Digital Camera

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
I'm looking for a digital camera in the price range of around $200. I know that isn't amazing but we all can't use the sexy ones I get to work with at work (ahhhh...*drueling*) Can anyone suggest some around that price that work with OS X and I can use my 160MB Kodak Card with?
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 24
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    is that the right forum to ask that ?

    NO !

    go to General Discussion



    [ 08-04-2002: Message edited by: Defiant ]</p>
  • Reply 2 of 24
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    It's hardware...i guess i could ask it in general discussion...also i would sugges prozac, u seem to get worked up easily.
  • Reply 3 of 24
    davegeedavegee Posts: 2,765member
    [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:

    <strong>It's hardware...i guess i could ask it in general discussion...also i would sugges prozac, u seem to get worked up easily. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Define 'Future Hardware' okay? Oh and here is a big hint... it's not your OWN personal 'Future Hardware'... <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />



    [ 08-04-2002: Message edited by: DaveGee ]</p>
  • Reply 4 of 24
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:

    <strong>It's hardware...i guess i could ask it in general discussion...also i would sugges prozac, u seem to get worked up easily. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    fvck you



    *get me that bottle*
  • Reply 5 of 24
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,425member
    My fav site.



    <a href="http://www.dcresource.com"; target="_blank">www.dcresource.com</a>



    Jeff Keller review rock!
  • Reply 6 of 24
    macjedaimacjedai Posts: 263member
    Here are a couple of more URLs



    <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com"; target="_blank">Steves-Digicams</a>



    <a href="http://www.dpreview.com"; target="_blank">www.dpreview.com</a>



    They are right though, this isn't Future H/W.
  • Reply 7 of 24
    jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    Moving to General Discussion...
  • Reply 8 of 24
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    Haha no i understand its not future H/W just wasn't thinking i suppose but defiant really does need prozac...along with several other choice drugs... but thankz for the links
  • Reply 9 of 24
    jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:

    <strong>Haha no i understand its not future H/W just wasn't thinking i suppose but defiant really does need prozac...along with several other choice drugs... but thankz for the links</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Please forward all Prozac and other drugs to me for ummm.. scrutiny.



    J :cool:
  • Reply 10 of 24
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    I thought digital cameras were digital hub material...
  • Reply 11 of 24
    jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>I thought digital cameras were digital hub material...</strong><hr></blockquote>



    They are but purchasing advice of any software/hardware is General Discussion.



    J :cool:
  • Reply 12 of 24
    progmacprogmac Posts: 1,850member
    [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:

    <strong>I'm looking for a digital camera in the price range of around $200. I know that isn't amazing but we all can't use the sexy ones I get to work with at work (ahhhh...*drueling*) Can anyone suggest some around that price that work with OS X and I can use my 160MB Kodak Card with?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I have an HP 318xi that I am quite happy with. Look around a little bit, you should be able to find one for $150.
  • Reply 13 of 24
    cubedudecubedude Posts: 1,556member
    I always liked the <a href="http://www.powershot.com"; target="_blank">Powershot</a> series. Here are some links for the S200.



    <a href="http://www.pcvideoonline.com/cameras2.asp?id=255&brandid=1"; target="_blank">Cheapest Price</a>



    <a href="http://www.powershot.com/powershot2/s200/index.html"; target="_blank">What it is</a>
  • Reply 14 of 24
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    [quote]Originally posted by Jamie:

    <strong>



    They are but purchasing advice of any software/hardware is General Discussion.



    J :cool: </strong><hr></blockquote>



    You know, Jamie, this thread should really be in Digital Hub, as Eugene pointed out, or in Genius Bar. General Discussion is certainly not appropriate for camera advice, unless you're trying to change the way things have been done in the past. [Edit: I guess the powers that be changed GD to include purchasing advice. Makes no sense to me, but makes my criticism of Jamie unfounded. Oh well...]



    ast3r3x: At $200, you'll probably have to choose between a fixed lens/2MP camera and one that has an optical zoom but only 1MP. I don't think either compromise is worth your time, unless you will be shooting exclusively for the web use. I would have a close look at the Canon PowerShot A40 with 3x optical zoom and 2MP. At $250 it's slightly above your price range, but I think it's more than worth the additional money.



    Escher



    [ 08-05-2002: Message edited by: Escher ]</p>
  • Reply 15 of 24
    jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    [quote]Originally posted by Escher:

    <strong>



    You know, Jamie, this thread should really be in Digital Hub, as Eugene pointed out, or in Genius Bar. General Discussion is certainly not appropriate for camera advice, unless you're trying to change the way things have been done in the past. [Edit: I guess the powers that be changed GD to include purchasing advice. Makes no sense to me, but makes my criticism of Jamie unfounded. Oh well...]

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I'm just doing what I'm told and that is: "purchasing advice goes in General Discussion".



    Feel free to criticize any time though, you too Eugene.



    [ 08-05-2002: Message edited by: Jamie ]</p>
  • Reply 16 of 24
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Looks like ast3r3x already had a thread about this in here anyway...I just never noticed it because it was in the wrong place.
  • Reply 17 of 24
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    So which is better and has better OS X support?



    HP 318xi?

    A200? (S200 is out of my price range...i'm a cheap bastard)

    A40?



    I can afford all of these and they all have nice features. Which would provide the best features and picture quaity?



    [ 08-05-2002: Message edited by: ast3r3x ]</p>
  • Reply 18 of 24
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Out of those three, I would go with the A40. I would avoid HP cameras and the A200 has no optical zoom.
  • Reply 19 of 24
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>Out of those three, I would go with the A40. I would avoid HP cameras and the A200 has no optical zoom.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I second Eugene's opinion. My A20, which is the precursor of the A40, takes excellent picture right out of the box. The A40 further improves on that by adding movie mode and a few other snazzy features. The A40 is the only realtivey inexpensive camera that isn't crippled in any way.



    Didn't mean to criticize your following Admin directions, Jamie. We simply shouldn't shoot/blame the messenger.



    Escher
  • Reply 20 of 24
    jaskejaske Posts: 73member
    I had an HP (315 I believe). . . it was such a piece of sh!t that I sold it on eBay one week after I purchased it (hence my inability to recall the model #) . . . anyway, every HP I have subsequently checked out was pretty miserable as well: photos tend to have artifacts and other flaws. The Powershot series is pretty nice though, and I'm going to purchase an A40 within the month. Definitely follow the sagacious advice offered thus far . . .





    and "off-topic". . .this moderator-correct, proper-forum stuff is ridiculous. I mean, isn't this a silly little web site with folks posting about computers and like-minded stuff . . . the seriousness with which folks care about repetitious forum threads, appropriate categories, is goofy . . . I mean, I thought Mac users were all thrilled that they weren't up-tight pricks (a la Windows users).



    And by the way, who's the jackass that decided this is General Discussion? Talk about splitting the most ephemeral of hairs . . . and Jamie, this isn't an attack on you, after all, you're only following orders.



    -Jennings
Sign In or Register to comment.