Apple paces field in PC consumer satisfaction for 11th consecutive year

Posted:
in iPhone edited September 2014
Despite booking a modest 3 percent year-over-year decline, Apple has once again claimed the top spot in the most recent American Customer Satisfaction Index rankings of personal computer manufacturers.

The American Customer Satisfaction Index's 2014 PC consumer satisfaction ratings
The American Customer Satisfaction Index's 2014 PC consumer satisfaction ratings


Apple's aggregate score of 84 -- down from 87 one year ago -- was enough to maintain a two-point lead over a gaggle of smaller companies, including Samsung, Lenovo, and Asus, which combined to score 82 points. Scores for those smaller firms were up 8 percent year-over-year.

The gap widens from there to Texas-based giant Dell, which scored 76 to come in third. Acer, Toshiba, and beleaguered Hewlett-Packard round out the top five.

Surprisingly, consumers showed a renewed interest in desktop computers. Satisfaction with those wall-bound machines ticked up by 3 percent year-over-year, compared to dips of 4 percent and 1 percent for laptops and tablets, respectively.

"The increase in customer satisfaction for PCs could mean two different things," ACSI Chairman and founder Claes Fornell said in a release. "Either the product is seen as more attractive now and is poised for a comeback, or it has higher customer satisfaction simply because those who were less than happy with it have moved to other devices. If dissatisfied customers leave and satisfied customers stay, average satisfaction may well go up."

The ACSI surveys some 70,000 consumers each year, benchmarking satisfaction with their most-used products and services. Those surveys have given Apple the top spot in the personal computer satisfaction rankings -- which also includes tablets -- in every ranking since 2004.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 21
    bad math. why round samsung and others in into the "other" category before the compare?

    the way this is setup, it would be possible for samsung to have a higher number than apple but one would never know because of the way it's rolled up.
  • Reply 2 of 21
    mpantonempantone Posts: 2,040member

    Samsung sells very few PCs in the USA.

     

    The more unusual omission is lumping Lenovo in the "All Others" category.

  • Reply 3 of 21
    boredumbboredumb Posts: 1,418member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by schlack View Post



    bad math. why round samsung and others in into the "other" category before the compare?



    the way this is setup, it would be possible for samsung to have a higher number than apple but one would never know because of the way it's rolled up.

    Someone or ones would almost have to be higher for this arithmetic...

    Also, when I subtract 76 from 82, ! keep getting 6, not 8...I'll probably have to reinstall

    my OS, bringing Apple's score even lower...

  • Reply 4 of 21
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by boredumb View Post

     

    Someone or ones would almost have to be higher for this arithmetic...

    Also, when I subtract 76 from 82, ! keep getting 6, not 8...I'll probably have to reinstall

    my OS, bringing Apple's score even lower...


    I'm also having that problem with almost all their numbers: 80 minus 74 keeps coming up as 6 when clearly it's 8%.  78 minus 75 keeps showing up as 3 when it's obviously 4.

     

    My suggestion, if you're going to completely make up numbers to get press at least make the math work. We can check that ourselves. We don't really have a way to double check their ratings but I'm sure they must be accurate.

  • Reply 5 of 21
    It's a percentage not a straight addition or subtraction. Lol.

    Ie: 76 x 1.08 = ~82

    This is how you check each column. 1.08 represents adding the original number 8% which gives you the shown results. Try to think a bit before you post people.
  • Reply 6 of 21
    Please think before you scurry to correct people who know mathematics better than you.

    8% of 76 is ~6

    You don't just add/subtract the old value from the new one. They are showing the percentage of the increase not the exact value of the increase.

    Easy method: 76 x 1.08 = ~ 82
  • Reply 7 of 21

    It's % increase, not difference between old number and 100%. I'm guessing they are rounding on all numbers as well... 

  • Reply 8 of 21
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Meanwhile MacRumors is running a click bait Business Insider worthy story about the new iPhones prone to bending. All based on a couple anecdotes but giving the impression the phones bend if you look at them wrong. Bugs the crap out of me that websites rush to create "gates" all in the name of page views. :rolleyes:
  • Reply 9 of 21
    rogifan wrote: »
    Meanwhile MacRumors is running a click bait Business Insider worthy story about the new iPhones prone to bending. All based on a couple anecdotes but giving the impression the phones bend if you look at them wrong. Bugs the crap out of me that websites rush to create "gates" all in the name of page views. :rolleyes:

    Clickbaiters... Can't live with 'em, can't DDOS 'em.
  • Reply 10 of 21

    The numbers are just fine. The percent change is calculated as a percent that the change is of the original standing.

     

    A decrease of 6 is actually 8% of the original value of the 82.

     

    Imagine if the rating decreased from 2% to 1%. According to your logic, that would represent a decrease of 1%, when in fact only half as may people would now be satisfied. If something decreases by half, that is a 50% decrease.

     

    It might help to think of the satisfaction ratings as scores out of 100 rather than as percents. If your score went fro 82 to 76, you would have a decrease of 6 points, but a percentage decrease of 8%.

  • Reply 11 of 21
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Clickbaiters... Can't live with 'em, can't DDOS 'em.
    MacRumors should know better. We're really supposed to believe no one at Apple did any stress tests on these phones? Or they did and signed off on phones that could easily bend? I mean that's just ridiculous. Like BGR freaking out over the camera bulge when in reality it's hardly noticeable. Heck even wonder boy Mark a Gurman thinks the camera bulge complaints are overblown.
  • Reply 12 of 21
    paxmanpaxman Posts: 4,729member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

    Surprisingly, consumers showed a renewed interest in desktop computers. Satisfaction with those wall-bound machines ticked up by 3 percent year-over-year, compared to dips of 4 percent and 1 percent for laptops and tablets, respectively.

    I am not surprised because generally speaking and specially for the iMac, a good desktop computer offer the best computing experience for desk bound activity. Perhaps the satisfaction ratings reflect that when people buy a desk based computer these days they do it because they know it is what they need. Laptops have taken over and desktops are in the minority. For my money the iMac is the king of the desk.

  • Reply 13 of 21
    I wonder what would be the "consumer satisfaction index" if you ask us, owners of Macbook Pro Early 2011 edition...There are thousands and thousands of reports all over the world about the GPU failure - a clear design and manufacturing error - and Apple is just ignoring us all, who have been loyal customers for decades, with several other products bought (iphones, ipads, ipods). There are groups on Facebook about this, with several stories about Apple tech centers acknowledging the issue as a known factor but no recalls or support actions from Apple, only expensive repair costs that prove to fail again and again. And according to Tim Cook's own words: "And frankly, we don't settle for anything less than excellence in every group in the company, and we have the self-honesty to admit when we're wrong and the courage to change.". Well, where is this "self-honest and courage" now? I and thousands around the world don't see it!
  • Reply 14 of 21
    boredumbboredumb Posts: 1,418member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post

    Meanwhile MacRumors is running a click bait Business Insider worthy story...

    I wonder why they call it "MacRumors"...?

  • Reply 15 of 21

    +1!  2300 euros for a laptop that isn't expected to live more than 3 years even according to some of their tech support...

    tisk tisk apple, gave me dat wallet ache / summertime sadness 

  • Reply 16 of 21

    Apple doesn't need to satisfy their current loyal customers because there will always be someone ready to take their place. They deny their mistakes and move on. They still have not admitted fault in the thousands of dead 2011 MacBook Pros. No matter where we turn we are told we are isolated cases or there are not enough of us to be a problem. Apple is not interested in the 15,000 plus signatures on the petition by owners of dead Macs all over the world, and has yet to open their mouth.



    When I made it far up the ladder of customer service I told them I own TWO dead 2011 MacBooks, bought in two different cities and six months apart. One died just over 3 years and the other died at 2 1/2 years. I was informed there are no recalls because they have no record of a widespread problem and there is no manufacturing defect. I replied to him that APPLE may think it is a tiny percentage, but to ME it is NOT. I have TWO dead 2011 MacBooks and that is 100% failure in my book and no coincidence. 



    Apple Customer service suggests I sink another $610 to fix the $3600 I spent. No thank you.



    No new iphone6 for me.

  • Reply 17 of 21
    reynaldo wrote: »
    I wonder what would be the "consumer satisfaction index" if you ask us, owners of Macbook Pro Early 2011 edition...There are thousands and thousands of reports all over the world about the GPU failure - a clear design and manufacturing error - and Apple is just ignoring us all, who have been loyal customers for decades, with several other products bought (iphones, ipads, ipods). There are groups on Facebook about this, with several stories about Apple tech centers acknowledging the issue as a known factor but no recalls or support actions from Apple, only expensive repair costs that prove to fail again and again. And according to Tim Cook's own words: "And frankly, we don't settle for anything less than excellence in every group in the company, and we have the self-honesty to admit when we're wrong and the courage to change.". Well, where is this "self-honest and courage" now? I and thousands around the world don't see it!
    Have you ever wondered what goes into setting up a recall program? Apple, like any responsible company, doesn't want to eat the cost of defective components they themselves didn't make. The failures you are referring to (and I have a 2011 MBP on my bench that failed from the same thing), is related to the AMD Radeon GPU component of the motherboard. As with other recall programs, Apple is probably trying to pressure AMD into taking the hit for this defect, and they won't announce a recall program until things are ready. And in most cases, Apple does tend to refund those who paid for replacements out-of-pocket before the recall is activated.
  • Reply 18 of 21

    Well, you certainly have a different perception of "responsibility" than me. AMD is Apple's problem, not mine. They have a B2B relationship. My relationship with Apple is a B2C. I bought from Apple. On a Apple store. An Apple product, designed and tested(?) by Apple with Apple Care. So you say "Apple is probably trying to pressure AMD". It may or may not be true. In any case, thousands of loyal customesr who have paid for a premium product ("pro") are now without their work main tool - and the worse, at least for me - no information or position from Apple so far. If you read articles on this you will see that this issue started, as a mass issue, around last year's end. So far, nothing from Apple. Tim Cook mentioned "excellence"and "self-honest to admit when they are wrong"...that is what these thousands of people are waiting for(or paying expensive to fix it, sometimes more than once! I am not confident to pay around US$ 1,200 (official price provided by an authorized Apple Center here in Brazil) for a 3 month warranted fix that several people are reporting that does not fix it at all). have a look at https://www.facebook.com/groups/2011mbp/ or at http://www.change.org/p/timothy-d-cook-replace-or-fix-all-2011-macbook-pro-with-graphics-failure

  • Reply 19 of 21
    Sales are down because Apple hasnt offered up a reason ti buy a new macbook laptop or any new mac so far this year.
  • Reply 20 of 21
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,324moderator
    Apple's aggregate score of 84 -- down from 87 one year ago -- was enough to maintain a two-point lead over a gaggle of smaller companies, including Samsung, Lenovo, and Asus, which combined to score 82 points.

    Samsung has also just decided to stop selling laptops in Europe entirely now including Chromebooks:

    http://www.theverge.com/2014/9/23/6834755/samsung-to-end-laptop-sales-in-europe

    Samsung's Chromebooks were among the most popular Chromebooks. I suspect they will eventually drop their entire PC lineup worldwide because they don't need it.

    Apple's playing a shrewd game on the PC side because the PC manufacturers are all competing against each other cutting margins to unsustainable levels, cutting quality and service while Apple just sits back and reaps the profits and nothing the PC manufacturers do is making a dent. They gained this privileged position due to their integrated business model.

    "When you engage in actual fighting, if victory is long in coming, then men's weapons will grow dull and their ardor will be damped. If you lay siege to a town, you will exhaust your strength.

    Now, when your weapons are dulled, your ardor damped, your strength exhausted and your treasure spent, other chieftains will spring up to take advantage of your extremity. Then no man, however wise, will be able to avert the consequences that must ensue."
Sign In or Register to comment.