AMD unveils 7nm Radeon Pro VII graphics card for workstations

Posted:
in General Discussion edited May 2020
AMD on Wednesday unveiled the Radeon Pro VII, a high-end graphics card similar to past Mac Pro offerings but aimed at the broader professional workstation market.

The Radeon Pro VII brings AMD's 7nm architecture to a wider audience. Credit: AMD
The Radeon Pro VII brings AMD's 7nm architecture to a wider audience. Credit: AMD


The card is based on AMD's Vega 20 GPU, which was the company's first 7nm graphics processor when it launched in late 2018. It's also the company's first 7nm card in the Pro lineup besides the Pro Vega cards that have been kept exclusive to the Mac Pro thus far.

Designed for intensive media, broadcast, engineering or scientific workloads, the Radeon Pro VII brings AMD's 7nm Pro architecture to a broader market. The Radeon Pro VII offers up to 16GB of HBM2 memory with up to 1TB of memory bandwidth, up to 13.1 TFLOP of performance for single precision calculations, and support for high-bandwidth PCIe 4.0.

AMD says it'll power up to six synchronized 8K and full HDR displays, provide up to 26% better 8K image processing performance in DaVinci Resolve, and up to 5.6 times the performance-per-dollar versus the competition (per benchmarks in its internal testing).

The card also supports AMD's Infinity Fabric Link tech, which can speed up app data throughout with high-speed GPU-to-GPU communications, to the broader workstation market. Notably, that's something already supported by the Mac Pro-exclusive Pro Vega II GPUs.

Credit: AMD
Credit: AMD


Other special features include AMD's remote working technology, which allows users to access their physical workstations from another location using a proprietary enterprise driver.

While not as powerful on paper as the Radeon Pro Vega II GPU, the Radeon Pro VII features a wider range of supported AMD technologies. It's also quite a bit cheaper compared to the Pro Vega II Mac Pro upgrade, and it doesn't require a buyer to purchase that machine to get their hands on it.

To put it another way, the Radeon Pro VII offers the full breadth of AMD's professional power and feature in a workstation-class card. Delivering 6.5 flop double precision calculations, AMD says that the card is up to two times as powerful as the consumer-aimed Radeon VII, which is also based on the Vega 20 architecture.

AMD says it expects the Radeon Pro VII to launch in mid-June with a retail price of $1,899. Workstations with the card baked-in will debut in the second half of 2020. It isn't yet clear if the card will work in the Mac Pro or eGPU setups at launch, but given history, support is likely.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    How does it do at ray tracing compared to a similar NVIDIA GPU?
  • Reply 2 of 9
    mcdavemcdave Posts: 1,927member
    How does it do at ray tracing compared to a similar NVIDIA GPU?
    AMDs RT tech is only for RDNA2 Big Navi, not Vega, so no go.  In all fairness, RT hasn’t quite lived up to expectations with half the frame rate of conventional rendering for limited return depending on the scene. Rainy alleyways may look amazing but most other scenes lack benefit.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 9
    mcdavemcdave Posts: 1,927member
    I’m assuming those are double-precision TFLOPS.
  • Reply 4 of 9
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    mcdave said:
    I’m assuming those are double-precision TFLOPS.
    13.1 single, 6.5 double. Clarified in the article.
    edited May 2020 cgWerkswatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 9
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    AppleInsider said:
    It isn't yet clear if the card will work in the Mac Pro or eGPU setups at launch, but given history, support is likely.
    I sure hope so, though some features would be lost. But, I'd like to see something to replace the discontinued Blackmagic Pro eGPU (whether from Blackmagic or Apple).
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 9
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    cgWerks said:
    AppleInsider said:
    It isn't yet clear if the card will work in the Mac Pro or eGPU setups at launch, but given history, support is likely.
    I sure hope so, though some features would be lost. But, I'd like to see something to replace the discontinued Blackmagic Pro eGPU (whether from Blackmagic or Apple).
    What are you looking for in an eGPU that one of the DIY enclosures doesn't offer, out of curiosity?
  • Reply 7 of 9
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    Mike Wuerthele said:
    What are you looking for in an eGPU that one of the DIY enclosures doesn't offer, out of curiosity?
    The quiet aspect. The space-saving format is a nice bonus, too.
    I can run 100% GPU utilization 24x7x365 and the Blackmagic just idles along at 50-60 degrees.
    It also fits on top of the mini, so my whole system isn't much bigger in terms of desk space than a 2013 Mac Pro.
    edited May 2020
  • Reply 8 of 9
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    cgWerks said:
    Mike Wuerthele said:
    What are you looking for in an eGPU that one of the DIY enclosures doesn't offer, out of curiosity?
    The quiet aspect. The space-saving format is a nice bonus, too.
    I can run 100% GPU utilization 24x7x365 and the Blackmagic just idles along at 50-60 degrees.
    It also fits on top of the mini, so my whole system isn't much bigger in terms of desk space than a 2013 Mac Pro.
    Yeah, unless you go liquid-cooled, the external boxes won't give you that.
  • Reply 9 of 9
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    cgWerks said:
    The quiet aspect. The space-saving format is a nice bonus, too.
    I can run 100% GPU utilization 24x7x365 and the Blackmagic just idles along at 50-60 degrees.
    It also fits on top of the mini, so my whole system isn't much bigger in terms of desk space than a 2013 Mac Pro.
    Yeah, unless you go liquid-cooled, the external boxes won't give you that.
    I sure hope if they don't do it, Apple does, or someone does. (Heck, it is a project I'd be interested in if I could gather the right team of people.)

    The form factor and solid, quiet operation are great, even if it weren't a more guaranteed solution (ie. Apple blessing, support, etc.). I'd give up on a bit of that for those characteristics in a true 3rd party design. I think one a card could go in would get too big, but maybe even that could be pulled off?

    It frankly baffles me a bit that more hardware makers haven't taken cues from the 2013 Mac Pro design, even if they'd never thought of it before that. Work with heat flow and a big, quiet fan. Seems pretty obvious.
Sign In or Register to comment.