AirPods Pro versus Bose QuietComfort Earbuds: Which are the best true wireless headphones?...

Posted:
in General Discussion edited October 2020
Bose has just released its newest, and most impressive, set of true wireless earbuds -- the Bose QuietComfort Earbuds. We got them in the studio and compared them to Apple's flagship AirPods Pro.

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds versus AirPods Pro
Bose QuietComfort Earbuds versus AirPods Pro


Apple offers up AirPods as well as AirPods Pro, but the latter is within $30 of the Bose QuietComfort Earbuds and also offers active noise cancellation. That's why we chose to compare those two specific models.



Design

There is no getting around it: the Bose QuietComfort Earbuds are significantly larger than AirPods Pro. This is true of the case, as well as the earbuds themselves. Just by looking at them, the Bose may be three times the volume of the AirPods Pro case. This makes a big difference on something intended to be portable that you carry with you all day.

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds case versus AirPods Pro
Bose QuietComfort Earbuds case versus AirPods Pro


Both of them have a flip-open top, but the Bose has a nice feature we sometimes wish AirPods would adopt. There is a physical button that needs to be pushed before the top can come open. We love the fidget factor of the AirPods case, but if you've ever dropped it, you know those individual earbuds go flying. A locking mechanism stops that.

If we look at the earbuds, very few have copied the iconic look of the AirPods (other than grey market knockoffs). Most choose to go their own way, as Bose has. The Bose QuietComfort Earbuds look much more in line with a traditional set of earbuds. They are decently large and have wings that fit into your ear as well as an oval tip that goes into your ear canal.

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds versus AirPods Pro earbuds
Bose QuietComfort Earbuds versus AirPods Pro earbuds


When using them, they are absurdly comfortable. Even though they are larger and heavier than AirPods Pro, because of the wide size and dispersion of weight on your ear, we had no issues with ear fatigue and were comfy for hours on end. They do have a more secure fit compared to AirPods Pro, just because of the wings on the back.

AirPods Pro don't have a bad fit for us, they fit perfectly. But due to their stem and design, they can come free easier than the Bose do.

As for controls, Apple uses the Force Stems on AirPods Pro while Bose uses a tapping gesture. Both are a little fiddly, but we prefer the Force Stems because it is a little easier to do. Bose does have more options though with favorites to be assigned to the left ear and the right ear for playback controls.

Battery and power

Both of these true wireless earbuds have Qi-enabled charging cases, allowing you to power up wirelessly. If you prefer to use a cable, you must use a Lightning cable for AirPods Pro and a USB-C cable for the Bose.

Battery life for these is a mixed bag. Bose wins for single-charge usage, netting six hours. AirPods Pro only get four and a half hours, though that can extend to five if you disable ANC and transparency mode. But AirPods Pro win on total usage time, with an extra 19 hours in the case for 24 hours total. Bose only nets 18 total hours with 12 hours in the case.

Bose QuietComfort battery indicators
Bose QuietComfort battery indicators


This was surprising to us considering how large the Bose case is. With its large size, we wholly anticipated a much longer total time. When you are traveling with your ANC earbuds, you may not get the chance to keep charging, and that total time can be important.

Both have a quick charge feature, with Apple touting an hour of usage time after only five minutes of charging, while Bose states two hours of use after 15 minutes.

Connectivity

Bose is utilizing Bluetooth 5.1 against Apple still using Bluetooth 5 for AirPods Pro, but Apple is using its H1 wireless chip which gives it a massive advantage. The H1 chip uses Class 1 Bluetooth audio, which is more power-intensive and creates a more robust signal than the typical Class 2 audio used in the industry.

Because of that H1 chip, AirPods Pro have a massive 100-foot range whereas Bose is limited to the industry-standard 30 feet.

AirPods Pro in Control Center
AirPods Pro in Control Center


That H1 chip is also what enables AirPods Pro to automatically sync with all of your Apple devices after initial setup with no effort. AirPods Pro show up straight away on your Apple TV, Apple Watch, iPad, and Mac.

Unique features

Before we get to the all-important ANC and audio quality compares, we want to look at unique features for each set of earbuds.

AirPods Pro features

As mentioned, the way AirPods Pro propagate across all your Apple devices is magical. It is easy to pair just by opening it near your iPhone, and they have a very tight integration with Apple's operating systems. ANC and transparency mode can be toggled right from Control Center on your Apple Watch, iPhone, or iPad. Even in macOS Big Sur.

The battery life is displayed too in your Apple Watch Control Center and in the battery widget on your iPhone and iPad. Siri can be helpful too, letting you know where your AirPods are, what their battery life is, and for controlling ANC.

AirPods Pro
Apple AirPods Pro


When setting up AirPods Pro, Apple has a unique fit test that lets you try different tips to determine which seal your ears best. Adaptive EQ uses the inward-facing microphone to adjust the audio EQ so that it sounds its best in your own ears.

With iOS 14, AirPods Pro got new features such as auto-switch that moves you between devices as necessary without you having to pair or unpair and spatial audio which recreates a Dolby Atmos-like 3D audio. It can also be used by developers in their games and apps for a more immersive experience.

Audio Share is another cool feature that allows multiple sets of AirPods Pro to connect to your iPhone, iPad, or Apple TV at once.

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds

Bose is unique for offering 11 levels of noise cancelation. If you go to zero, you will let all the noise from the outside world into your ears whereas 11 blocks out all the outside noise. This is far more granular than AirPods Pro on or off toggle. Because there are 11 levels, Bose allows you to assign your three favorite ANC settings to the left earbud to cycle through.

For example, you can set your favorites to zero, five, and 11, and tap to go between each of those.

Bose QuietComfort case
Bose QuietComfort case


There is also a neat setting that lets you automatically answer a phone call whenever the right earbud is inserted. When a call comes in, you don't even have to touch your phone, just put an earbud in and the call is answered.

Bose Sound app
Bose Sound app


All of this can be controlled from the Bose Music app. It shows the earbuds' volume, ANC level, firmware, and other settings.

Audio Quality

While the size, connectivity, and other unique features are worth considering, what should be the deciding factor is audio quality and ANC abilities.

With that, we can firmly say that Bose wins out. The Bose QuietComfort Earbuds have a much bolder, fuller sound with punchier bass. As Apple already has the Beats brand with a poppy, bass-heavy sound, it set out to design AirPods and AirPods Pro to be more neutral. There is no overly-heavy bass, sound overall is very crisp, and mids are particularly nuanced.

Even then, Bose, which is clear with their larger size, put out a more impressive sound. The soundstage is larger, bass stronger, and overall better.

Calls were good between the two, with AirPods Pro edging the Bose out by just a hair thanks to its multiple beam-forming microphones.

ANC

ANC is the other big deciding factor and once again Bose has the upper hand. As we discussed previously, Bose QuietComfort Earbuds have 11 levels of noise cancellation. This is very nice to tune them to your preference.

While we didn't hop on a flight right now we did limited testing around the studio and outdoors and were left more impressed with the Bose. We had an older Mac rendering a 4K video which had the fans running full blast right next to our head. With the Bose turned up to 11 we couldn't hear the fan at all.

We tested various white noise sounds playing at high volumes through our speakers and AirPods Pro did an excellent job, but let in just a bit more background noise than the Bose did.

Decision time: Which is best?

Based on noise cancellation and audio quality, Bose QuietComfort Earbuds are the unequivocal winners. They sound better and have superior noise cancelation capabilities.

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds and AirPods Pro
Bose QuietComfort Earbuds and AirPods Pro


They also have features like a locking case, a standalone app, and a 25% longer battery life.

At the same time, we acknowledge the AirPods Pro's ineffable qualities that make them adored by everyone who uses them. They work seamlessly and integrate into the Apple ecosystem like no other can.

Where to buy

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds are available for purchase for $279.95 at Amazon.com, along with Bose Authorized Dealer B&H.

Apple AirPods Pro, meanwhile, are discounted heavily, with sale prices starting at $199 at the time of this review.
MplsP

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 18
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,368member
    Thanks for the fair and objective review. I would have been shocked if the Bose didn’t win on the ANC comparison. They know ANC. I guess the true test is to put Andrew on the Singapore Airlines nonstop flight from Newark to Singapore using the AirPods Pro one way and the Bose the other, and see how the poor lad holds up. 
    chasmseanjMplsP
  • Reply 2 of 18
    The comparison I want to see is how they compare (fare) under a motorcycle helmet at 70mph. I get that it's not something the vast majority will care about, but it would be a major deciding factor for me.
    But other than that, good comparison with an interesting result...
  • Reply 3 of 18
    StrangeDaysStrangeDays Posts: 12,879member
    I cannot overstate how much I love the new auto-switching of APs to your active device. While it's what I expected them to do when I got them on day 1, it's finally here and works so well. No other brand is able to do this.
    aderutterchasmseanj
  • Reply 4 of 18
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,368member
    The comparison I want to see is how they compare (fare) under a motorcycle helmet at 70mph. I get that it's not something the vast majority will care about, but it would be a major deciding factor for me.
    But other than that, good comparison with an interesting result...
    That would be a good stress test. I don't ride a motorcycle, which I've learned from friends is a quick way to lose your hearing, helmet or not, but I have sat on a window seat closest to the turboprop engine on a commuter plane several times and I am always amazed by how well the Bose QC20 performs in those situations. I hate the dongle on the QC20 (especially when used with a lightning adapter) but it's ANC is very impressive considering the QC20s are not in-canal headphones. If Apple's or Bose's wireless buds can perform as well as the QC20 wired buds I'll definitely be in shopping mode.
  • Reply 5 of 18
    dewme said:
    The comparison I want to see is how they compare (fare) under a motorcycle helmet at 70mph. I get that it's not something the vast majority will care about, but it would be a major deciding factor for me.
    But other than that, good comparison with an interesting result...
    That would be a good stress test. I don't ride a motorcycle, which I've learned from friends is a quick way to lose your hearing, helmet or not, but I have sat on a window seat closest to the turboprop engine on a commuter plane several times and I am always amazed by how well the Bose QC20 performs in those situations. I hate the dongle on the QC20 (especially when used with a lightning adapter) but it's ANC is very impressive considering the QC20s are not in-canal headphones. If Apple's or Bose's wireless buds can perform as well as the QC20 wired buds I'll definitely be in shopping mode.
    Have both AirPods Pro and Bose QC20i -- the AirPods Pro ANC is noticeably worse than the QC20i. Bose QuietComfort Earbuds is the one you want, assuming 6 hours + 12 hours in case is good enough for you. QC20i with 16 hour battery life is better for intercontinental flights as no recharging is needed.
    dewme
  • Reply 6 of 18
    JapheyJaphey Posts: 1,767member
    I wish there was an AirPods Pro app for the iPhone/iPad. Consolidate all the settings rather than dividing them between Bluetooth and accessibility... adjustable EQ settings...home screen icon shortcuts via haptic touch...widgets...adjustable EQ settings. Did I say that one already?
    hippojcs2305
  • Reply 7 of 18
    Subjective review, not objective at all imho. I guess we all have different requirements and priorities.

    “Neutrality is the holy grail of high-end audio listening. “

    AirPodsPro are more neutral and thus are better from an objective audio quality perspective. 

    I agree Bose are better at ANC, so if that is your biggest priority then go Bose.

    The Apple ecosystem benefits such as auto switching should seal the deal for anyone who is less concerned about ANC and more concerned about music (like me). To be honest the auto switching is so compelling I would even prefer APP if the audio quality was a little lower.

    Of course if you really want the best sound quality neither of these wireless earbuds are as good as proper cans or wired IEM.



    chasmhippojcs2305
  • Reply 8 of 18
    Very good review, but one thing was very nearly left out — the AirPod Pros Spatial Audio is fantastic and yet it was barely mentioned. Do the Bose QuietComfort have such a feature for comparison sake?

    Also, I just discovered the other night I can use my AirPod Pros with my AppleTV. Are Bose QuietComfort compatible with AppleTV?
    chasmhippo
  • Reply 9 of 18
    I just checked out the Bose QuietComfort online. Apparently, when using just one earbud it must be the right one as it controls the other. This is a problem for me as I primarily use my left ear for phone calls, but more importantly perhaps is that one cannot alternate earbuds while charging the other in a case. This is one thing I appreciate about AirPod, and allows me to virtually never hold a phone to my ear anymore.
    chasm
  • Reply 10 of 18
    Thanks for the comprehensive review and comparison. I’m confused by this statement in the conclusion though:

     They also have features like a locking case, a standalone app, and a 25% longer battery life.” — emphasis added.

    This is because earlier in the review you state:

    “ Battery life for these is a mixed bag. Bose wins for single-charge usage, netting six hours. AirPods Pro only get four and a half hours, though that can extend to five if you disable ANC and transparency mode. But AirPods Pro win on total usage time, with an extra 19 hours in the case for 24 hours total. Bose only nets 18 total hours with 12 hours in the case.”

    So, it appears that you’re defining battery life as single-charge usage where the Bose has a 25% advantage — vs total hours where the APPs have a 33% advantage. My personal preference is total hours as both have sufficient single-charge life to support an average flight and greatly exceed my typical earphone session length.

    Question: how much weighting do you give battery life in your conclusions?

    Thanks again for a comprehensive review!

    hippo
  • Reply 11 of 18
    Andrew_OSUAndrew_OSU Posts: 573member, editor
    dewme said:
    Thanks for the fair and objective review. I would have been shocked if the Bose didn’t win on the ANC comparison. They know ANC. I guess the true test is to put Andrew on the Singapore Airlines nonstop flight from Newark to Singapore using the AirPods Pro one way and the Bose the other, and see how the poor lad holds up. 
    Oh...! (pouty face!)
    hippo
  • Reply 12 of 18
    Andrew_OSUAndrew_OSU Posts: 573member, editor

    hereitq said:
    Thanks for the comprehensive review and comparison. I’m confused by this statement in the conclusion though:

    “ They also have features like a locking case, a standalone app, and a 25% longer battery life.” — emphasis added.

    This is because earlier in the review you state:

    “ Battery life for these is a mixed bag. Bose wins for single-charge usage, netting six hours. AirPods Pro only get four and a half hours, though that can extend to five if you disable ANC and transparency mode. But AirPods Pro win on total usage time, with an extra 19 hours in the case for 24 hours total. Bose only nets 18 total hours with 12 hours in the case.”

    So, it appears that you’re defining battery life as single-charge usage where the Bose has a 25% advantage — vs total hours where the APPs have a 33% advantage. My personal preference is total hours as both have sufficient single-charge life to support an average flight and greatly exceed my typical earphone session length.

    Question: how much weighting do you give battery life in your conclusions?

    Thanks again for a comprehensive review!

    Good question! Personally, I weigh single-use as a higher priority. For a few reasons. First, battery life goes down over time as they are used. We see it with all of them. So if you start at 4.5 hours and you start seeing a decrease in that it gets to be too short. Bose, even if it goes down, there is still a good chunk remaining. I already use my AirPods Pro for too long that the battery goes low. I typically have a way to charge these up a bit, especially with fast charging.

    So yes, AirPods Pro have longe overall, but I think the single-use time is too low.
    hippo
  • Reply 13 of 18
    Andrew_OSUAndrew_OSU Posts: 573member, editor

    rainmaker said:
    Very good review, but one thing was very nearly left out — the AirPod Pros Spatial Audio is fantastic and yet it was barely mentioned. Do the Bose QuietComfort have such a feature for comparison sake?

    Also, I just discovered the other night I can use my AirPod Pros with my AppleTV. Are Bose QuietComfort compatible with AppleTV?
    Good question!

    Spatial Audio is very cool but limited at the moment. This works for Dolby Atmos content but will get even better when apps and games implement this too. Bose doesn't have spatial audio, just stereo.

    As for Apple TV, yes! Apple TV can pair with any Bluetooth headphones including the Bose QuietComfort Earbuds.
    hipporainmaker
  • Reply 14 of 18
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,303member
    First, let me say that I’m quite happy to see that (at last) a true competitor on all levels has been compared to the AirPods Pro. While I don’t dispute the conclusions Andrew came to, I will quibble that while he gave reasonably fair weight to the incredible pairing advantage and the better portability of the AP, I feel like he under-weighted some areas.

    First, there is the incredible difference spatial audio can make, which is one of those “magical” features you almost don’t notice till you watch the same movie on cans that don’t have that feature, Also under-weighted IMO was the new auto-pairing as you move to another device, the astounding whole-house (well, my apartment) range, and the importance of the neutral signature for doing things such as editing audio. That said, I reiterate my compliments on both the thoroughness of his comparison and his overall conclusion that Bose is the better choice for ANC versatility and single charge battery life.
    hippo
  • Reply 15 of 18
    jdb8167jdb8167 Posts: 626member
    The case size matters a lot to me. I already carry a moderately large iPhone Pro in one pocket. Having that large Bose case in the other pocket seems awkward. On the other hand the AirPods Pro case fits in the coin pocket in my jeans. They are so compact that there is no reason not to have them with me all the time. It’s kind of like the saying about a camera, the best camera is the one that’s with you.

    I love the spatial audio of the AirPods Pro but until the AppleTV is supported, it is more of a novelty than a must have feature. I just don’t watch that much video on my iPhone or iPad.

    So as long as the AirPods Pro sound good enough, I don’t think the Bose have enough advantages to make me consider switching. It might be different if I spent a lot of time on planes though. 
    edited October 2020 hippo
  • Reply 16 of 18
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,368member
    dewme said:
    Thanks for the fair and objective review. I would have been shocked if the Bose didn’t win on the ANC comparison. They know ANC. I guess the true test is to put Andrew on the Singapore Airlines nonstop flight from Newark to Singapore using the AirPods Pro one way and the Bose the other, and see how the poor lad holds up. 
    Oh...! (pouty face!)
    Just saying ... 18+ hours in the air each way is a torture test for both ANC and battery life. Long haul flights are where ANC really earns its keep in terms of preserving your sanity. Of course AI would have to let you stay in Singapore for enough time to make it worth your while. 
  • Reply 17 of 18
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,095member
    The comparison I want to see is how they compare (fare) under a motorcycle helmet at 70mph. I get that it's not something the vast majority will care about, but it would be a major deciding factor for me.
    But other than that, good comparison with an interesting result...
    I ride a motorcycle everyday and I have zero desire to put anything in my ears that could possibly distract me from what’s going on around me.  I use custom medical-grade earplugs molded to my ear canal.  It blocks out just about everything.  

    I’m not a fan of listening to anything from my phone while driving my bike, especially when one small distraction could very much get me killed.
    GG1MplsP
  • Reply 18 of 18
    MplsPMplsP Posts: 3,929member
    aderutter said:
    Subjective review, not objective at all imho. I guess we all have different requirements and priorities.

    “Neutrality is the holy grail of high-end audio listening. “

    AirPodsPro are more neutral and thus are better from an objective audio quality perspective. 

    I agree Bose are better at ANC, so if that is your biggest priority then go Bose.

    The Apple ecosystem benefits such as auto switching should seal the deal for anyone who is less concerned about ANC and more concerned about music (like me). To be honest the auto switching is so compelling I would even prefer APP if the audio quality was a little lower.

    Of course if you really want the best sound quality neither of these wireless earbuds are as good as proper cans or wired IEM.



    Sound quality is inherently subjective - you are complaining an article reviewing a subjective experience is subjective. Would you have preferred they just printed the frequency response curve? The remainder of the article on features and use was very objective and well written. 
Sign In or Register to comment.