London Met Police says it has deployed just 641 iPads out of planned 15,000-20,000

Posted:
in iPad
In spite of one-time plans to adopt between 15,000 and 20,000 iPads, London's Metropolitan Police have so far deployed just 641 units, and don't have any immediate plans to deploy more, a report revealed on Tuesday.




The units deployed so far were given to officers in the borough of Fulham and Hammersmith as part of a trial between July 2014 and March 2015, according to a Freedom of Information request by The Inquirer. The police spent some ?6 million ($8.56 million) on the project, including ?1.2 million ($1.71 million) on the iPads and other hardware, and ?4.1 million ($5.85 million) on software development, such as databases for mobile operations. 12 tablets had to be replaced.

A Met spokesperson explained that although all 641 tablets are still in use, and data is still being collected, the trial didn't result in the police force deciding to buy more iPads.

Nevertheless, some of the software and other backend systems used weren't iPad-specific, and could be reused as part of a broader effort to roll out mobile devices to officers. Indeed iPads could still theoretically be deployed to more people, but the Met spokesperson explained that there's no deadline for when it will make a decision on which technology it wants. It is, however, hoping to procure some equipment later this year and judge how officers can take advantage of mobile technology.

Large-scale deployments have helped boost Apple's iPad sales, though they've still been on the decline for the past several quarters. These include sales to schools, hospitals, airlines, and other organizations.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 18
    irnchrizirnchriz Posts: 1,617member
    Typical, spunking away tax payers money.
  • Reply 2 of 18


    I say, Let's give one to the little guy in the front row.. yeah 'im. Let's give one to 'im...
  • Reply 3 of 18
    singularitysingularity Posts: 1,328member
    A much more accurate picture of what they could have looked like using an iPad. Rather than some kitted out riot crew.
    ktappemanfred zornurahara
  • Reply 4 of 18
    bobschlobbobschlob Posts: 1,074member
    irnchriz said:
    Typical, spunking away tax payers money.
    Yeah.
    Right tool for the right job never saves money, does it?
    macguiurahara
  • Reply 5 of 18
    syrransyrran Posts: 42member
    All that is needed is a Jason Statham film in which he uses the iPad during a fight to defend/strike. 
  • Reply 6 of 18
    badmonkbadmonk Posts: 1,293member
    The fact that they are probably not using specific iPad software (Apps) suggest they are doing it wrong...
    phone-ui-guy
  • Reply 7 of 18
    It is sounding lot more like LA School District repeat again. The problem is not the iPad, but the deployment issues. From the article, it appears that they are no using software that is targeting for iPads. Once again, communication problem in Met IT's organization.
    patchythepirate
  • Reply 8 of 18
    saltyzipsaltyzip Posts: 193member
    The cost of developing and maintaining a custom iPad app is probably not sustainable for the government sector. Better to develop a technology agnostic mobile/website.
    djsherlycnocbui
  • Reply 9 of 18
    djsherlydjsherly Posts: 1,031member
    To butcher an old adage, when you have an iPad, everything looks like a problem to solve with it. 

    If they don't have a use case for it or a sustainment strategy, then it's not going to be useful, full stop. 

    Better this way than have 20,000 iPads sitting in stores somewhere. 


    singularitymacguinikon133urahara
  • Reply 10 of 18
    bobschlobbobschlob Posts: 1,074member
    djsherly said:
    To butcher an old adage, when you have an iPad, everything looks like a problem to solve with it. 

    If they don't have a use case for it or a sustainment strategy, then it's not going to be useful, full stop. 

    Better this way than have 20,000 iPads sitting in stores somewhere. 


    Sounds more like you just don't understand iPad's capabilities.
  • Reply 11 of 18
    hentaiboyhentaiboy Posts: 1,252member
    $1.71 million for 161 iPads = $10,621 each. Sweet.
  • Reply 12 of 18
    djsherlydjsherly Posts: 1,031member
    bobschlob said:
    djsherly said:
    To butcher an old adage, when you have an iPad, everything looks like a problem to solve with it. 

    If they don't have a use case for it or a sustainment strategy, then it's not going to be useful, full stop. 

    Better this way than have 20,000 iPads sitting in stores somewhere. 


    Sounds more like you just don't understand iPad's capabilities.
    I'm just about to buy one for myself. Doesn't mean it's suitable for everyone or fits contextually into every scenario. Your statement is the exact expression of what I'm talking about. You're confusing technology with business requirements.
    singularitycnocbuimacguiurahara
  • Reply 13 of 18
    xbitxbit Posts: 390member
    saltyzip said:
    The cost of developing and maintaining a custom iPad app is probably not sustainable for the government sector. Better to develop a technology agnostic mobile/website.

    Sadly, as a mobile developer, I agree. A platform-neutral web app makes a lot more sense for an urban police force where 4G connectivity is ubiquitous. 
  • Reply 14 of 18
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    The entrance exam to join the force probably needs to be upgraded before they have enough bobbies that can use an iPad.
  • Reply 15 of 18
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    hentaiboy said:
    $1.71 million for 161 iPads = $10,621 each. Sweet.
    161?

    Article says 641, so about $2500 per unit deployed, but that includes other hardware.
  • Reply 16 of 18
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    badmonk said:
    The fact that they are probably not using specific iPad software (Apps) suggest they are doing it wrong...
    Would be a pretty bad idea for a back end database to be iPad-specific.

    The article only mentions some software. It's probable that apps were involved.
  • Reply 17 of 18
    cnocbuicnocbui Posts: 3,613member
    The entrance exam to join the force probably needs to be upgraded before they have enough bobbies that can use an iPad.
    You mean like the exam they have in the US where boards pop up and if it's a black person's picture on it, you have to empty your full load of bullets into it in under five seconds?
    singularitycrowleyurahara
  • Reply 18 of 18
    nikon133nikon133 Posts: 2,600member
    djsherly said:
    bobschlob said:
    Sounds more like you just don't understand iPad's capabilities.
    I'm just about to buy one for myself. Doesn't mean it's suitable for everyone or fits contextually into every scenario. Your statement is the exact expression of what I'm talking about. You're confusing technology with business requirements.
    For outdoor, all-weather and potentially hostile situations, I think there is no real way around but going for something like Panasonic ToughPad. This should apply to police, military, fire fighters and ambulance services.

    Efficient and well put together as iPads are, they are still designed for indoors use. Same goes for Surfaces and most other tablets/convertibles out there.
Sign In or Register to comment.