California school students are getting 1 million iPads for back-to-school

Posted:
in General Discussion
To support virtual learning programs in the fall, Apple and T-mobile are teaming up to provide up to one million discounted iPads for California's neediest students and families.

Education tools on an iPad. (Source: Apple)
Education tools on an iPad. (Source: Apple)


Alongside its own regular Back to School promotions, Apple is teaming up with T-Mobile to help the California Department of Education (CDE). With most schools expected to stay closed for the start of the new academic year, the aim is to provide computing devices to facilitate distance learning for as many people as possible.

Ultimately, Apple is expected to provide up to one million discounted cellular iPads. It and T-Mobile are starting with 100,000 iPads that will reach schools for the beginning of term.

"As schools are working around the clock to prepare students and families for virtual learning, I want to commend Apple and T-Mobile for stepping up in a monumental way to support California's neediest students," said State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond in a statement.

"As Californians, we have a shared commitment to ensure every student has access to the basic tools needed to connect to their learning, succeed in today's world, and pursue their dreams," he continued. "This commitment provides schools across the state a unique chance to put devices in the hands of students now, while potentially making longer-term investments that can help us remove these inequities once and for all."

As well as providing cellular iPads at an unspecified discount, Apple has also committed its Professional Learning team to provide weekly virtual training sessions for California teachers. The company is also offering one-to-one coaching online, and free access to its Apple Teacher Learning Center.

"At Apple, we believe technology has the power to transform the learning experience for students at all levels," Susan Prescott, Apple's vice president of Markets, Apps, and Services, said in the statement. Prescott has most recently announced Apple's latest update to Logic Pro, but she has also been involved in the company's education and training efforts.

"We are proud the State of California has chosen iPad to facilitate remote learning," she continued, "and during these challenging times we look forward to working with administrators and school districts across the state to help make learning more accessible for their students."

T-Mobile is to provide discounted cell service to schools and students through the program. Details of the discounts from both Apple and T-Mobile are to be shared with school districts, along with instructions for how to apply.
Dogperson
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 23
    gerardgerard Posts: 83member
    It’s ironic the about face that the U.S. public school system has taken  Just a few years back they claimed using iPads was not benefiting students. Now Apple is making a killing selling them to schools. 
    GeorgeBMac
  • Reply 2 of 23
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Here in Southern Illinois a school district has banned the use of private computers, tablets, or smartphones for virtual learning. Parents MUST go to the school and pick up a Chromebook for their kid to use at home. Why remains a mystery.
  • Reply 3 of 23
    Supporting cellular devices for distance learning is probably much easier then home wi-fi (if kids even have home Internet). It is great that companies like Apple, T-Mobile, and Verizon are attempting to make this affordable.
    edited August 2020 DogpersonGeorgeBMac
  • Reply 4 of 23
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    edited August 2020 patchythepirate
  • Reply 5 of 23
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member
    lkrupp said:
    Here in Southern Illinois a school district has banned the use of private computers, tablets, or smartphones for virtual learning. Parents MUST go to the school and pick up a Chromebook for their kid to use at home. Why remains a mystery.

    Likely similar thoughts to using a company-issued device. They probably feel they can better manage the software, upgrades and lock it down from unauthorized uses. This way, the IT departments only have to worry about one type of device to support. Imagine the myriad of laptops, desktops, tablets, phones etc. that would exist among families in even a single school district. Then add multiple Operating systems at various levels of updates. It would be a nightmare.
    canukstormGeorgeBMacmacxpress
  • Reply 6 of 23
    mknelsonmknelson Posts: 1,126member
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    Education pricing isn't about getting a reward from the state. It's about getting kids into the ecosystem; that's where the long term investment comes from.

    Apple almost certainly is still making a profit on the deal.

    And it's good PR.
    Xedtmaymuthuk_vanalingamGeorgeBMac
  • Reply 7 of 23
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    mknelson said:
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    Education pricing isn't about getting a reward from the state. It's about getting kids into the ecosystem; that's where the long term investment comes from.

    Apple almost certainly is still making a profit on the deal.

    And it's good PR.
    Do you live in California? Do you know how things “work” here? It’s an entitlement zone.
  • Reply 8 of 23
    XedXed Posts: 2,568member
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    You just can't help ruining a thread simply because CA was mentioned. Step away from the OANN and try to get some perspective.
    roundaboutnowindieshackGeorgeBMac
  • Reply 9 of 23
    hexclockhexclock Posts: 1,257member
    Xed said:
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    You just can't help ruining a thread simply because CA was mentioned. Step away from the OANN and try to get some perspective.
    If he is a tax payer in the state footing the bill, and raises a point regarding said state, how is that ruining the thread? 
    SpamSandwich
  • Reply 10 of 23
    mike1 said:
    Likely similar thoughts to using a company-issued device. They probably feel they can better manage the software, upgrades and lock it down from unauthorized uses. This way, the IT departments only have to worry about one type of device to support. Imagine the myriad of laptops, desktops, tablets, phones etc. that would exist among families in even a single school district. Then add multiple Operating systems at various levels of updates. It would be a nightmare.
    ^This. We don't support our users personal devices or networks. To do so would be a nightmare. The number of our staff asking us to support them and the variety of setups in a staff of 200 is absolutely astounding.
    GeorgeBMac
  • Reply 11 of 23
    XedXed Posts: 2,568member
    hexclock said:
    Xed said:
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    You just can't help ruining a thread simply because CA was mentioned. Step away from the OANN and try to get some perspective.
    If he is a tax payer in the state footing the bill, and raises a point regarding said state, how is that ruining the thread? 
    Have you read his comments? He's an crotchety old man looking for any reason to attack anything that doesn't support Trump, which includes but not limited to CA, liberals, Democrats.
    roundaboutnowmuthuk_vanalingamindieshackGeorgeBMacDogperson
  • Reply 12 of 23
    iOS_Guy80iOS_Guy80 Posts: 814member
    mknelson said:
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    Education pricing isn't about getting a reward from the state. It's about getting kids into the ecosystem; that's where the long term investment comes from.

    Apple almost certainly is still making a profit on the deal.

    And it's good PR.
    Get the students into the apple ecosystem and you could have a customer forever.
    roundaboutnowDogpersonGeorgeBMac
  • Reply 13 of 23
    XedXed Posts: 2,568member
    iOS_Guy80 said:
    mknelson said:
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    Education pricing isn't about getting a reward from the state. It's about getting kids into the ecosystem; that's where the long term investment comes from.

    Apple almost certainly is still making a profit on the deal.

    And it's good PR.
    Get the students into the apple ecosystem and you could have a customer forever.
    It's a good move, but it's a tough move. Google can (and has) undercut education options with Chromebooks for years. This also affects MS that has a lot of Windows volume at the low end, albeit probably not their biggest profit center as a whole.
    roundaboutnow
  • Reply 14 of 23
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    Good for Apple.

    Hopefully Apple Silicon Macs will have affordable version for education. MAybe some $600 laptops.

    Xed said:
    iOS_Guy80 said:
    mknelson said:
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    Education pricing isn't about getting a reward from the state. It's about getting kids into the ecosystem; that's where the long term investment comes from.

    Apple almost certainly is still making a profit on the deal.

    And it's good PR.
    Get the students into the apple ecosystem and you could have a customer forever.
    It's a good move, but it's a tough move. Google can (and has) undercut education options with Chromebooks for years. This also affects MS that has a lot of Windows volume at the low end, albeit probably not their biggest profit center as a whole.

    Kids still hate Chromebooks.
    Dogperson
  • Reply 15 of 23
    seanismorrisseanismorris Posts: 1,624member
    Apple products have always been ultra premium priced.  But, they learned volume and ecosystem is king with the iPhone and iPad.  About 2-3 years ago Apple started getting a lot more aggressive in pricing laptops, especially targeting the college bound market.

    This move by Apple is a continuation of what they learned.  They want young people to grow up with an Apple product in their hands.  They want them locked into the Apple ecosystem.  They want them trained in programming Apple apps.

    Apple’s vision has really come together.  Providing iPads at a discount is a shore term charge for a long term profit.
    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 16 of 23
    65026502 Posts: 380member
    My son's high school in Palo Alto gave each student a chromebook. Unless the iPad comes with a cover and keyboard, I think I'd rather go with the chromebook.
  • Reply 17 of 23
    flydogflydog Posts: 1,124member
    gerard said:
    It’s ironic the about face that the U.S. public school system has taken  Just a few years back they claimed using iPads was not benefiting students. Now Apple is making a killing selling them to schools. 
    The State of California school system has never claimed iPads don’t benefit students. 
    Dogperson
  • Reply 18 of 23
    Sorry, but I need to disagree with 90% of the comments supporting this - Chromebooks work well in the educational realm and their price point has been a lifesaver. Do these iPads come with a keyboard? Southern cal remote learning in public schools has really been a hitch potch of solutions and I’m not expecting anything better later this month. Adding iPads into this mix likely won’t help - this sounds more like a promotional exercise by Apple and T-Mobile. 
  • Reply 19 of 23
    hexclockhexclock Posts: 1,257member
    Xed said:
    hexclock said:
    Xed said:
    It’s wasted money. California will not reward Apple for taking a hit on pricing. They’ll be targeted with the usual spate of entitled political interests attacking them and will see their taxes going up for the “pleasure” of remaining in the state.

    Point made: https://twitter.com/airtalk/status/1291782365568630785?s=21
    You just can't help ruining a thread simply because CA was mentioned. Step away from the OANN and try to get some perspective.
    If he is a tax payer in the state footing the bill, and raises a point regarding said state, how is that ruining the thread? 
    Have you read his comments? He's an crotchety old man looking for any reason to attack anything that doesn't support Trump, which includes but not limited to CA, liberals, Democrats.
    Seems to me you are the one attacking. 
    SpamSandwichpatchythepirate
  • Reply 20 of 23
    mike1 said:
    Likely similar thoughts to using a company-issued device. They probably feel they can better manage the software, upgrades and lock it down from unauthorized uses. This way, the IT departments only have to worry about one type of device to support. Imagine the myriad of laptops, desktops, tablets, phones etc. that would exist among families in even a single school district. Then add multiple Operating systems at various levels of updates. It would be a nightmare.
    ^This. We don't support our users personal devices or networks. To do so would be a nightmare. The number of our staff asking us to support them and the variety of setups in a staff of 200 is absolutely astounding.
    Reality is that most of us have either Windows / Mac / iOS or Android at home, all the lessons my children have followed where from personal devices all was in the Mix, except Android, it all worked perfectly for the complete school, no IT support needed, we live in different times and frankly we never had an IT department at our school. So for the students that can not afford, between 10 and 20% where I live, I can understand you distribute one platform, that is just being practical. Now, what I do see is these lessons are mostly VC and standard stuff. When iPads are used it’s way way more creative, virtual dissecting of a frog etc, and it really elevates the experience. The Chromebook move is pure cost driven en will create great text and spreadsheet processing robots ...  the education apps is really what sets Apple apart, but reality is most teacher will not adapt (20% will and new Teachers are more into this digital learning experience, though age has nothing to do with it, sometimes I’m amazed that an  ‘ old ‘  teacher is so into innovation and vice versa )
Sign In or Register to comment.