Report backs up claims of slow 3D sensor production for Apple's iPhone X
3D sensor suppliers for the iPhone X are "still struggling" to achieve significant output and improve yield rates, according to a report, which also reiterated expectations that the phone will be in very short supply.
Two executive sources with iPhone suppliers were "unable to offer clarity" on whether Apple will be able to meet demand after the phone's launch, Japan's Nikkei said on Tuesday. One of the people elaborated that daily iPhone X production is currently limited to the tens of thousands -- likely well below what the company will need to satisfy global demand.
The claims echo ones made on Monday by KGI Securites analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who said that the iPhone X's TrueDepth camera would create an obstacle to mass production.
Apple may be having trouble in general, as DigiTimes claimed that the company has asked suppliers to slow down parts shipments to 40 percent of the quantities originally planned. Nevertheless, some suppliers -- possibly the 3D sensor makers -- are allegedly having a hard time meeting even that quota, owing to yield rates.
The iPhone X is believed to be a difficult device to make, owing not just to the TrueDepth camera used for features like Face ID and animoji, but its edge-to-edge OLED display, interrupted by a "notch" for TrueDepth. Samsung is thought to be the product's only display supplier, being the one company with enough OLED capacity.
Preorders for the phone start on Oct. 27 ahead of a Nov. 3 launch. Some analysts, including Kuo, have suggested that mass production might only start in mid- to late October.
Two executive sources with iPhone suppliers were "unable to offer clarity" on whether Apple will be able to meet demand after the phone's launch, Japan's Nikkei said on Tuesday. One of the people elaborated that daily iPhone X production is currently limited to the tens of thousands -- likely well below what the company will need to satisfy global demand.
The claims echo ones made on Monday by KGI Securites analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who said that the iPhone X's TrueDepth camera would create an obstacle to mass production.
Apple may be having trouble in general, as DigiTimes claimed that the company has asked suppliers to slow down parts shipments to 40 percent of the quantities originally planned. Nevertheless, some suppliers -- possibly the 3D sensor makers -- are allegedly having a hard time meeting even that quota, owing to yield rates.
The iPhone X is believed to be a difficult device to make, owing not just to the TrueDepth camera used for features like Face ID and animoji, but its edge-to-edge OLED display, interrupted by a "notch" for TrueDepth. Samsung is thought to be the product's only display supplier, being the one company with enough OLED capacity.
Preorders for the phone start on Oct. 27 ahead of a Nov. 3 launch. Some analysts, including Kuo, have suggested that mass production might only start in mid- to late October.
Comments
Ah, what alternate tech are you recommending they go to. This is tech I believe Apple via some of its acquisition developed which is the reason it works.
Just how many are "tens of thousands"? Is it 30,000, 50,000 or 170,000? I haven't seen any analyst lowering their FQ1/2018 iPhone X estimates in the last several weeks. Current consensus is ~10,000,000.
Ten million equates to ~170,000 units per day. I point this out because 170 thousand is NOT hundreds of thousands (its less than TWO), ergo it must be considered tens of thousands.
Stating that production remains in the tens of thousands is too broad a range to call it a production failure.
This report, like virtually all supply constraint reports, doesn't stand the test of closer scrutiny.
Trading stocks on a quarterly basis must be something the hedge funds do. I'm more interested in YOY sales because that's how most businesses are valued. Letting financial quarters set the value of a company can be quite disastrous. Anything can throw numbers off. Bad weather, natural disaster or terrorist attack could ruin a quarter. I personally think people are being paid to make up fictitious stories surrounding Apple's iPhone sales. Every year they claim Apple is having component supply problems but it doesn't seem to impact iPhone sales to any great degree. People who want iPhones will likely wait until the supply is available.
However, I am ready to believe that China iPhone sales will be weak due to Chinese consumer trends of buying mid-range smartphones instead of iPhones. I think the Chinese are smart to buy what they can easily afford and still get full use of their smartphones. I'm glad if Apple is pushed into relying less on iPhone sales and has to make revenue in another way. The sooner Apple can become less of a one-trick-pony to Wall Street, the better I'll feel as a shareholder. Depending only on iPhone sales makes the company seem too fragile, from my perspective.
Nothing is ever bad for apple, Apple is one of the few company who does not have to worry about perishable demand, meaning that if Apple does not have the product on the shelf user will go elsewhere. Apple users will wait and always have waited to get what they want. In Apple case scarcity is a good things, it make it all that much more desirable.