006, 05:00 PM
He's lucky he wasn't 6'8", or he would have gotten the death penalty.

trumptman
05-29-2006, 02:41 PM
Makes about as much sense as any other decision by our courts in this day and age.

Nick

Placebo
05-29-2006, 05:59 PM
Originally posted by trumptman
Makes about as much sense as any other decision by our courts in this day and age.

Nick
Like what?

trumptman
05-29-2006, 08:15 PM
Originally posted by Placebo
Like what?

How about Kelo et al v. City of New London for a start.

We could go on like with cases where the ten commandment can be presented at a courthouse on a huge granite slab because in that instance they were "historical" and could not in another instance be displayed on an 8x11 piece of paper because in that instance they were an endorsement.

That is a pretty decent start.

Nick

Northgate
05-31-2006, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by trumptman
Makes about as much sense as any other decision by our courts in this day and age.

Nick

Unless they make decisions you agree with. Which is probably 50% of the time.