Apple ads hint at thinner iMacs, lighter MacBooks, cheaper Mac minis

12345679»

Comments

  • Reply 161 of 177
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by s.metcalf View Post


    The Apple logo is offensively bright in that design. I don't mind seeing one but it has to be subtle, your one is far too distracting.



    That was my first impression. It was like, "hey look at me! I have a shiny Apple logo where my balls should be!"
  • Reply 162 of 177
    mjteixmjteix Posts: 563member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FuturePastNow View Post


    With hyperthreading, it's actually capable of running four threads at that speed. And there are a number of minor architectural improvements which make an i7 processor faster than Core 2 clock-for-clock, plus that on-die memory controller. But I digress.



    Of course you do. And you still wrong, the Ci7-820QM top speed is 3.06GHz on ONE core (that means 2 threads not four). And it's already more expensive than the 3.06GHz C2D.



    Yes, Core i7 cpus are better processors than core 2 duo, I am not saying that Apple should stay with C2D in the iMac. I am just saying that most Clarksfields would not be an improvement: they are not THAT fast and they are MORE expensive.



    Intel has already a better solution in the Xeon L3426 that is very close in performance to the top of the line Clarksfield and costs a lot less. This cpu and a couple other faster ones custom-made by Intel for Apple would be way more suited for the iMac in terms of performance and will keep the prices low for the user.



    With it's TDP of 45W and 3420 chipset at 4.5W, it's not even incompatible with thinner iMacs (as per the rumors), also the power hungry and expensive 9400M chipset would not be used and it would make room (space and cost and TDP) for better dedicated gpus.
  • Reply 163 of 177
    benroethigbenroethig Posts: 2,782member
    The one issue is that the L3426 is a unique part.
  • Reply 164 of 177
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BenRoethig View Post


    The one issue is that the L3426 is a unique part.



    Good point. Where's the L3425 and L3427?
  • Reply 165 of 177
    It looks the Imac update is not for today?



    Regards
  • Reply 166 of 177
    solipsismsolipsism Posts: 25,726member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jraffin View Post


    It looks the Imac update is not for today?



    Regards



    If it is more than a speed bump, then it would warrant a special event. There has been a Fall event for Macs for several years running, with last year?s falling on Tuesday, October 13th. I?m predicting that we?ll get word by Thursday of an event next week.
  • Reply 167 of 177
    backtomacbacktomac Posts: 4,579member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Outsider View Post


    Good point. Where's the L3425 and L3427?



    Don't exist AFAIK. Here's the Xenon lineup, straight from Intel:







    This shows the L3426 running at 1.86 ghz at base line. No QPI which I find curious. I really don't know much about the chip but I doubt its substantially different from the clarksfield cpus. They can't just create a faster, cooler chip out of thin air.
  • Reply 168 of 177
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by backtomac View Post


    Don't exist AFAIK. Here's the Xenon lineup, straight from Intel:







    This shows the L3426 running at 1.86 ghz at base line. No QPI which I find curious. I really don't know much about the chip but I doubt its substantially different from the clarksfield cpus. They can't just create a faster, cooler chip out of thin air.



    I know, I was being facetious. It is interesting they chose such a specific number. Sort of alludes to a whole family of L34xx series Xeon (minus the N :P ). Also, it doesn't have QPI, obviously because it's based on the Lynnfield core. No QPI because it already has an on board PCI-E controller and memory controller. All it needs is a pretty fast DMI for basic IO (USB, SATA, sound, ethernet, etc.).
  • Reply 169 of 177
    They may want to synchronize the whole thing with the opening of the two first french AppleStores (which will eventually allow them to distribute directly the new hardware).

    Just a guess, but would be a real boost for them to do so if the new stuff is cool.



    Anyway, as we don't know when they will open, the mystery is still there. I recall reading somewhere it would be around the 25th of October, but I am not sure about this one...
  • Reply 170 of 177
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mjteix View Post


    Of course you do. And you still wrong, the Ci7-820QM top speed is 3.06GHz on ONE core (that means 2 threads not four). And it's already more expensive than the 3.06GHz C2D.



    Yes, Core i7 cpus are better processors than core 2 duo, I am not saying that Apple should stay with C2D in the iMac. I am just saying that most Clarksfields would not be an improvement: they are not THAT fast and they are MORE expensive.



    Intel has already a better solution in the Xeon L3426 that is very close in performance to the top of the line Clarksfield and costs a lot less. This cpu and a couple other faster ones custom-made by Intel for Apple would be way more suited for the iMac in terms of performance and will keep the prices low for the user.



    With it's TDP of 45W and 3420 chipset at 4.5W, it's not even incompatible with thinner iMacs (as per the rumors), also the power hungry and expensive 9400M chipset would not be used and it would make room (space and cost and TDP) for better dedicated gpus.



    So you dismiss the i7-QM processors and then plug Lynnfield-derived Xeons, which are essentially the same thing. The same piece of silicon, on a different package, using the same chipset. That's great.
  • Reply 171 of 177
    mjteixmjteix Posts: 563member
    WOW. Such negative thinking!



    - You guys have already forgotten that the iMac has been using custom cpus (E8x35) for about 2 years and that E8x35 series cpus are nowhere to be found in Intel's own lists of processors. That doesn't mean a thing.



    _ IF there were other Xeons of the L34xx series, they would probably be L3436, L3446, etc. since the third digit is for the speed/clock, the fourth being for particular features.



    - The L3426 is "just" a low-voltage Lynnfield with a memory controller that supports ECC RAM (hence the Xeon denomination). It doesn't have all the temperature related features of full mobile chips (aimed for notebooks) but those aren't required for small server (or desktop) systems.



    - Not all Xeons are based on the multiple processors capable Xeons, some, like all the ones from the x34xx series, are based on the desktop Core i5/i7 cpus, Intel updates/activates ECC RAM support, and that's all.



    - The L3426 uses a 3400/3420 chipset that is very similar to the desktop P55 chipset. Cheap and only 4.5W. FWIW, the 3420 chipset will also support Jasper Forest 32nm cpus that will be launched in Q1 2010.



    - There are about as many SKUs in the xeon family than desktop and mobile SKUs combined. Where do you think you can find to most diverse types of cpus?



    - Intel has always offered custom chips for some clients, Apple is no stranger to that and there is absolutly no reason why they couldn't get custom-made cpus based on the L3426 if they wanted to.



    - Yes, the L3426 is not much different from a Clarksfield, it is just faster and way less expensive. The iMac doesn't need a mobile cpu, when alternatives are available at the same TDP, and they certainly don't need more expensive cpus for the sake of it.



    - What's so difficult to understand:

    Xeon L3426 1.86/3.20GHz 45W $284, chipset 4.5W $25 (3400) or $31 (3420)

    Ci7-720QM 1.60/2.80GHz 45W $364, chipset 3.5W $40 (PM55)

    Ci7-820QM 1.73/3.06GHz 45W $546, chipset 3.5W $40 (PM55)

    Ci7-920XM 2.00/3.20GHz 55W $1,054, chipset 3.5W $40 (PM55)



    - Stop calling Xeon cpus Xenon.
  • Reply 172 of 177
    backtomacbacktomac Posts: 4,579member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mjteix View Post


    - Stop calling Xeon cpus Xenon.



    Oops. My bad, I'll fess up to my error.



    PS I hope you're right. I'm just not holding my breath.
  • Reply 173 of 177
    mjteixmjteix Posts: 563member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FuturePastNow View Post


    So you dismiss the i7-QM processors and then plug Lynnfield-derived Xeons, which are essentially the same thing. The same piece of silicon, on a different package, using the same chipset. That's great.



    Of course I do. One thing that I don't want is for the iMac to cost more than it does already. The L3426 has better performances than both QM chips, pretty close to the XM chip, AND is way less expensive. That's being GREAT.



    FWIW, it doesn't use the same chipset. It uses a cheaper 3400/3420 chipset. Ain't that GREAT?



    If you think that it's GREAT to pay more (up to 4x more) for the "same piece of silicon", you can have them all.



    Intel has offered quad-core mobile chips for about 2 years, none to be seen on any Mac computer. Overpriced, just like Clarksfield. What makes you think that Apple will use Clarksfield, this time?





    Quote:
    Originally Posted by backtomac


    Oops. My bad, I'll fess up to my error.



    PS I hope you're right. I'm just not holding my breath.




    Nor do I. This is not a prediction. I've learned to always expect something different (good or bad) from Apple over the years. I just can't stand people wanting Clarksfield in the iMac (and dismissing everything else) while there are better alternatives in line with the current design/price points.
  • Reply 174 of 177
    Shipping times on the iMac and Mini have slipped again on the Apple Store - Mini is now 3-5 days out. Low end 24" iMac is 1-2 days.
  • Reply 175 of 177
    My imac is being replaced through Apple (corporate level). The replacement was supposed to be shipped around 10/01/09. I got a call this week to let me know that the imac probably won't ship until 10/15/09. They are experiencing big back-order problems. I assume this will be after the announcement of the new imac and everything settles back down.
  • Reply 176 of 177
    solipsismsolipsism Posts: 25,726member
    Neflix CEO Reed Hastings states that “streaming will be bigger than DVDs at Netflix in under two years.”
  • Reply 177 of 177
    aizmovaizmov Posts: 989member
    So when will the new Macbook be revealed?
Sign In or Register to comment.