Foxconn & Sharp to delay takeover talk deadline by 1-2 weeks, report says

Posted:
in General Discussion edited February 2016
Sharp and Apple's main manufacturing partner, Foxconn, have reportedly agreed to extend the deadline for takeover talks by another one to two weeks, following the latter's discovery of undisclosed Sharp liabilities.




Those liabilities amount to about 300 billion yen, or $2.7 billion, Reuters said on Friday, citing anonymous sources. Publicly, Foxconn hasn't mentioned a new deadline, only acknowledging that it will delay signing a deal until it can clarify "new material information."

The company said it received the information on Wednesday morning local time -- a day before a Sharp board meeting -- and complained that the material "had not been previously proposed nor offered during negotiations between the two sides."

Assuming a deal goes through, acquiring Sharp could be a major win for Foxconn in its relationship with Apple. That would allow it to sell displays as well as manufacturing services, and potentially demand better pricing, since Apple often pits suppliers against each other for orders. Nevertheless, Apple might benefit by being able to distance itself from chief rival Samsung, which also produces displays.

There's no sign so far that Foxconn's original competitor for the Sharp bid, Innovation Network Corp., might step back in. Innovation is a fund backed by the Japanese state, and would likely fold Sharp's display unit into Japan Display, yet another Apple supplier.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 4
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,728member
    Ouch!
  • Reply 2 of 4
    2.7 billion is a major number for hidden / undisclosed liabilities.
    cornchippalomine
  • Reply 3 of 4
    flaneurflaneur Posts: 4,526member
    matrix077 said:
    That's the Chinese for you (yes, Taiwanese is also Chinese by race). Never be honest.
    Minor detail: it seems that it was Japanese Sharp that was hiding liabilities from Taiwanese Foxconn.

    But then it's a story from Reuters, and you know how dishonest British journalists are. What are you, by the way? I hope not American, European or Asian . . . 
  • Reply 4 of 4
    kibitzerkibitzer Posts: 1,114member
    realistic said:
    2.7 billion is a major number for hidden / undisclosed liabilities.
    That's why the initial announcements of pending acquisitions always contain the phrase "subject to due diligence." Anytime a company seems eager to be acquired is cause to be extra-inquisitive. Many years ago I was involved in an acquisition that the buyer called off. Reason: The buyer found out that the feds were closing in on the business for committing huge fraud on its government contracts.
    edited February 2016
Sign In or Register to comment.