iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: Twice the Thunderbolt bandwidth, twice the price

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited March 19

The FusionDock Max 1 from iVANKY is a new Thunderbolt dock with double the bandwidth of any other currently shipping dock -- but it comes at a price.

The iVanky FusionDock Max 1 front panel
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: Front
AppleInsider

has reviewed so many Thunderbolt docks. We've done more than anybody else, we think.

We've seen the entire range of features, price, storage, and sheer port addition across dozens and dozens of reviews for the last eight years. The iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 is the first one we've seen that uses two Thunderbolt ports from the host device, and we're not sure how much that matters.

The FusionDock Max 1 from iVANKY is a Thunderbolt 4 dock that's aimed at Apple professionals running Apple Silicon. Those two ports from the host, and two Thunderbolt controller chips inside the dock, provide more external monitor support than we've seen in a dock yet.

iVANKY dock standing on end next to a Space Black MacBook Pro
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: The iVANKY dock standing up next to the MacBook Pro



But all this comes at a literal steep cost.

FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock review - Design



Clad in an enclosure with a "floating" appearance, the FusionDock Max 1 looks like an upscale Thunderbolt 4 dock. It's clearly got the most unusual design of the current crop, but even so, it can still be installed lying flat or vertically, and it has copious amounts of ports on the front and rear.

The company says the floating design helps with heat dissipation, but we're skeptical about that. There's no more dock surface area exposed to air versus one with rubberized feet.

Ivanky FusionDock Max 1 on my desk compared to AirPods Pro, iPhone 15 Pro Max, and the Magic Mouse
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: AirPods Pro, Magic Mouse, and iPhone 15 Pro Max for scale



Included in the box is a 0.7m dual USB-C cable, as well as a power cord and a 180W power adapter.

FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock review - Ports and connectivity



There are a total of 20 ports on the dock, covering the typical array of connection types users may want.

At the front are a pair of downstream USB-C ports with 15W of power and supporting up to 40Gbps of bandwidth, as well as two USB-C 10Gbps ports with one having 20W power delivery support, a pair of USB-A 10Gbps connections, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. There are also SD and TFT UHS-II card slots.

Around the back, the connection options are far more extensive. The list starts with a pair of upstream USB-C 40Gbps connections with 100W of power delivery, alongside a pair of downstream USB-C ports with 40Gbps of bandwidth and 15W of power.

iVanky FusionDock Max 1 review
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review



Then there are another three USB-A 10Gbps ports, a 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet connection, an Optical Toslink Audio port, and a 3.5mm Line Out jack. There are also two HDMI 2.0 ports, as well as a Security Slot and a power input port.

This does feel like a decent split between the front-accessible ports and the ones you don't necessarily need to actively access all the time at the rear. The selection itself covers all the major bases, and the addition of optical audio is rare and handy.

All the ports work as you'd expect, and deliver the advertised speed. So far, so good.

The back panel of the iVanky FusionDock Max 1
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: rear



The dock ships with a funky dual-Thunderbolt 4 cable, pre-spaced to fit the gap in Apple Silicon ports. It's a nice inclusion, considering most docks are used with Apple's laptops.

If you must connect the dock to a desktop, that's doable. Two Thunderbolt 4 cables will do fine -- but we don't recommend the dock for this use. Other than the Mac mini, the Mac Studio has enough ports to do what most users need to do, and there's probably no need for this dock in that scenario.

FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock review - Fantastic Mac monitor support



The company's advertising materials have a point -- the main reason for buying this Thunderbolt dock is the external monitor support.

A bunch of cables connected to the Ivanky Thunderbolt dock
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: Lots of cables connected for use



All four of the USB-C 40Gbps ports are capable of servicing a 6K display at 60Hz, with up to four such screens able to be used -- assuming the host hardware supports that. You could also mix and match the two HDMI ports for more connection options while keeping the USB-C ports clear for other applications.

Of course, part of this will depend on the kind of hardware you're actually hooking up to the dock.

For a start, to take advantage of the dock at all, and its dual Thunderbolt 4 chips that handle all the connectivity, you can only use Apple Silicon Macs. It is not compatible with Macs that use Intel chips, nor PCs. At all.

When you do connect a Mac to it, the type of Apple Silicon chip used will also affect what kind of displays are supported.

For the M1, M2, and M3, non-Pro, Max, or Ultra, the dock will only handle a single display up to 6K60Hz.

The dock will deal with two 6K60Hz displays for the Pro versions of each chip. When using the Max or Ultra variants, the dock is able to drive four 6K60Hz screens at the same time.

We tested with a pair of Studio Displays and two other 4K60 monitors from other manufacturers simultaneously, and it works as promised. Alas, it wasn't possible to test with four Pro Displays XDR, as we are not made of money, so we'll take their word for it on this point.

FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock review - Power



As a docking system, the FusionDock Max 1 needs to offer sufficient power to its connected hardware. Equipped with a 180W power adapter, it can provide a lot of energy to peripherals and other devices.

The upstream USB-C connection can deliver up to 96W of power delivery, recharging all of Apple's MacBook Pro lineup. It's not the equivalent to the MagSafe port on Apple Silicon, but we found that it'll get the job done.

Joined USB Type-C connectors for the iVanky FusionDock Max 1
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: Joined USB Type-C connectors



The front 20W USB-C port is the highest-powered one of the remaining connections, with other downstream 40Gbps USB-C ports managing 15W, and other USB-A and USB-C ports providing 7.5W.

That 20W USB-C connection will be handy to recharge an iPhone, especially since it's mounted to the front of the dock. However, the fact that USB-C ports can be powered at 20W, 15W, or 7.5W can be confusing to users looking at the front of the dock, save for the 20W one indicated by the PD label.

FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock review -- just not enough for the money



The iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 is a great dock in a vacuum. We like the connectivity options very much, and the variety of ports do what they say that they'll do, with the power that they promise they'll support.

The biggest problem with this dock is the sheer price of it. That $549 retail price is absolutely brutal. There are generally discounts available on Amazon, but even the $399 that you can buy the dock for with the code provided at the bottom of this review at press time is steep for what you get, considering nearly every other Thunderbolt dock manufacturers are also constantly running sales.

And, it is specifically for the M1 Max through M3 Max MacBook Pro. Other models need not apply for the four-monitor support. It technically works on Mac Studio and Mac Pro, but it's a bring-your-own-cable situation, adding more to the already-steep price.

A large informational sticker on the back of the iVANKY FusionDock Max 1.
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: Instructions on which video ports to use, when



So, this is a conundrum. We love this dock, it looks great, and it performs very well. It's nice to just hang the maximum amount of monitors possible off of it, without worrying about bandwidth at all.

There are just roughly equivalent Thunderbolt dock options for far less money, and in some cases you can buy two of those other options and still have enough left over afterwards sometimes for a small SSD.

We're deeply impressed with the hardware and engineering in the FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock. We're incredibly turned off by the price and specificity to one particular MacBook Pro model.

The box for the iVANKY dock
iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: The FusionDock Max 1 in its box

FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock review - Pros

  • Lots of legacy ports

  • Great power provisions to all of those ports

  • Full port speed under nearly every condition

  • Attractive design

FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock review - Cons

  • Even discounted, just far too expensive

  • Serves no real purpose for any other model than a Max MacBook Pro



All things considered, the FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock gets a Rating: 3 out of 5. We love the hardware in this dock, but that price, the cabling situation for anything other than a MacBook, and the fact that it is explicitly aimed at the Max MacBook Pro models are major issues. If you can get it at $350 or so, and absolutely have to have that quad-monitor support from the dock, it's worth that, and a higher score is in order for that particular scenario.

But otherwise, it's just too expensive for what it delivers.

Where to buy the FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock



The iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock is available from iVANKY directly, with promo code FORINSIDER knocking $150 off, for a final cost of $399.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
    The instruction sticker reminds me of the note card my Dad had on their toilet "Hold down handle 4 seconds to flush."  C'mon, Pops, just fix the damn toilet. 
    edited March 19 hmurchisonpulseimagesdavwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 14
    Falls victim to every other high end dock.

    first, drop the A ports. Adapters are $3. And then, give us more of them.

    $400?  Hah hah hah
  • Reply 3 of 14
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,425member
    Nextgen Thunderbolt 5 Dock features I'd like to see more of. 

    1.  Dual Computer inputs with KVM functionality 
    2.  Dual SSD NVME slots  
    3. 10G Ethernet  
    4. CFExpress Cards 
    5. Less USB-A ports.  I feel like current Dock vendors have engaged in "Port Wars" as a marketing tool. I have no desire to have 18 devices with their wires running into a box. 

    iVANKY is on the right path.  There's nothing wrong with a high end Dock but people that can afford a $500 dock are looking for faster I/O more than more legacy I/O
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 14
    killroykillroy Posts: 276member
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 14
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    killroy said:
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    I guess I'm not sure what else you'd call it, considering it literally uses two Thunderbolt host ports, and two thunderbolt controllers in the dock.
    fastasleepwatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 14
    killroykillroy Posts: 276member
    killroy said:
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    I guess I'm not sure what else you'd call it, considering it literally uses two Thunderbolt host ports, and two thunderbolt controllers in the dock.

    But you would have to use two thunderbolt ports on the Mac. And those ports would have to be independent. The last Mac with independent ports I have seen is a Mac mini Intel. Each CPU on KVM would only be giving you 40 Gb per second.
    edited March 19 davwatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 14
    anomeanome Posts: 1,533member
    So are there any downstream TB ports? Doesn't seem to be, unless you count USB-4, possibly, but that's not clear, either.

    If not, probably better to get a cheaper, single cable TB dock, which has almost as many ports, and doesn't burn two TB outputs to do it.

    [EDIT] Checking the specs again, looks like it probably needs two TB ports to drive all those monitors, but even then, as stated in the article, support for that many is limited. So, I'll stick with a cheaper dock using only one port.
    edited March 19 watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 14
    4 monitor ports? For $550? Seriously?

    I just picked up a $200 CalDigit Thunderbolt 4 Element Dock. It’s nice, except it has 4 USB-A ports and only 3 USB-C/Thunderbolt 4 ports. 
    That dock replaces a CalDigit TS3 Plus Thunderbolt 3 dock. Half the ports were unused.

    I’ve been slowly weaning myself off USB-A buying cables with USB-C on one end and USB-C, Lightning and even micro-USB (headphone DAC and bike computers) on the other end. 
    So, for $9 I just bought a 4-pack of stubby USB-A to USB-C adaptors to stick into the USB-A ports.
     A kludge, but it'll work. They’re purple, too!
    edited March 19 watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 14
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    killroy said:
    killroy said:
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    I guess I'm not sure what else you'd call it, considering it literally uses two Thunderbolt host ports, and two thunderbolt controllers in the dock.

    But you would have to use two thunderbolt ports on the Mac. And those ports would have to be independent. The last Mac with independent ports I have seen is a Mac mini Intel. Each CPU on KVM would only be giving you 40 Gb per second.
    Fundamentally, because of how Apple Silicon handles Thunderbolt I/O, all Thunderbolt ports on Apple Silicon Macs have independent bandwidth, and aren't on a timer. This is probably why the company says this dock only works on Apple Silicon.
    edited March 20 davwatto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 14
    killroykillroy Posts: 276member
    killroy said:
    killroy said:
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    I guess I'm not sure what else you'd call it, considering it literally uses two Thunderbolt host ports, and two thunderbolt controllers in the dock.

    But you would have to use two thunderbolt ports on the Mac. And those ports would have to be independent. The last Mac with independent ports I have seen is a Mac mini Intel. Each CPU on KVM would only be giving you 40 Gb per second.
    Fundamentally, because of how Apple Silicon handles Thunderbolt I/O, all Thunderbolt ports on Apple Silicon Macs have independent bandwidth, and aren't on a timer. This is probably why the company says this dock only works on Apple Silicon.

    So you can get up to 80 Gib if you use both ports. I wonder if anyone did some testing on the real speed you get.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 14
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    killroy said:
    killroy said:
    killroy said:
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    I guess I'm not sure what else you'd call it, considering it literally uses two Thunderbolt host ports, and two thunderbolt controllers in the dock.

    But you would have to use two thunderbolt ports on the Mac. And those ports would have to be independent. The last Mac with independent ports I have seen is a Mac mini Intel. Each CPU on KVM would only be giving you 40 Gb per second.
    Fundamentally, because of how Apple Silicon handles Thunderbolt I/O, all Thunderbolt ports on Apple Silicon Macs have independent bandwidth, and aren't on a timer. This is probably why the company says this dock only works on Apple Silicon.

    So you can get up to 80 Gib if you use both ports. I wonder if anyone did some testing on the real speed you get.
    This is really, really complicated for a lot of reasons. Thunderbolt and USB4 aren't really 40 gigabit in most cases, they're 32 gigabit and (maybe) an additional 8 gigabit -- and even that depends on PCI-E allocation to various ports, and engineering choices made not just by Apple, but by the dock, and attached peripheral vendors too. Then, there's ethernet and USB overhead. There's just too many variables to have a quantitative measure, absolutely, in every scenario.

    All we can really go on, is nearly all of the time, two thunderbolt ports, with two controllers on both ends = double the bandwidth.
    muthuk_vanalingamdavwatto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 14
    emoelleremoeller Posts: 574member
    Normally I find AI reviews spot on but not this time.   For those who have a MBP Max this is a 5 - it ticks all of the boxes for that configuration.   And MAX is right in the name of the product FusionDock MAX 1.  There is no other product on the market that does what this does for that configuration.

    But I agree for other configurations the price is too high.  

    I'm upgrading this year to all M3 Max (and probably an Ultra studio when that gets announced) computers so I already have dock on my purchase list.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 14
    ayooayoo Posts: 13member
    Attention hardware makers.  If it doesn’t have 10gbe in 2024.  I don’t want it. 
    killroywatto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 14
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    emoeller said:
    Normally I find AI reviews spot on but not this time.   For those who have a MBP Max this is a 5 - it ticks all of the boxes for that configuration.   And MAX is right in the name of the product FusionDock MAX 1.  There is no other product on the market that does what this does for that configuration.

    But I agree for other configurations the price is too high.  

    I'm upgrading this year to all M3 Max (and probably an Ultra studio when that gets announced) computers so I already have dock on my purchase list.
    Yup, this is addressed in the review text.

    FTA: "All things considered, the FusionDock Max 1 Thunderbolt Dock gets a Rating: 3 out of 5. We love the hardware in this dock, but that price, the cabling situation for anything other than a MacBook, and the fact that it is explicitly aimed at the Max MacBook Pro models are major issues. If you can get it at $350 or so, and absolutely have to have that quad-monitor support from the dock, it's worth that, and a higher score is in order for that particular scenario."

    I'm going to argue that it's still too expensive at the retail price of $549, though, even for that.
    muthuk_vanalingamdavwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.