Sign the Petition

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
I'm new to these boards, but just thought I would pass this out as I'm sure some of you may wish to sign...



<a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/iTol/petition.html"; target="_blank">Petition</a>



Correct the URL...



[ 07-17-2002: Message edited by: airfail ]</p>
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 28
    Boycot it yourself! I will just let my account run out. ( I never ONCE used it myself so what is the big F*cking deal? ) Though it's 'clever' thing, you don't "need" the .mac. If you don't want it, don't use it, or don't need it, just DON'T sign up. All I ask is that folks not blast Apple for it because if I was in there place I'd do the same thing.
  • Reply 2 of 28
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    No matter how unhappy you are (I am too, but slowly I'm getting over it) having people sign a petition won't do crap. Just suck it up and deal.
  • Reply 3 of 28
    cubitcubit Posts: 846member
    [quote]Originally posted by airfail:

    <strong>I'm new to these boards, but just thought I would pass this out as I'm sure some of you may wish to sign...



    <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/iTol/petition.html"; target="_blank">Petition</a>



    Correct the URL...



    [ 07-17-2002: Message edited by: airfail ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    AH! Now I know we are in NYC! Come up to the Upper West Side and there are a zillion others you can sign,



    "...Sine petitionus:
  • Reply 4 of 28
    Great googoly moogoly.



    That thing reads like it was written by a 13-year-old! <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />



    I wouldn't touch that monstrosity with a 10-meter pole!
  • Reply 5 of 28
    pb g3pb g3 Posts: 95member
    Yeah apple, generating revenue sounds like a terrible idea
  • Reply 6 of 28
    rickagrickag Posts: 1,626member
    I guess I'm missing something here.



    If you are on the internet, persumably you already have an email address, or multiple email addresses?



    If you don't, you may want to change the IPS provider you have, but I thought all IPS's provided some sort of email address????



    Also, don't some services like iWon or Yahoo provide free email addresses??



    What am I missing??
  • Reply 7 of 28
    tulkastulkas Posts: 3,757member
    Wow.





    That petition is the biggest pile of whining rot I have read in a while. With the dot com bust, didn't we all lose free services? Have none of these people had to change their email addy before? If you don't want .mac, then don't pay for it. If you want free email, use Hotmail of yahoo (though hotmail ain't what it used to be and will soon be pretty much unusable except for paid users I think).



    If Apple can no longer afford to continue to offer these services for free, what would you prefer they do? Cancel the services entirely? When all those dot com freebies died off, we didn't get the chance to pay for their services, they just stopped.



    Does anyone bitching understand how a marKet economy works? At it's most basic, it mean "YOU GET WHAT YOU F*CKING PAY FOR!!!"



    If Apple was to start giving away free iPods with every TiBook and hyped it as an advantage, these same people would bitch when Apple stopped. And you know Apple would have to stop...it's would unreasonably drain resources from the company.



    get a grip people.
  • Reply 8 of 28
    donnydonny Posts: 231member
    I think Apple is taking a chance to anger many Mac users, and obviously, it is apparent many users are upset immediately. It would have been better for them to offer us choices. They gave us a do or die ultimatum. It is their company, software, and right (to do with it all as they please...). However, they are a company, and they depend on users who buy and use their products. Yes, Jobs did say we had the e-mail address for life. I have used this line to persuade many users to switch or consider the Mac platform. I try to show them how well Apple treats its customers.



    I think Apple should have left the basic options of iTools alone as it starts .Mac. Then, they could charge for advanced, other, or broader services. No one would be upset. It would cost them the same amount of money as it is costing to maintain the services now. Plus, they would begin gaining additional income as people join. If the Mac population is angered to black-listing this service, it will have a hard start, and it may not be able to take off at all. The Mac user base is fickle and touchy about their products. For some reason, we take it as ours. We did not make the machine. We do not design the software. We just buy and use it. However, it is personal to us, and this spirt helps propel the Mac platform. It will draw people to it, also.



    I think 100.00 will be great in a year or two from now. For now, it is ridiculous, and it is taking away something which was free at 8am today (well..'till Sept 30 midnight...). If the e-mail address, alone, was left untouched by the demand for a price on the service, people may complain (they always do...), but I doubt there would be a petition and such an outrage.



    There should be several choices along a few price points. It is good business. The service should increase, and they could charge at this new level. They should not be making an underlying demand to their user-base. We have no other choice--pay or lose it. I do not use it enough to justify paying, and therefore if things remain the same, I will lose hours of work on pages, have to change my address over many web pages (where I am a member or receive aa news letter), and spend some effort backing up this data before it is gone. I have 75 days. It is plenty of time, and Apple has a right to make this choice. But I think it is a poor choice overall. We would be more likely to focus on the possible benifits if we did not feel cheated by it. I am not saying we are cheated by it. it was a nice gift to be free for so long. however, I do understand the outrage, and I cannot say I am happy with Apple's choice at all.
  • Reply 9 of 28
    marcusmarcus Posts: 227member
    I was one of the first to sign the petition...at first glance it seems abit rough of Apple to charge for the iTools functionality after saying that it was 'free for life'...



    However i signed up..it would have been alot of hassle to change all my work things to another address....and I have to say that .mac is actually a pretty sweet set up...



    Back up is 'very' polished, and when syncing with work/home machines is introduced it will be even better...



    I paid £30, and for that price it is not that bafd a pill to swallow...



    Marc
  • Reply 10 of 28
    eupfhoriaeupfhoria Posts: 257member
    I echo donny's thoughts.
  • Reply 10 of 28
    tulkastulkas Posts: 3,757member
  • Reply 12 of 28
    doobdoob Posts: 4member
    I loved iTools. I've just moved all my email over to my mac.com account becasue i can get at it online, through Webmail, and through Mail.app. The cheek of Apple, aswell! They beta test the webmail and then say 'well to use it, you gotta pay!'. great. i was just bidding fairwell to hotmail... sheeit!



    i think the consensus that it should be scalable, with basic email and idisk available to all is the right way to go, though i got a funny feeling thats not gonna happen now that Steve's getting confused whether he is infact Mr Jobs or Mr Gates... Have you seen that horrible leopard-skined-leotard thing called Jaaagwire! christ how tacky is that!!! eugh!



    chris
  • Reply 13 of 28
    majormattmajormatt Posts: 1,077member
    That Jaguar box takes a nice departure from other boxes, it's an eye catcher
  • Reply 14 of 28
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by MajorMatt:

    <strong>That Jaguar box takes a nice departure from other boxes, it's an eye catcher </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Yep, an ugly eye catcher
  • Reply 15 of 28
    Indeed, the .mac concept is not only copying off of the name .net from Microsoft (a stupid move for a company which prides itself on innovation and originality), but .mac IS too expensive, whereas iTools was a really great BONUS to purchasing a mac.



    starfleetX, the service will not end up helping consumers switch to Mac nor will it entice Apple fans to re-invest....



    And by the way, your post is meaningless and derogatory and not appreciated in this space. Thankyou for your cooperation.

    All the luck, Apple.
  • Reply 16 of 28
    [quote]Originally posted by DigitalMonkeyBoy:

    <strong>And by the way, your post is meaningless and derogatory and not appreciated in this space. Thankyou for your cooperation.</strong><hr></blockquote>Meaningless? I indirectly stated my dislike for and disagreement with the current state of that petition. If that wasn't clear, I'm sorry. I'll explain below. As for being appreciated, of course you don't appreciate my comments because they counter what you so obviously want. Nobody *wants* opposition.



    So, you want more feedback from me? Okay, here it is. Rewrite your claim in a mature, grammatically correct, and logically valid fashion. Do some research before you start blasting apple with complaints. Show some proof where you were promised an e-mail account or anything else "free for life." Furthermore, are you so certain about not keeping said e-mail account? Then, what does that link Tulkas posted refer to?



    Why should Apple take seriously a complaint that has such glaring logical fallacies?



    Most importantly, just think before you act.



    That is all.



    [ 07-17-2002: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
  • Reply 17 of 28
    [quote]As for being appreciated, of course you don't appreciate my comments because they counter what you so obviously want. Nobody *wants* opposition.<hr></blockquote>



    I'm not usually in a position to talk for other people, but I was on the phone with him a few minutes ago, and he said he found your comment - not the content of your argument - to be unnecessarily rude. That's why he picked up on it.
  • Reply 18 of 28
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    Did Steve Jobs ever really say that your mac.com address would be free for life? (read this in the petition)



    If he did, it'd be great to dig up a link, or a screenshot of something.



    Now that I think of it, I do remember him saying something like that... hmmm.
  • Reply 19 of 28
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    He actually said something like that? I don't remember.
  • Reply 20 of 28
    tulkastulkas Posts: 3,757member
    There are 75 days left before we will likely find out if we definately can keep free .mac email accounts. I am pretty sure Apple will allow this as a free entry option to .mac. They obviously can't say it right now openly, else those fence sitter that may opt in to the pay option, but have an inate distaste for paying for something that was free, would just stay with basic email. Instead, i think they push the pay option only right now to get those of us who would like everything free but appreciate the value of the full email service, iCal intergation, 100megs storage etc.



    When it comes down to it, I think many people are just upset about paying for a service that was initially free. While SJ *may* have said you could have a .mac addy for life, i don't think he ever said it would be free for live. Welcome to life in an economic slow down...live through a few and you might start to appreciate the real value of services. I think so many people got so used to internet service being free, they have a knee-jerk reaction to paying for these things. It's not like Apple did what so many cable co's like to do, which is charge you more for fewer services.
Sign In or Register to comment.