Swine flu and big pharma

Posted:
in AppleOutsider edited January 2014
So Baxter is the company that applied for a 2008 patent (granted in 2009 a month before the swine flu outbreak in Mexico) for treating swine flu.



http://www.bing.com/search?q=baxter+...lu&form=OSDSRC



It is also the company that shipped contaminated vaccines for the Avian flu worldwide by mistake.



http://www.bing.com/search?q=baxter+...&filt=all&qs=n



(Substitute bing with Google if you want to.)



These along with the rest of the theories out there (with some degree of facts) lead to the conclusion that this "outbreak" was manufactured in a lab. So what do you think?

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 1
    sammi josammi jo Posts: 4,634member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by talksense101 View Post


    So Baxter is the company that applied for a 2008 patent (granted in 2009 a month before the swine flu outbreak in Mexico) for treating swine flu.



    http://www.bing.com/search?q=baxter+...lu&form=OSDSRC



    It is also the company that shipped contaminated vaccines for the Avian flu worldwide by mistake.



    http://www.bing.com/search?q=baxter+...&filt=all&qs=n



    (Substitute bing with Google if you want to.)



    These along with the rest of the theories out there (with some degree of facts) lead to the conclusion that this "outbreak" was manufactured in a lab. So what do you think?



    The constant clamor by governments and media about the inevitable "deadly" swine flu pandemic have brought about a fearful, infantilized, and thus easily coerced population, quite willing to be vaccinated. Compulsory vaccination might even become the rule in some places.



    This is yet another instance of big government corporate welfare, ultimately paid for by the people/taxpayers. One of the scientists who blew the whistle on Baxter got the standard treatment for siding with public, rather than corporate, interest.
Sign In or Register to comment.