The three evolutions of Apple aqua

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
How clunky it looked back then! (The website images are early 2000, May 2002, and present)















[ 02-16-2003: Message edited by: MajorMatt ]</p>

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 8
    Looks better now... more simple.
  • Reply 2 of 8
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    Yeah, much better now.
  • Reply 3 of 8
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    it has a cleaner and sharper look
  • Reply 4 of 8
    I miss the shiny blue apple on the first tab...but the grey one is more discreet. <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
  • Reply 5 of 8
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    I prefer the blue one.
  • Reply 6 of 8
    My My Aqua, how you've grown! <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> Actually, the tabs got shorter but, whatever. What we were salavating over 3 years ago, now looks tacky and unrefined.
  • Reply 7 of 8
    Someone really should put up something like a history page of OS X, with screenshots of 10.1, 10.0, the Public Beta, and the Rhapsody DP and DR builds...like the AppleFritter page on A/UX.



    Funny how far Aqua has come. It's not that bad, really...at least it doesn't seem as bad as other people made it out to be when OS X first hit the streets.
  • Reply 8 of 8
    cosmonutcosmonut Posts: 4,872member
    iReview. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> That lasted, what, two months?



    I think the current apple should be a shiny, silvery apple like they have on the front of the displays, or something similar. Otherwise, it is much nicer than it was.
Sign In or Register to comment.