New Mustang

tmptmp
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
<a href="http://thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=5571"; target="_blank">It's the show car version</a> that will be shown at this years Detroit Auto show, but it gives you an idea of what will be out in 2005. I normally don't care for retro, but this is prettty sweet.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 29
    decent look...but in the end, it's still a mustang...
  • Reply 2 of 29
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    At least they're getting it off that dismal platform it's been on since 1066 or so. The Lincoln LS underpinnings should make it a more agile performer.



    I guess it finally sunk in to Ford HQ that the Mustang is not going to go away, no matter how much they neglect it, so they might as well do something with it.
  • Reply 3 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by Amorph:

    <strong>



    I guess it finally sunk in to Ford HQ that the Mustang is not going to go away, no matter how much they neglect it, so they might as well do something with it. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    how ironic that the people in charge want the same thing i do... <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />
  • Reply 4 of 29
    matsumatsu Posts: 6,558member
    They can either make it good, or just make it go away. While that seems to be an improvement on the current car, the curret car has gone from bad to worse as styling goes.



    We won't know until we can see good pics, but already the wheelbase and the overhangs look wrong in the side profile. From rear three quarters there's a bit of previous generation M3 about the stance, while the front looks a bit like an unglier Allante. Better than what's already around, but not altogether encouraging.
  • Reply 5 of 29
    The recent iterations of the Ford Mustang were outdated technically, and still felt like the awful ?compact? family sedans North American Ford made in the late seventies (Fairmont, etc.).



    The original Mustang was a sporty coupé using components of the then ?compact? Ford Falcon, so it was fairly contemporary to its time (the 1960s).



    If the vehicle on the pictures indeed shares its underpinnings with the Lincoln LS/Jaguar S-Type/T-Bird, then it's certainly closer to the original concept, by being contemporary to its time.

    If the tiny pictures are anything to go by, it doesn't have too much of the retro look which plagues the new T-Bird (the original T-Bird didn't look like something out of the the 1900 or even from the 1930s, now did it?) while it keeps some cues from earlier Mustangs.

    It does look somewhat ?heavy? and squarish to me, but one would need a better quality view of it to judge.

    And anyway there is an ?uglier is better? trend in car design nowadays (Ford is fairly contaminated by this trend), so it could have been far worse.



    [ 12-04-2002: Message edited by: Immanuel Goldstein ]</p>
  • Reply 6 of 29
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    I actually liked the styling of the last 2 major Mustang refreshes. And I like this one too. Like I predicted in the other thread, all the muscle cars are going retro.
  • Reply 7 of 29
    tmptmp Posts: 601member
    The recent iterations of the Mustang were built on a chassis dating from the 70's- the Fox platform that was the basis of the Fairmont. It's one of the reasons that the car stayed around. It was always based on a platform for which the tooling was paid off (Falcon, then Pinto, then Fairmont, now LS)
  • Reply 8 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>Like I predicted in the other thread, all the muscle cars are going retro.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    nothing muscle about it. it's called a pony car...
  • Reply 9 of 29
    I saw this in MotorTrend a while back. It actually looks pretty good, doesn't it?
  • Reply 10 of 29
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    I don't know, I don't like it too much.
  • Reply 11 of 29
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    It looks like a good start, except the nose is flat and disproportionate to the rest of the car. WTF are they gonna put in there, an inline 8?







    And I, for one, like the styling of the new T-Bird.
  • Reply 12 of 29
    g4dudeg4dude Posts: 1,016member
    I like the look of the 99+ but this new one from the pics shown is too plain. Not enough lines or curves. Rather unatractive from the side as well. This is also another blow for Ford in that they are even further destroying Jaguar's image by using the S-Type platform for the Mustang.
  • Reply 13 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by Spart:

    <strong>



    And I, for one, like the styling of the new T-Bird.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    ugh...

    where's that puking smiley when u need it...? <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />
  • Reply 14 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by G4Dude:

    <strong>This is also another blow for Ford in that they are even further destroying Jaguar's image by using the S-Type platform for the Mustang.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Well, the smaller Jaguar X-Type is already a IInd generation Ford Mondeo under the skin.



    That's the way the industry is headed on a world-wide scale.

    Observe the new Opel Vectra/Saab 9-3/next Chevy Malibu and perhaps a future Buick;

    or the Nissan March/next Renault Clio;

    or the Audi A8/WV Phaeton/Bentley GT.



    Expect more common platforms for DaimlerChrysler/Mitsubishi/Hynundai;

    Fiat/GM (EU and US)/Daewoo/Toyota/Subaru;

    WV/Audi/?koda/Seat/Bugatti/Bentley/Porsche;

    not to mention Ford/Mazda/Volvo/Jaguar/Aston-Martin/Land-Rover.



    As the develoment of a new model becomes costlier, even competing (e. g.: those who don't merge with each others) carmakers develop common platforms.



    I suppose that sooner than you think, nearly all cars of a same-size category will be based on one, perhaps two common platforms.
  • Reply 15 of 29
    Ug. The Thunderbird is ugly. This is less ugly, but it's still ugly.



    Why are American car companies going "retro"? Because they have some of the worst design teams on the planet, and plus they want to appeal to their aging markets. Sounds like a plan. At least Cadillac tried something new, albeit silly looking.



    Of course, I shouldn't bite the hand. Ford owns 30.4% of the best car company on the planet.
  • Reply 16 of 29
    Volvo. One damn fine car company. My mom survived a 40 mph broadside collision to the drivers seat door... :eek:
  • Reply 17 of 29
    Actually, Volvo isn't the company I'm thinking of. I'm not one for 5 cylinder engines, or cylinder engines at all, for that matter.
  • Reply 18 of 29
    a10t2a10t2 Posts: 191member
    Mazda? I didn't know Ford had that kind of stake...
  • Reply 19 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by a10t2:

    <strong>Mazda? I didn't know Ford had that kind of stake...</strong><hr></blockquote>





    ford is in complete control of mazda, which is why the company's going down the shitter. they're too afraid to innovate--afraid of progress. hence the lack of rotaries available now, and the overcatious development of the RX-8.

    the list of good jap companies is dwindling...

    oh well. at least honda and toyota are still in complete control, and nissans making a good run w/ the Z. mitsubishi has good shot w/ the EVO once they bring it here. so that leaves poor miserable mazda, which is slowly falling off the map. good ol ford...
  • Reply 20 of 29
    I for one like the direction cadillac is heading. The design isn't silly, its different. I am so tired of the blah curves of the european cars(except for volvo), its getting old. And I am just not a fan of japanese cars... You think GM and Ford are pandering to an aging consumer base, try Toyota. The only japanese car company I've truly been impressed with so far is Nissan, and I think that has more to do with the way they have made a complete rebound over the past few years(plus my sister just got a new pathfinder, and i am really impressed).



    The mustang shown above, is, in my opinion, a relief, but not much more than that. The current mustang is just so trashy looking, inside and out. I don't care if it has a fast engine, the damn thing looks ugly. I wonder if the redesigned mustang will deal with that fact.



    I am eager to see chrysler designs 10 to 20 years down the road once the merger has taken complete effect over their design process. It should be interesting to see what happens.
Sign In or Register to comment.