Apple's iTunes Remote updated with two-factor authentication

AppleInsiderAppleInsider
Posted:
in iPhone
Apple on Thursday updated its iTunes Remote app for iPhones and iPads with support for two-factor authentication, reflecting the company's growing use of the security concept.




When connecting to iTunes on a Mac or Windows computer set up for Home Sharing, version 4.3.1 of the iOS app can now prompt people for a four-digit passcode, which is revealed on the computer by clicking a "Remote" option listed in the iTunes device menu, located in the upper-left corner of the software's interface.

iTunes Remote is notably different from Apple TV Remote, which was released in August and branched off Apple TV controls. Instead, iTunes Remote is limited to controlling music, podcasts, and video on a computer sharing the same Wi-Fi connection.

In recent years Apple has introduced two-factor authentication as an option for Apple IDs and various apps, like the official Apple Store app.

The company may be planning to take the idea a step further via future iPhones, which could mix facial recognition and optical fingerprint sensing. This year's "iPhone 8" is at least expected to have an iris scanner and/or 3D facial recognition.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 6
    SnidelySnidely Posts: 6member
    Seems like a bit of overkill to me.
    mike1
  • Reply 2 of 6
    bill1357bill1357 Posts: 31member
    Apple needs to get a grip on reality.  2 Factor is great IF

    IF IF If the customer is informed about what it really is and that the customer MUST have 2 or more trusted devices.

    But Apple doesn't do this; they suggest that you choose it and there is fine print that says something like "learn more",

    but if you say you don't want 2F  (why would you say NO since Apple thinks it is good and doesn't tell the reality of it), on the next page Apple again tries to push the cust into it, still saying nothing important about it.  And this is with a mere upgrade of Sierra using and Apple ID that is already well established and using the old security method, which actually has cust friendly features.\

    If a cust has 2 Factor and forgets the password, account recovery is about a WEEK (can be less, but can be MUCH more).  The cust is left holding a brick for the week or 2.

    I can only imagine the number of customers who say "how did I get that?" or '2 devices? are you kidding....  why didn't someone tell me?'

  • Reply 3 of 6
    bill1357bill1357 Posts: 31member
    to Snidely: it isn't overkill with all of the junk going on on the internet these days.

    It is really great, if only the cust were told what they were getting into.
  • Reply 4 of 6
    sflagelsflagel Posts: 805member
    bill1357 said:
    to Snidely: it isn't overkill with all of the junk going on on the internet these days.

    It is really great, if only the cust were told what they were getting into.
    I don't get it? Why do you make a reference to the Internet, as iTunes Remote specifically only works on a computer set up for Home Sharing on WiFi? Why would someone need 2F to play music? The iTunes Remote does not give access to any truly sensitive information (other than my Library...). I am sure I am missing something and would like to know what it is.
    mike1
  • Reply 5 of 6
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member
    sflagel said:
    bill1357 said:
    to Snidely: it isn't overkill with all of the junk going on on the internet these days.

    It is really great, if only the cust were told what they were getting into.
    I don't get it? Why do you make a reference to the Internet, as iTunes Remote specifically only works on a computer set up for Home Sharing on WiFi? Why would someone need 2F to play music? The iTunes Remote does not give access to any truly sensitive information (other than my Library...). I am sure I am missing something and would like to know what it is.
    Me too. What is the use case for wanting this at home, with my own computer on my wifi network? On the surface, it seems like a waste of time.
  • Reply 6 of 6
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,728member
    Snidely said:
    Seems like a bit of overkill to me.
    It does to anyone who doesn't fall for phishing scams but alas it seems most aspiring actresses and singers with a good body seem to, a lot (cough cough).  So if they do it for publicity (as opposed to just being dumb)  they'd have a hard time claiming they were doubly fooled!  I am sick of tabloids wring how 'Apple was hacked again' every time some semi-famous moron gives their Apple ID and password out to a fake web site be it accidentally or on purpose.
Sign In or Register to comment.