Filemaker 15 launches with support for Apple's Touch ID, 3D Touch

Posted:
in Mac Software edited May 2016
Apple-owned subsidiary Filemaker launched version 15 on Tuesday, making it easier to build customized apps using the latest iOS features without the need for complicated programming knowledge.




With an emphasis on mobility and aimed at improving both security and ease of access, the new Filemaker 15 supports Touch ID on compatible iPhones, as well as pressure-sensitive 3D Touch on the iPhone 6s series.

Apple's latest update to Filemaker also in bridges communication gaps, making it easier to build customized apps for groups of users under 100 people across different platforms. Filemaker's tools are suitable for small businesses to medium-sized companies that do not have a full-scale IT department, but still demand the ability to create custom, packaged apps to be competitive and grow.




New mobility enhancements extend to app extensions, iBeacons and phone browsers. And support for app extensions in FileMaker Go 15 makes it it easy to move files within a project to other apps for editing.

Filemaker 15 also offers greater support for iBeacons, thus allowing users to gather and display proximity-based data within apps they have built. Via Filemaker's WebDirect technology, users can now access web apps on their mobile phone browsers more easily, as the apps are now mobile-responsive, optimizing automatically for screen resolution and size.

Additional features include the ability to fully harness the power of the Filemaker platform on mobile devices such as using custom apps to scan bar codes, capture signatures and add camera photos and videos.




Ease of use has also been improved with a modern user interface, built-in templates and flexible design tools to make it easier to get started instantly. Users can import data via contact management, asset and inventory tools as well as spreadsheets easily to customize and create precise apps. In addition, users can create reports as needed in spreadsheet format with full-color charts.

Filemaker 15 also has security upgrades to conceal sensitive information such as edit boxes, proactive security warnings and greater support for SSL certificates. Security for individual user privileges now extends down to a specific field.

In terms of performance and efficiency, Filemaker 15 now offers in-line progress bars and stat logging to monitor activity and diagnose any speed or performance concerns.

Users can also automate and simplify certain repetitive functions for easier integration such as highlighting errors in scripts, undoing script functionality quickly and embedding SQL, XML sources similar to native databases. Scripting errors appear in red, making it easy to identify and fix quickly.




Designed in mind for smaller teams, Filemaker 15 now offers annual subscription licensing for up to 5 users at $888 per year. This license includes access to the FileMaker Server, Pro, Go and WebDirect software and support services across desktop, web and mobile devices.

There are also options for individual use such as $108/user for Filemaker Pro, $180/user for FileMaker Pro Advanced and $348/user FileMaker Server. You can also purchase one-time perpetual licenses at $329, $549, and $1044 for FileMaker Pro, Advanced and Server respectively.

The App Store offers a free download of the new Filemaker Go 15, which can be used to access solutions created by Filemaker Pro remotely. Filemaker Go requires iOS 9.0 or later and is compatible with iPhone, iPad and the iPod Touch.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    frank777frank777 Posts: 5,839member
    The 'What's New' page only lists four Starter Solutions (Contacts, Content, Inventory, Tasks), while Version 14 had about sixteen. What's with that?
    edited May 2016
  • Reply 2 of 10
    landcruiserlandcruiser Posts: 218member
    I like FileMaker but their pricing is getting out of controller. My customers just won't pay it anymore.
  • Reply 3 of 10
    volcanvolcan Posts: 1,799member
    I like FileMaker but their pricing is getting out of controller. My customers just won't pay it anymore.
    I don't know why anyone other than current users would consider this software solution. It seems really outdated with either Windows ODBC/JDBC drivers or on the Mac with some other third party drivers needed to connect to "real" databases. They claim it's for small companies without an IT department, but you are certainly not doing yourself any favors by locking yourself into a backwards proprietary application with virtually no support from outside IT professionals. Small business owners don't have the time to build their own apps. If you want to be successful, you need to go with mainstream software and tools where help is just a phone call away. I have a friend who is in the same situation with a complex Coldfusion application from the early 2000s. He can't get anyone to work on it now because Coldfusion is obsolete. In my opinion, Filemaker is all but dead as well. What was their other recent disaster? Oh right, Bento. This company is toast, unless they can reinvent themselves with the Apple owned Foundation DB as the underlying data structure, but that would likely break any legacy compatibility.
    edited May 2016
  • Reply 4 of 10
    joekewejoekewe Posts: 29member
    volcan said:
    with virtually no support from outside IT professionals... He can't get anyone to work on it now because Coldfusion is obsolete. In my opinion, Filemaker is all but dead as well.

    Just because you are not personally familiar with the FileMaker ecosystem, does not mean it is dead or obsolete. It has a huge third-party developer community of hobbyists and professional consultants around the world.

    If you are comfortable writing custom code to connect to "real" databases, go for it. The rest of us are perfectly happy running 2-50 person offices with highly-customizable, out-of-the box solutions that work beautifully across Mac, Windows, iOS and http. I think you would be hard pressed to connect your "real" database to custom iOS apps as quickly as we can. A colleague was blown-away when I searched my company's entire customer and sales database going back to 1992 all running locally on my phone!
    edited May 2016
  • Reply 5 of 10
    frank777frank777 Posts: 5,839member
    I had really hoped that with the demise of Bento, a Sales Management template would be available.

    Instead, they seem to have drastically reduced the number of templates.
  • Reply 6 of 10
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    I like FileMaker but their pricing is getting out of controller. My customers just won't pay it anymore.
    I agree the pricing is out of step with Apple Pro applications. which are all very reasonable  I have always felt Apple should suck Claris, sorry FileMaker Inc., back into the fold and make it a genuine Apple Pro app.  Then I remember Aperture :(
  • Reply 7 of 10
    volcanvolcan Posts: 1,799member
    joekewe said:
    volcan said:
    with virtually no support from outside IT professionals... He can't get anyone to work on it now because Coldfusion is obsolete. In my opinion, Filemaker is all but dead as well.

    Just because you are not personally familiar with the FileMaker ecosystem, does not mean it is dead or obsolete. It has a huge third-party developer community of hobbyists and professional consultants around the world.

    If you are comfortable writing custom code to connect to "real" databases, go for it. The rest of us are perfectly happy running 2-50 person offices with highly-customizable, out-of-the box solutions that work beautifully across Mac, Windows, iOS and http. I think you would be hard pressed to connect your "real" database to custom iOS apps as quickly as we can. A colleague was blown-away when I searched my company's entire customer and sales database going back to 1992 all running locally on my phone!
    I gave up on FileMaker around the year 2000. I had the server running but it was just a kludge in my opinion. Since then I've tried almost every database out there on Mac, Windows, Solaris and Linux. For the past ten years it has been LAMP and I see that as the preferred platform going forward. Sure you have understand SQL and programming but it is no more difficult than wading through FileMaker scripting. 

    For decades they have been trying to create applications that allow non-programmers the ability to write software with drag and drop going all the way back to HyperCard but no one has been able to do it successfully so far. That is what FileMaker is trying to do but like everyone else, they hit a brick wall when you want to do anything outside of their predefined templates. Eventually someone will crack the nut and allow people to write software with voice commands but for now nothing beats hand coding.
  • Reply 8 of 10
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    volcan said:
    joekewe said:

    Just because you are not personally familiar with the FileMaker ecosystem, does not mean it is dead or obsolete. It has a huge third-party developer community of hobbyists and professional consultants around the world.

    If you are comfortable writing custom code to connect to "real" databases, go for it. The rest of us are perfectly happy running 2-50 person offices with highly-customizable, out-of-the box solutions that work beautifully across Mac, Windows, iOS and http. I think you would be hard pressed to connect your "real" database to custom iOS apps as quickly as we can. A colleague was blown-away when I searched my company's entire customer and sales database going back to 1992 all running locally on my phone!
    I gave up on FileMaker around the year 2000. I had the server running but it was just a kludge in my opinion. Since then I've tried almost every database out there on Mac, Windows, Solaris and Linux. For the past ten years it has been LAMP and I see that as the preferred platform going forward. Sure you have understand SQL and programming but it is no more difficult than wading through FileMaker scripting. 

    For decades they have been trying to create applications that allow non-programmers the ability to write software with drag and drop going all the way back to HyperCard but no one has been able to do it successfully so far. That is what FileMaker is trying to do but like everyone else, they hit a brick wall when you want to do anything outside of their predefined templates. Eventually someone will crack the nut and allow people to write software with voice commands but for now nothing beats hand coding.
    I remember when there were so many good relational databases back on Apple ][s and later early Macs.  I wonder where they all went?  I just fired up and old Power Mac G3 with OS 9.2 to check out databases from that era I have in boxes.  Double Helix seems the most fun.  Blythe Software's Omnis with drop down menus was pretty fun to use too.  I have never liked FileMaker even though I ran it as a web server for hundreds of web clients back in the day.
    edited May 2016
  • Reply 9 of 10
    volcanvolcan Posts: 1,799member
    digitalclips said:

    I remember when there were so many good relational databases back on Apple ][s and later early Macs.  I wonder where they all went?  I just fired up and old Power Mac G3 with OS 9.2 to check out databases from that era I have in boxes.  Double Helix seems the most fun.  Blythe Software's Omnis with drop down menus was pretty fun to use too.  I have never liked FileMaker even though I ran it as a web server for hundreds of web clients back in the day.
    Did you ever try Butler? That became popular in the 90s used with Tango application server. We used that for awhile on PPC 9500 until we switched to Sybase on Solaris.
    edited May 2016
  • Reply 10 of 10
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    volcan said:
    digitalclips said:

    I remember when there were so many good relational databases back on Apple ][s and later early Macs.  I wonder where they all went?  I just fired up and old Power Mac G3 with OS 9.2 to check out databases from that era I have in boxes.  Double Helix seems the most fun.  Blythe Software's Omnis with drop down menus was pretty fun to use too.  I have never liked FileMaker even though I ran it as a web server for hundreds of web clients back in the day.
    Did you ever try Butler? That became popular in the 90s used with Tango application server. We used that for awhile on PPC 9500 until we switched to Sybase on Solaris.
    No, never came across that.  I just remembered I also used 4D and their web server software which was very good.  Far better than OS X server IMHO. 
Sign In or Register to comment.