New York magazine's new iPad app looks to define the future of print + digital publishing

Posted:
in iPad edited January 2014
Timed with the magazine's 45th anniversary, New York is set to launch a newly redesigned iPad app that takes full advantage of Apple's iOS platform, and could serve as the new standard bearer for print magazines on tablets.

NYMag


AppleInsider was given an early hands-on look at the revamped New York magazine for iPad this week at the publication's New York City headquarters. While New York has had an iPad edition available to subscribers for years, NYmag.com General Manager Michael Silberman admitted the previous software hadn't used Apple's tablet to its full potential.

That's why in 2012, they partnered with developer The Wonderfactory to build a new iOS Newsstand application based on Bonnier's Mag+ digital publishing platform. The result is New York's completely revamped software, which is scheduled to hit the App Store April 1, with a few twists that make it a standout experience for the iPad.The defining feature of New York's new app is the "window shade," which allows users to quickly jump between the magazine and the latest news.

Upon launching the new application, readers will see a unique user interface designed to give iPad users easy access to both the latest news, as well as a version of the latest issue of New York, tweaked specifically to take advantage of the iPad's form factor and display.

This split design is accomplished by a movable bar ? a UI element referred to internally as the "window shade" ? that divides the page into an upper half, featuring the latest news curated from NYmag.com, and a lower half, which offers access to the weekly magazine issue. Users simply drag the bar up or down to choose which material they wish to read, and the bar can be quickly pulled to the other side of the screen to switch.

NYMag
A closer look at the "window shade" feature that divides the latest news from the newest issue of New York magazine.


The idea, Silberman explained while demonstrating the application, is to keep readers engaged with New York's content on a daily basis. While the print magazine and its digital counterpart are published weekly, users can also use the same app to stay up to date with the latest exclusive Web content that supplements the print edition.

That's not to say the "Latest News" portion of the app is simply an embedded version of NYmag.com. Select stories from the magazine's website, as well as excerpts from the full magazine, are curated and presented with a new look designed just for the app, and five days' worth of stories are also downloaded for offline reading.

"We want users to come to the app many times throughout the day for our unique take on news, politics, entertainment, fashion and food," Silberman said. "The most successful apps serve users on their own schedule, not tied to a weekly or monthly magazine publishing cycle. The app is especially tailored to meet the content consumption needs, habits and expectations of today's tablet audience."

The ad-supported content will be available to anyone who downloads the free app from Apple's iOS Newsstand. The hope of Silberman and others is that the quality of the free content will encourage readers to slide the app's window shade up to access the bottom half of the app ? and subscribe to the weekly edition.

Those who do subscribe will find that the digital reproduction of the weekly publication has also been redesigned for the iPad. Unlike some other magazines, which essentially present themselves as page-by-page PDF file scans, each issue of New York will be tweaked and redesigned for an ideal tablet reading experience."The most successful apps serve users on their own schedule, not tied to a weekly or monthly magazine publishing cycle." - NYmag.com General Manager Michael Silberman

In demonstrating a recent issue to AppleInsider, Silberman showed how everything from the magazine's cover to articles and regular features within were changed in varying ways from print to iPad. Flipping to the left and right brings up individual articles within the magazine, and from there users can scroll down to dive deeper into the page.

Content can also be modified to work even better on the iPad than in print, if need be. Silberman said New York plans to have the iPad version of all of its restaurant reviews include controllable 360-degree photographs that will give readers a feel for the location. Some stories will also have embedded video, and that content will not be available on the magazine's website, remaining exclusive to the iPad.

The magazine also recently consolidated its weekly "To Do" section, an acknowledgement of the fact that most users simply go to the Web if they want to find an exhaustive list of upcoming events. But in the iPad app, the weekly "To Do" list is accompanied by a special search box that lets readers find more options right within the digital magazine.

In another example of changes from print to iPad, an article in one issue about former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was merely a small sidebar in the print edition. But the ability to enhance the content on the iPad with larger graphics and interactivity led to a full-page item in the digital copy.

Other features include a quick "scrub" option at the bottom of the screen that shows thumbnails of pages throughout the issue, while a top menu features a quick table of contents. The digital edition demonstrated to AppleInsider on a third-generation iPad with Retina display was more responsive than many other laggy magazines and newspapers currently available on Newsstand.

New York also worked with their development team to reduce the size of individual magazine issues. These can still be a relatively hefty download at 300-plus-megabytes, but that can be less than half the size of issues provided by some other magazine apps.

When the updated New York magazine application launches in Newsstand April 1, it will come with the April 8 annual edition marking the publication's 45-year anniversary since its first issue dated April 8, 1968. Recurring monthly subscriptions through Apple's Newsstand will cost $1.99 per month, or $19.99 per year, while a print and digital option will also be available to readers for an additional $10.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 15
    tylerk36tylerk36 Posts: 1,037member


    Nice.  Makes me want to get a subscription.

  • Reply 2 of 15
    Sounds cool. Hope more magazines go this route. (I'm looking at YOU, PixelMags!)
  • Reply 3 of 15
    tp398tp398 Posts: 2member
    Sounds not dissimilar to The Week, a British weekly print also available through Newstand. This has a daily news update in addition to the weekly digital magazine which provides a round up of UK & World news from online & print media from across the globe.
  • Reply 4 of 15
    lightknightlightknight Posts: 2,312member
    "Print magazines on tablets"? As in, put your paper version on top of the iPad or something?
  • Reply 5 of 15
    vorsosvorsos Posts: 302member


    About time a major company dropped the 'identical to print layout' ideology that meant 500MB PDFs.

  • Reply 6 of 15
    retrogustoretrogusto Posts: 1,111member
    This was sounding pretty good until they said that the issues would be 300 Mb. I was hoping to replace the paper issues completely, but I don't think I can be bothered to download and retain that much data each week. Why can't everybody do what the Economist does, or at least offer it as an option? Those issues download in a few seconds even on my crappy home DSL, so they can't be more than a few megabytes.
  • Reply 7 of 15


    Unless these app-based publications -- this one, WSJ, NYT, The Economist, etc come to mind -- start to allow reader comments to be posted and shown, their own web-based offerings will be their worst competitor.


     


    Yes, a lot of reader comments are silly or biased, but I find that there are often far greater nuggets of truth and wisdom in that occasional response that makes it worth it. (Much like the AI stories and the comments they elicit). Especially, given that so much of what passes of for reporting today, even among the so-called elite media, is shallow, drive-by, "quote an analyst or expert", Wikipedia-based nonsense.


     


    Until they can incorporate comments in a complete way, they're really not ready for prime time. At least, not for me.

  • Reply 8 of 15

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post


    Unless these app-based publications -- this one, WSJ, NYT, The Economist, etc come to mind -- start to allow reader comments to be posted and shown, their own web-based offerings will be their worst competitor.


     


    Yes, a lot of reader comments are silly or biased, but I find that there are often far greater nuggets of truth and wisdom in that occasional response that makes it worth it. (Much like the AI stories and the comments they elicit). Especially, given that so much of what passes of for reporting today, even among the so-called elite media, is shallow, drive-by, "quote an analyst or expert", Wikipedia-based nonsense.


     


    Until they can incorporate comments in a complete way, they're really not ready for prime time. At least, not for me.



    I agree with you...AI is the first place I go, and I read the comments. MacWorld is second, but more often than not, there are no comments. Even though Macworld has the capability.

  • Reply 9 of 15
    It all sounded great until they raved about a full page of Dick Brain Cheney.
  • Reply 10 of 15
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    Looks innovative. Print publications have to become more strategic risk-takers if they are to survive this colossal shift from print to "e"-everything.
  • Reply 11 of 15
    bigmikebigmike Posts: 266member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post


    Unless these app-based publications -- this one, WSJ, NYT, The Economist, etc come to mind -- start to allow reader comments to be posted and shown, their own web-based offerings will be their worst competitor.


     


    Yes, a lot of reader comments are silly or biased, but I find that there are often far greater nuggets of truth and wisdom in that occasional response that makes it worth it. (Much like the AI stories and the comments they elicit). Especially, given that so much of what passes of for reporting today, even among the so-called elite media, is shallow, drive-by, "quote an analyst or expert", Wikipedia-based nonsense.


     


    Until they can incorporate comments in a complete way, they're really not ready for prime time. At least, not for me.



     


    Maybe they don't want their mag to get flooded with crappy comments. I think it's nice to keep things clean once in a while. It's a classic magazine. They don't need to let readers spew their words all over the place. They're already prime time. People who don't want to subscribe to them don't have to. It's a beautiful thing.

  • Reply 12 of 15

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by bigmike View Post


    Maybe they don't want their mag to get flooded with crappy comments. I think it's nice to keep things clean once in a while. It's a classic magazine. They don't need to let readers spew their words all over the place. They're already prime time. People who don't want to subscribe to them don't have to. It's a beautiful thing.



    Uh uh. People who don't want to read the comments don't have to. It's an even more beautiful thing.


     


    As an aside, New York is "prime time" for those whose worldview lives between Lexington and 5th, and between 45th and 75th. image

  • Reply 13 of 15
    ankleskaterankleskater Posts: 1,287member
    This is bring launched on April 1st? Hmmm ...
  • Reply 14 of 15

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post


    Uh uh. People who don't want to read the comments don't have to. It's an even more beautiful thing.


     


    As an aside, New York is "prime time" for those whose worldview lives between Lexington and 5th, and between 45th and 75th. image



     






    Uh uh. People who don't want to be constantly bombarded with social media BS in aps shouldn't have to. That's the most beautiful idea of all.

  • Reply 15 of 15
    sofyesofye Posts: 2member
    Sometimes at work I use Evernote to take notes, but is true during meetings, for my iPad project management, I prefer use Beesy: http://www.beesapps.com/ipad-project-beesy/. It's a really good app for work, help to sort out and don't forget a thing on my differents projects. Very useful also in meeting, I can import, annotate and share my files with people. Take note and send minutes at the end of the meeting by mail very quickly and easily.

    I discovered this tool on Picks Evernote, so I think it's can be interesting.

    Sofye
Sign In or Register to comment.