Mitt Romney becomes first politician to use Apple's iAd service

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney's camp on Friday announced that he will be taking his campaign to iPhone, iPad and iPod touch users nationwide using Apple's iAd, making him the first politico to advertise through the service since it was introduced in 2010.

Romney's decision to use iAd is indicative of a trend toward mobile advertising, reports The Wall Street Journal, as President Barack Obama is also using ad networks to effectively target key demographics in a run up to the 2012 election.

Both parties are said to be leveraging demographic and geographic data mined by a variety of digital ad companies in hopes of swaying voters in swing states. An Apple spokesperson said that Romney's iAds are the first of their kind.

Zac Moffatt, the Romney campaign's digital director, believes that people will "spend more time" with the iAds and said that the campaign will be experimenting with the mobile push leading up to the Republican convention in August. The camp is also using Google's mobile network to get information to Android users, effectively covering the entire smartphone market.

President Obama's campaign declined to divulge what mobile and internet ad resources it was using, but online ads for the incumbent Democrat have been seen on Google's network.

According to data compiled by Romney's digital team, mobile users drove a large amount of the traffic seen by the campaign's website and a majority of those visitors were using Apple devices.

Moffatt sees smartphone users as a captive audience, saying that a handset is "the most personal device you carry. We felt like we wanted to connect with people where they spend their time."

Romney
Screenshot from an upcoming Romney iAd video. | Source: WSJ


The Romney ads will initially coexist with traditional media and are slated to show up only on iPhones and iPads in states where concurrent TV spots are being run. Content will be interactive and are set to feature embedded videos as well as a link to download the "With Mitt" photo-sharing app.

"We're not looking to replace TV but to augment and amplify [it]," Moffatt said.

Apple's iAd service was at one time seen as a "billion dollar opportunity" due to the large installed base of iOS users, but slow adoption and diminishing interest forced the company to drop ad prices. The system was revamped and developer revenue increased from 60 percent to 70 percent earlier in 2012 to rekindle interest in the service.

According to a report by Borrell Associates campaigns and outside groups will spend just $159 million on digital advertising this year, a far cry from the estimated $7 billion expected to spent by the end of the race. As mobile devices proliferate and politicians learn more about the effectiveness of mobile advertising, services like iAd will likely account for an increasing amount of campaign spending. Both the Romney and Obama camps declined to disclose how much they plan to spend on mobile ads for 2012.

The iAd campaign is scheduled to kick-off next week.
«13456

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 109
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Ladies and gentlemen, watch as this thread instantly gets off its real topic… image

  • Reply 2 of 109
    drblankdrblank Posts: 3,385member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    Ladies and gentlemen, watch as this thread instantly gets off its real topic… image



    Well, Romney using iAd isn't going to necessarily get my vote.  Obama may not get my vote either.  I am still undecided.   Was that quick enough?  I don't want to disappoint anyone.  Just trying to help.

  • Reply 3 of 109
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    I bet Apple is pleased about it because of the additional coverage it will get for iAds.
  • Reply 4 of 109
    drblankdrblank Posts: 3,385member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by drblank View Post


    Well, Romney using iAd isn't going to necessarily get my vote.  Obama may not get my vote either.  I am still undecided.   Was that quick enough?  I don't want to disappoint anyone.  Just trying to help.



    But if Obama releases a moratorium against Android phones and Windows and standardizes on Apple products for the Feds, I might be persuaded to vote for Obama. 

  • Reply 5 of 109


    Only in Amercia

  • Reply 6 of 109
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by GadgetCanada View Post


    Only in Amercia

     

    LoL. Amercia. Only in Canada
  • Reply 7 of 109


    Mitt is Shit. VOTE RON PAUL! If Ron Paul had the money he would have an iAd campaign too! Vote for Obama over Mitt Romney. Fucking Mormon. More like moron.

  • Reply 8 of 109
    charlitunacharlituna Posts: 7,217member


    so what the rules about donation links in Ads

  • Reply 9 of 109
    studentxstudentx Posts: 112member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Splash-reverse View Post

     

    LoL. Amercia. Only in Canada

     

    Canada is a territory of the US much like Putero Rico.
  • Reply 10 of 109
    entropysentropys Posts: 4,152member
    I take issue a bit with the [I]diminishing interest[/I] in iAds statement. It was pretty clearly set up at first as an experiment that would only appeal to a select group of advertisers with very deep pockets. It even required Apple participation in the development of the Ad.

    So the next phase is lower the price and open it up more so that even political campaigns can use it.

    That said, I don't use ad based apps, so I have never seen an iAd. And I don't want to.
  • Reply 11 of 109
    adam_apple wrote: »
    Mitt is Shit. VOTE RON PAUL! If Ron Paul had the money he would have an iAd campaign too! Vote for Obama over Mitt Romney. Fucking Mormon. More like moron.
    Hellooooo, bigotry.
  • Reply 12 of 109
    anantksundaramanantksundaram Posts: 20,403member
    Ladies and gentlemen, watch as this thread instantly gets off its real topic… :lol:

    You were, unfortunately, right.

    Ugh.
  • Reply 13 of 109
    cvaldes1831cvaldes1831 Posts: 1,832member


    LOL, I'm not sure if I can remember a single ad campaign from an iOS device (I bought the original iPod touch and since then have moved to an iPad and iPhone).


     


    Some people might say, "well, it's because you run a DNS cache-poisoning script on your home router which effectively blocks all ads to everything on your subnet." 


     


    Yes, but I also get unfiltered Internet at my work's public WiFi network as well as anyplace else other than work or home. I know I am seeing ads, I just don't remember any of them.

  • Reply 14 of 109
    dsosamac wrote: »
    Hellooooo, bigotry.

    It's not like he was commenting on someone's sex, sexuality, race, age, etc... Religion is a choice. Fair game to hate on someone's silly and irrational beliefs.

    All religions are silly and unnecessary in this day and age. I'm understating this.

    But yeah, um, iAd.

    ps- Mormons officially believed black people were the DEVIL until 1978. So let's talk some more about bigotry, eh?
  • Reply 15 of 109
    Ugh. Topics like these never end well. I hope it's put out of its misery quick.
  • Reply 16 of 109
    wookie01wookie01 Posts: 54member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by charlituna View Post


    so what the rules about donation links in Ads



    Exactly what I thought, I hope Apple are going to collect 30% of all donations to political parties :-)

  • Reply 17 of 109

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post



    President Obama's campaign declined to divulge what mobile and internet ad resources it was using, but online ads for the incumbent Democrat have been seen on Google's network.


    Let's take a note here that the Obama campaign is being very circumspect on its digital marketing. Romney did want to increase his "hip" factor, though.

  • Reply 18 of 109
    dluxdlux Posts: 666member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Filmantopia View Post





    Religion is a choice.


     


    Actually, for some people, it's not:


     


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam#Execution


     


    Obviously this is an extremist's position, but those people still exist in abundance, sadly.

  • Reply 19 of 109
    Ya' know. We have TWO presidential candidates vying for the same job who BOTH claim to be believers in heir own arguably nutty/controversial religion. Obama's no atheist, at least that's what he tells voters.
  • Reply 20 of 109
    at least that's what he tells voters.

    Right. Pretty sure he's an atheist at heart.
Sign In or Register to comment.