Apple (h.264 codec) vs Adobe (Flash)

stzozostzozo
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
I really think that Adobe should drop Flash and fast... If they don't Apple will start making graphic design software that will probably ROCK the industry at half the price of Adobe Creative Suites. So please Adobe be practical and don't suicide your Company. Just drop Flash and MOVE ON ! H.264 codec is NOW and will be the FUTURE.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 2
    kenjisankenjisan Posts: 3member
    Aren't we all trying to drop flash and going towards html 5?
  • Reply 2 of 2
    dayrobotdayrobot Posts: 133member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by stzozo View Post


    I really think that Adobe should drop Flash and fast... If they don't Apple will start making graphic design software that will probably ROCK the industry at half the price of Adobe Creative Suites. So please Adobe be practical and don't suicide your Company. Just drop Flash and MOVE ON ! H.264 codec is NOW and will be the FUTURE.



    H.264 is what powers flash FLV files, as used by YouTube and others...



    Adobe is using H.264 themselves. Flash is still a necessary compatibility layer for browsers that don't support the <video> tag yet...







    Dan
Sign In or Register to comment.