Blu-Ray playback? What are you smoking. It's a notebook.
Have to say that I feel exactly the same about onboard HDM as wellI. HDMI is a one-trick-pony fro connecting to televisions. Most/all computer monitors seem to be using VGA/DVI and there is nothing but VGA in the university classroom.
The fact that you can have a single display port that can handle all these by selecting a different dongle is much smarter. The fact that Apple can get us to pay $30 bucks of the darn things is pure genius!!!!
Was one of those i7 reviews supposed to be for the dual core 2.7ghz i7, or did that one not get reviewed?
Have been using my new 2011 Macbook Pro 15-inch for about a week now. Impressions:
Good:
- Impressive speed - delivers as promised.
- Have the high-res matte screen. Sharp, bright, love the extra screen real-estate.
- Enjoying the trackpad - the multitouch gestures are more than a gimmick, extremely useful in a good number of situations.
Bad:
- Battery life in real world usage is very, very disappointing. Granted, if you browse using Safari on non-Flash websites at 50% brightness or so, you can get 7 hours ... however, the drop-off from 7 hours if you do almost anything else is precipitous. Real use battery life - doing something like moderate (not high intensity) ... layout in Pages, media browsing, Photoshop, Garage Band or X-Code - is only 2-3 hours. What seems to be different from previous Macbook Pros I have owned is how precipitous this drop-off is between the 'light usage' and real usage. If you are willing to spend your time managing battery life and limiting which software you use, the battery seems capable of impressive times ... BUT if you just get on with doing your thing, this new MacBook Pro's battery time suffers unlike any before.
- Battery life in real world usage is very, very disappointing. Granted, if you browse using Safari on non-Flash websites at 50% brightness or so, you can get 7 hours ... however, the drop-off from 7 hours if you do almost anything else is precipitous. Real use battery life - doing something like moderate (not high intensity) ... layout in Pages, media browsing, Photoshop, Garage Band or X-Code - is only 2-3 hours. What seems to be different from previous Macbook Pros I have owned is how precipitous this drop-off is between the 'light usage' and real usage. If you are willing to spend your time managing battery life and limiting which software you use, the battery seems capable of impressive times ... BUT if you just get on with doing your thing, this new MacBook Pro's battery time suffers unlike any before.
The battery life compared to other machines is good, but there is an unfortunate flaws with the way the GPU switches between the integrated and discrete GPUs.
One, from what I recall reading it?s not based on actual graphic usage but on certain process types that trigger the usage. This includes Flash, so even if it?s just a Flash ad or if Flash is idle even though the Safari app is closed it will still be using the dGPU. I wish it was smarter.
Two, Apple only has two options for the dGPU. Either dynamic switching or the dGPU always on. I?d like two things to change here. One being the option to only use the iGP, and the other to auto allow the iGP to run when using battery as the power source and dGPU when plugged in.
Here is a free workaround to increase your battery life.
The battery life compared to other machines is good, but there is an unfortunate flaws with the way the GPU switches between the integrated and discrete GPUs.
...
Here is a free workaround to increase your battery life.
Yes - 3rd party fixes for the lack of GPU control may be the way to go. I'm a little reluctant to use a 3rd party fix for something so low-level in the OS in case it affects the more general performance that I'm very happy with - but I hope that's unfounded.
This sort of thing is the big downside to buying Apple. When it works it *just works* - when it doesn't (and, happily, it's not that often), they mostly refuse to do anything for far too long (as well as trying to deny the issue up to the moment it is fixed). Even when there seems like something obvious they could do to improve things - like an 'always off' option here.
I've owned 5 Mac portables over about 15 years and to be frank, the battery is the one element that has always failed to live up to expectations (even with the understanding that all battery claims are, in general, huge exaggerations). I was very skeptical when Apple went with the non-user-replaceable design but optimistic if it the new batteries were really a significant improvement over previous ones. However, that really doesn't seem to be the case. Granted, they're a bit better, but not to the extent that you don't need a second battery when doing real world tasks on, say, a long flight. Hopefully the claims of longevity are not as caveated.
I've owned 5 Mac portables over about 15 years and to be frank, the battery is the one element that has always failed to live up to expectations (even with the understanding that all battery claims are, in general, huge exaggerations).
They aren?t exaggerations, they are using a specific set of tests. You?ll get what they promise you.
If you want to run Photoshop Garageband and Xcode at the same time that duration will drop significantly. That?s not an exageration on Apple?s part, that?s just the reality of it.
Apple has been making their tests more stringent over the years and announced another change to their battery measurements last year when the introduced the new MBAs which is why the 2011 MBPs have a lower battery duration despite running as long or better than the previous models.
They aren?t exaggerations, they are using a specific set of tests. You?ll get what they promise you.
If you want to run Photoshop Garageband and Xcode at the same time that duration will drop significantly. That?s not an exageration on Apple?s part, that?s just the reality of it.
Apple has been making their tests more stringent over the years and announced another change to their battery measurements last year when the introduced the new MBAs which is why the 2011 MBPs have a lower battery duration despite running as long or better than the previous models.
There's no need to defend Apple to me - obviously I like 'em - I've been using their computers exclusively for over 20 years. Like most other Mac users, I know there's an asterisk that sits beside the claim of 7 hours.
However, as a long time user of Macs, I'm seeing that compared to the way previous Apple batteries performed in real work conditions vs. Apple's use case scenario, these batteries/computers are a bit different. The drop off between light use and real use is much greater. Anyone with previous experience of Apple batteries who is thinking of getting a new one based on the 7 hour claim should be warned: those 7 hours do not scale so well to real work use.
Anyway, just trying to inform. If you don't like the word 'exaggeration', pick another one that you prefer.
[Fyi I wasn't talking about using all those pieces of software at the same time ... just one will do it.]
Comments
Blu-Ray playback? What are you smoking. It's a notebook.
Have to say that I feel exactly the same about onboard HDM as wellI. HDMI is a one-trick-pony fro connecting to televisions. Most/all computer monitors seem to be using VGA/DVI and there is nothing but VGA in the university classroom.
The fact that you can have a single display port that can handle all these by selecting a different dongle is much smarter. The fact that Apple can get us to pay $30 bucks of the darn things is pure genius!!!!
Was one of those i7 reviews supposed to be for the dual core 2.7ghz i7, or did that one not get reviewed?
Good:
- Impressive speed - delivers as promised.
- Have the high-res matte screen. Sharp, bright, love the extra screen real-estate.
- Enjoying the trackpad - the multitouch gestures are more than a gimmick, extremely useful in a good number of situations.
Bad:
- Battery life in real world usage is very, very disappointing. Granted, if you browse using Safari on non-Flash websites at 50% brightness or so, you can get 7 hours ... however, the drop-off from 7 hours if you do almost anything else is precipitous. Real use battery life - doing something like moderate (not high intensity) ... layout in Pages, media browsing, Photoshop, Garage Band or X-Code - is only 2-3 hours. What seems to be different from previous Macbook Pros I have owned is how precipitous this drop-off is between the 'light usage' and real usage. If you are willing to spend your time managing battery life and limiting which software you use, the battery seems capable of impressive times ... BUT if you just get on with doing your thing, this new MacBook Pro's battery time suffers unlike any before.
Bad:
- Battery life in real world usage is very, very disappointing. Granted, if you browse using Safari on non-Flash websites at 50% brightness or so, you can get 7 hours ... however, the drop-off from 7 hours if you do almost anything else is precipitous. Real use battery life - doing something like moderate (not high intensity) ... layout in Pages, media browsing, Photoshop, Garage Band or X-Code - is only 2-3 hours. What seems to be different from previous Macbook Pros I have owned is how precipitous this drop-off is between the 'light usage' and real usage. If you are willing to spend your time managing battery life and limiting which software you use, the battery seems capable of impressive times ... BUT if you just get on with doing your thing, this new MacBook Pro's battery time suffers unlike any before.
The battery life compared to other machines is good, but there is an unfortunate flaws with the way the GPU switches between the integrated and discrete GPUs.
One, from what I recall reading it?s not based on actual graphic usage but on certain process types that trigger the usage. This includes Flash, so even if it?s just a Flash ad or if Flash is idle even though the Safari app is closed it will still be using the dGPU. I wish it was smarter.
Two, Apple only has two options for the dGPU. Either dynamic switching or the dGPU always on. I?d like two things to change here. One being the option to only use the iGP, and the other to auto allow the iGP to run when using battery as the power source and dGPU when plugged in.
Here is a free workaround to increase your battery life.
The battery life compared to other machines is good, but there is an unfortunate flaws with the way the GPU switches between the integrated and discrete GPUs.
...
Here is a free workaround to increase your battery life.
Yes - 3rd party fixes for the lack of GPU control may be the way to go. I'm a little reluctant to use a 3rd party fix for something so low-level in the OS in case it affects the more general performance that I'm very happy with - but I hope that's unfounded.
This sort of thing is the big downside to buying Apple. When it works it *just works* - when it doesn't (and, happily, it's not that often), they mostly refuse to do anything for far too long (as well as trying to deny the issue up to the moment it is fixed). Even when there seems like something obvious they could do to improve things - like an 'always off' option here.
I've owned 5 Mac portables over about 15 years and to be frank, the battery is the one element that has always failed to live up to expectations (even with the understanding that all battery claims are, in general, huge exaggerations). I was very skeptical when Apple went with the non-user-replaceable design but optimistic if it the new batteries were really a significant improvement over previous ones. However, that really doesn't seem to be the case. Granted, they're a bit better, but not to the extent that you don't need a second battery when doing real world tasks on, say, a long flight. Hopefully the claims of longevity are not as caveated.
I've owned 5 Mac portables over about 15 years and to be frank, the battery is the one element that has always failed to live up to expectations (even with the understanding that all battery claims are, in general, huge exaggerations).
They aren?t exaggerations, they are using a specific set of tests. You?ll get what they promise you.
If you want to run Photoshop Garageband and Xcode at the same time that duration will drop significantly. That?s not an exageration on Apple?s part, that?s just the reality of it.
Apple has been making their tests more stringent over the years and announced another change to their battery measurements last year when the introduced the new MBAs which is why the 2011 MBPs have a lower battery duration despite running as long or better than the previous models.
They aren?t exaggerations, they are using a specific set of tests. You?ll get what they promise you.
If you want to run Photoshop Garageband and Xcode at the same time that duration will drop significantly. That?s not an exageration on Apple?s part, that?s just the reality of it.
Apple has been making their tests more stringent over the years and announced another change to their battery measurements last year when the introduced the new MBAs which is why the 2011 MBPs have a lower battery duration despite running as long or better than the previous models.
There's no need to defend Apple to me - obviously I like 'em - I've been using their computers exclusively for over 20 years. Like most other Mac users, I know there's an asterisk that sits beside the claim of 7 hours.
However, as a long time user of Macs, I'm seeing that compared to the way previous Apple batteries performed in real work conditions vs. Apple's use case scenario, these batteries/computers are a bit different. The drop off between light use and real use is much greater. Anyone with previous experience of Apple batteries who is thinking of getting a new one based on the 7 hour claim should be warned: those 7 hours do not scale so well to real work use.
Anyway, just trying to inform. If you don't like the word 'exaggeration', pick another one that you prefer.
[Fyi I wasn't talking about using all those pieces of software at the same time ... just one will do it.]