Racial Profiling is Stupid and Dangerous

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Not only is it a step in the direction of another Holocaust, it simply is not based in reality.



And hasn't anyone noticed that none of the most high-profile arrests; dirty-bomber, shoe-bomber, recent grendade bomber in london; WERE NOT ARAB.



It makes no sense, as <a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/042002sp.htm"; target="_blank">the US Sec. of Transportation points out.</a>



What about all of the asian militant islamists? Black muslims? White europeans? So far, we've seen that every race is involved.



Some examples Mineta points out in the speech above:



[quote]In 1986, a 32-year-old Irish woman, pregnant at the time, was about to board an El Al flight from London to Tel Aviv when El Al security agents discovered an explosive device hidden in the false bottom of her bag. The woman’s boyfriend – the father of her unborn child – had hidden the bomb.



In 1987, a 70-year-old man and a 25-year-old woman – neither of whom were Middle Eastern – posed as father and daughter and brought a bomb aboard a Korean Air flight from Baghdad to Thailand. En route to Bangkok, the bomb exploded, killing all on board.



In 1999, men dressed as businessmen (and one dressed as a Catholic priest) turned out to be terrorist hijackers, who forced an Avianca flight to divert to an airstrip in Colombia, where some passengers were held as hostages for more than a year-and-half.



<hr></blockquote>





Americans are able to make the disctinction between average whites and KKK members.



I think Americans are forgetting the reason racism is so bad: it literally kills millions upon millions of wonderful human beings every year. People literally disemboweled while still living only because they were born a certain color. Have you forgotten what has happen to the Jews, Armenians? Rwanda, Native Americans?!?! We are still struggling to come out of the horrid oppression of Blacks in the US, and now people avdocating regression!



It's easy to be racist when you are a member of the privilaged race.



Advocating racial profiling is very much a form of hate-speech.
«13

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 41
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    You had me with the title.



    You lost me with the first sentence.



    Let's make good points and not be drama queens.
  • Reply 2 of 41
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    I don't know how to resond in a respectful way to such a stupid comment.



    It just goes to show how under-educated Americans really are.



    [ 02-14-2003: Message edited by: giant ]</p>
  • Reply 3 of 41
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    Your subject is racial profiling in the U.S.



    Genocide may be something that happens in modern times where you come from, but around my parts genocide hasn't been en vogue for well nigh 2 centuries.



    Silly to extrapolate U.S. racial profiling to the Holocaust. Borderline disrespectful to Holocaust victims.



    If you were making a general observation, sure I can swing with that, but your point was specific. And by making it specific you ruled out certain things, like bringing up the Holocaust.
  • Reply 4 of 41
    I'm not a huge fan of racial profiling for the same reason I will appear to defend it now. Lemme explain. Most people think racial profiling is some sort of exclusive means of finding the bad guys. That is, we look for people with such-and-such features and everyone else gets a free pass. I think this oversimplifies the purpose and use of racial profiling. It assumes some statistical pattern and uses that as a heads-up when looking for, in this case, a possible terrorist. It does not conclude that only these people are terrorists, nor does it preclude going outside of this pattern to look for these perpetrators.



    The strength of racial profiling is that it has (should have) some sort of statistical analysis to use as an aid to law enforcement. That's just what profiling is in general, and it's a good thing. What's bad, or rather what's at risk is that the people who are supposed to use it merely as a very general aid use it dependently, that they too will think it somehow determines who is a terrorist, drug dealer, smoker, whatever. So as giant said, it fails when the people who are supposed to use it as an instrument of law enforcement instead use it as an instument of punishment. Profiling works with probabilities, it isn't a formula for success.



    I don't know if any of that was clear. <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
  • Reply 5 of 41
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Hyperbolic statement!
  • Reply 6 of 41
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Huh? You mention these high profile arrests of non-Arab criminals. Isn't this an example of how everyone and everything are being scrutinized? It's unracial profiling... <img src="confused.gif" border="0">



    [ 02-14-2003: Message edited by: Eugene ]</p>
  • Reply 7 of 41
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    [quote]Originally posted by groverat:

    <strong>



    Silly to extrapolate U.S. racial profiling to the Holocaust. Borderline disrespectful to Holocaust victims.

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Who the **** are you to talk about respect?!?!?



    Hell, we have engravings hanging outside of Spec Collections her at the Library showing how black men were punished. One of them shows a black man hanging from a tree by a hook through his rib.



    You really are sick, groverat. And don't you dare start preaching to me. Maybe when you get a ****ing life and meet some people that eventually die violently due to racism you will actually get a ****ing clue.
  • Reply 8 of 41
    torifiletorifile Posts: 4,024member
    giant, good idea for a thread. Poor execution. Chill out man. Stay on topic. Don't let grover derail you. Believe it or not, I think he might actually have something useful to contribute to this thread...



    I might post my ideas if this thing turns around.
  • Reply 9 of 41
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Expletive. Expletive. Irrelevant gruesome depiction. Expletive. Accusation made regarding your geographical/historical/situational awareness. Ad-hominem attack.
  • Reply 10 of 41
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    Actually, statistically, as I pointed out, all of the high-profile threats in the American media WERE NOT ARABS. So it makes no sense whatsoever. Period. Even if the next one is Arab, he would still be in the minority in these cases.



    I guess you guys don't know any of the thousands of Arabs that have been harrassed since 9.11. I know a few. Take my ex-girlfriend, fo example. She even Iraqi! But she's a goddamn american. No different than your sister. How many millions of Arabs are there in the US? How would you like to be harrassed and interrogated for hours, just because of the color of your skin? Think about it!
  • Reply 11 of 41
    torifiletorifile Posts: 4,024member
    Haven't we already done this one?



    My major gripe with racial profiling is that it's up to people to act on the (somewhat questionable) statisical findings. It's like the old saying: Guns don't kill people. People do.



    People are giant ****-ups when it comes to judging other people. Give 'em a free ticket to judge others, as racial profiling does, and you're just asking for discrimination and racism to rear their ugly heads. It's like sticking a federal seal of approval on the whole thing and having people accuse others of xy and z just because of their race. Then they can hide behind this stupid "homeland security" bs saying they were just being vigilant. (Does the expression "homeland security" remind anyone else of the nazis?)



    If racial profiling becomes codified and acceptable, we've got a problem. The statistics are flawed (the whole field of stats is one big joke. I can make my data say just about anything I want. And give me a large enough sample size, everything I chose to look for will be there. Trust me.) And the people carrying out these things are also flawed.



    Of course, Eugene is going to come in here and say this and that about some shit and then I'm going to disagree with him and then I'll get frustrated arguing with a privileged minority - as asians in california are - and I'll give up.



    Let's roll.
  • Reply 12 of 41
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    [quote]Originally posted by giant:

    <strong>Actually, statistically, as I pointed out, all of the high-profile threats in the American media WERE NOT ARABS.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Not sure this was stated anywhere really. I see three case studies of where racial profing wouldn't work (and assumably didn't if it was in effect then) which proves that it's not a solution, but doesn't prove the opposite.
  • Reply 13 of 41
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    [quote]Originally posted by BuonRotto:

    <strong>



    Not sure this was stated anywhere really. I see three case studies of where racial profing wouldn't work (and assumably didn't if it was in effect then) which proves that it's not a solution, but doesn't prove the opposite.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    [quote]And hasn't anyone noticed that none of the most high-profile arrests; dirty-bomber, shoe-bomber, recent grendade bomber in london; WERE NOT ARAB.<hr></blockquote>



    [ 02-14-2003: Message edited by: giant ]</p>
  • Reply 13 of 41
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Oh torifile, you know I looooove you.
  • Reply 15 of 41
    powerdocpowerdoc Posts: 8,123member
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>Oh torifile, you know I looooove you.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Good this is Valentine Day (j/K
  • Reply 15 of 41
    torifiletorifile Posts: 4,024member
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>Oh torifile, you know I looooove you.</strong><hr></blockquote>







    Bring it on. I'm ready for you. It's the weekend and I've got no plans.



    &lt;cracking my knuckles&gt;
  • Reply 17 of 41
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    [quote]<strong>Who the **** are you to talk about respect?!?!?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I'm talking about how people trivialize the deaths of 6 million Jews to gripe about a policy that isn't even officially in place that has caused the deaths of very few, if any at all.



    It's disrespectful to their suffering to use it as a weapon.



    [quote]<strong>Hell, we have engravings hanging outside of Spec Collections her at the Library showing how black men were punished. One of them shows a black man hanging from a tree by a hook through his rib.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Do you know what genocide is?

    There is a difference between situational murders based on race and genocide.



    [quote]<strong>You really are sick, groverat. And don't you dare start preaching to me. Maybe when you get a ****ing life and meet some people that eventually die violently due to racism you will actually get a ****ing clue.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Who is preaching, outrage-boy?



    I'm aware of my region's very checkerd and shameful past with regard to race relations, but I'm also aware that it wasn't genocide. I know more about racist Southern hate crimes than you ever will.



    Racial profiling in the U.S. is stupid and dangerous, but it's not the start of a slippery slope to gas-chamebered concentration camps.
  • Reply 18 of 41
    Never mind.



    [ 02-14-2003: Message edited by: MrBillData ]</p>
  • Reply 19 of 41
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    [quote]Do you know what genocide is?

    <hr></blockquote>



    Yes I do, on a PERSONAL level from several fronts. Which is why you need to get a clue. Genocide is very real.



    [quote]Racial profiling in the U.S. is stupid and dangerous, but it's not the start of a slippery slope to gas-chamebered concentration camps.<hr></blockquote>



    Um...yes it is. We've already had the racial profiling and concentration camps here in the US.



    Regardless of anything, it's oppression and demonization people with a certain amount of color in their skin. And that's just the very beginning!



    [ 02-14-2003: Message edited by: giant ]</p>
  • Reply 20 of 41
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    So add three more to the beat-the-profile list. I'm not arguing that racial profiling isn't fool-proof nor that it isn't dangerous. I'm arguing that none of this proves the opposite, that arabs are not our greatest threat right now. You have six mentions of non-arab arrests, and obviously there are plenty of others. We have 19 arab men boarding planes and flying them into buildings. We had a sniper in the Washington DC area. Everyone was looking for white serial or militia member. They were wrong. We could go back and forth on this. This isn't the point I'm making.



    One thing a LOT (again, not all) these people have in common is belief in fundamental Islam. Perhaps we should be using religious profiling?



    Profiling itself isn't inherently bad. Using it as a crutch and as a misleading means of finding these people is bad. I agree that racial profiling is the wrong avenue here.



    [ 02-14-2003: Message edited by: BuonRotto ]</p>
Sign In or Register to comment.