A.Q. Khan Admits to Nuke-sharing Activities

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Here's the full text, excerpted from the NYT via the French Press Agency:



Quote:

My dear ladies and gentlemen, Assalam-ul Alaikum, it is with the deepest sense of sorrow, anguish and regret that I have chosen to appear before you in order to atone for some of the anguish and pain that have been suffered with the people of Pakistan on account of the extremely unfortunate events of the last two months.



I am aware of the vital criticality of Pakistan's nuclear program to our national security and the national pride and emotion which it generates in your heart.



I am also conscious that any untoward event, incident or threat to this national security draws the greatest concern in the nation's psyche.



It is in this context that the recent international events and their fall out on Pakistan have traumatized the nation.



I have much to answer for. The recent investigations was ordered with the government of Pakistan consequent to the disturbing disclosures and evidence by some countries to international agencies relating to alleged proliferation activities by certain Pakistanis and foreigners over the last two decades.



The investigations have established that many of the reported activities did occur and these were inevitably initiated at my behest.



In my interviews with the concerned government officials I was confronted with the evidence and findings and I have voluntarily admitted that much of it is true and accurate.



My dear brothers and sisters I have chose to appear before you to offer my deepest regrets and unqualified apologies to a traumatized nation. I am aware of the high esteem, love and affection in which you have held me for my services to national security and I am grateful for all the awards and honor that have been bestowed upon me.



However it pains me to realize in retrospect that my entire lifetime achievements of providing foolproof national security to my nation could have been placed in serious jeopardy on account of my activities which were based in good faith but on errors of judgment related to unauthorized proliferation activities.



I wish to place on record that those of my subordinates who have accepted their role in the affair were acting in good faith like me on my instructions.



I also wish to clarify that there was never ever any kind of authorization for these activities by the government.



I take full responsibility for my actions and seek your pardon.



I give an assurance my dear brothers and sisters such activities will never take place in the future.



I also appeal to all citizens of Pakistan in the supreme national interest to refrain from any further speculations and not to politicize this extremely sensitive issue of national security. May Allah keep Pakistan safe and secure. Pakistan Paindabad! [Long Live Pakistan!].



Comments

  • Reply 1 of 19
    drewpropsdrewprops Posts: 2,321member
    From what I read earlier the Pakistani people are in full support of Khan. If anything happens politically it may be to investigate who it was that was helping him, perhaps further weakening the support for Pakistan's already-embattled Prexy.
  • Reply 2 of 19
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    I'm surprised there aren't a slew of comments here. Anyway, it is interesting to me how Pakistan's official stance went from "There's no way we shared anything" to "We might've shared somethings, but they weren't significant" to "If we shared anything significant, the Government never knew about it", to "Khan did it, but the government never knew about it".



    Total load of BS if you ask me.



    It's like the hypocrisy has come full circle now. We invaded Iraq, but they clearly [don't] have (and never had) any nukes, and the country we're in bed with in the "war against terror" is an Islamic state that now admits its chief nuke scientist not only made a real bomb and tested it (which we all knew ahead of time), but sold the technology to not one but several countries. But of course, we'll do nothing to Pakistan (ever), because we need their help with respect to Afghanistan and Bin-Dickhead.



    [added crucial missing word ]
  • Reply 3 of 19
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    Maybe Musharraf is protecting bin Laden because he knows that as soon as bin Laden is found the axe will fall on him?
  • Reply 4 of 19
    300 million dollars in aid for Pakisthan in Bush's current budget after screwing the local American population of education and stuff. The axis of evil doesn't include friends of the administration even if they fit the definition. \
  • Reply 5 of 19
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    When did Bush screw the population of education?





    Also after 9-11 the world blamed the US for not helping the rest of the world enough. After all it was the "root cause" and all that nonsense. But now all I hear is "'merica first" from enlightened liberals.
  • Reply 6 of 19
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    I'm all for supporting Musharraf (it's clearly necessary), but you have to recognize that he's a dictator that allows nuclear tech to spread (in american supplied C-130s, no less) and whose #2 appears to have likely been directly involved in 9.11 (also reported by the WSJ as verified in part by senior officials).
  • Reply 7 of 19
    Doesn't the latest budget cut funding to education programs? Why is the admin wasting money on pampering Pakisthan instead of being a little stern with them? Isn't that money better spent in the homeland?



    Before you call me a ****ed up, unpatriotic liberal again, "God Bless America".



    [I am not American, though I have spent a few years of my life there]
  • Reply 8 of 19
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by talksense101

    Why is the admin wasting money on pampering Pakisthan instead of being a little stern with them?



    The US is clearly stern while trying to keep Musharraf in power and the government, including Musharraf, under control. I don't know all of the political forces, but my understanding (from the situations in Pakistan I have studied in depth) is that it's a very complicated situation and the current government not only adds a lot of stability, but it is very 'responsive' to US requests/demands.



    But, yeah, there is a whole lot of hypocrisy in the Bush admin's public face. They just hope you don't look at pakistan. Hopefully it won't backfire too much in terms of national security.
  • Reply 9 of 19
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    Musharraf will stay in power and Kahn's / the military's actions ignored, because as bad as this whole thing is, having him in power is a lot more predictable than having some fundamentalist whack-job at the helm. As long as he can be influenced by our government, we'll do nothing to him (and by that I do not mean to imply we should use force, but that we won't even apply any trade sanctions or the like).



    Bigtime hypocrisy.



    As for whether or not he quietly hinders the search for Bin Laden, I wouldn't be surprised. That's his only leverage to be sure. OTOH, if HIS PEOPLE found and turned Bin Laden over to us, there's no way we'd ever lay a hand on Pakistan. We couldn't touch him with a ten foot poll at that point. Cuts both ways....
  • Reply 10 of 19
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Moogs

    As for whether or not he quietly hinders the search for Bin Laden, I wouldn't be surprised. That's his only leverage to be sure. OTOH, if HIS PEOPLE found and turned Bin Laden over to us, there's no way we'd ever lay a hand on Pakistan. We couldn't touch him with a ten foot poll at that point. Cuts both ways....



    my guess is that he doesn't necessarily hinder the search for bin-laden, but he's probably not helping all that much either. but your right, he's better than most of the given alternatives.
  • Reply 11 of 19
    Quote:

    Originally posted by giant

    I'm all for supporting Musharraf (it's clearly necessary), but you have to recognize that he's a dictator that allows nuclear tech to spread



    mush is one of the worst there is.

    responsible for the kargil attack on india

    responsible for the attempted bombing of parliament in delhi

    the s.o.b wouldnt even take his own soldiers back that had

    died in the kargil war

    he needs to be gotten rid of & somone else who can finally

    try to restore democracy in pak should be in place



    disclaimer: i am an indian & ive seen enough suffering

    & bloodshed caused by this weasel to trust anything he says
  • Reply 12 of 19
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    Quote:

    responsible for the attempted bombing of parliament in delhi...



    the s.o.b wouldnt even take his own soldiers back that had

    died in the kargil war...



    Supporting links for these two items in particular? If the first item is true, someone ought to write a few letters to the editors of this nation's biggest papers. That's disturbing to say the least. Would shed a nice light on the situation for all of America, along with this nice little nuclear issue.
  • Reply 13 of 19
    do a google..

    indiatoday needs a sub for their web edition

    it was covered by quite a few papers indian & bbc

    i was already living here in san diego at this time

    & followed the news via the web & by calling my parents

    to make sure they were ok



    this happened quite a few years ago.

    general mush was the architect of the kargil war

    where the pak army unleashed an assault near the international

    border.short story..they got their asses kicked

    the pak pow's were released to their govt who disclaimed

    all responsibilty......his own soldiers & he wont take them back..



    the bomb incident happend shortly after the indian pm

    made a peace initiative

    the link to that is

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/wo...00/1709717.stm



    mush & his fellow cronies have a pathological hatred of india...which is ironic because 2 of my closest friends here

    are from pakistan & are the nicest, kindest people you could

    ever know.



    bottom line..the military in pak has always been obsessed

    with defeating/destroying india at any cost & trying to

    annexe kashmir..never mind the fact that india is much like

    the u.s, multicultural & multi religious democracy & the people there have no mad desire to run over to pakistan



    im just sorry that the people in pak have to suffer

    under a war mongering nutjob



    peace
  • Reply 14 of 19
    another thing to google on...

    in 86 or thereabouts bombay was hit by 13 bombs

    including at the stock exchange & a lot of people were killed.

    i was there & there were a lot of dead kids...they had

    blown up a school bus



    the guys who did this were from pak & trained by their

    isi/military...

    cut short a few years later & the same clowns did a job

    on the world trade center in ny..this was way before 911



    so no ..i dont have a desire to see my tax dollars

    go to arming/supporting a country that turns around

    & screws us & then exports nukes all over the planet.



    yeah we can write to the media here & it wont make any difference.the indian media has been shouting itself hoarse

    for years & was ignored by our media here...& now the chickens

    are coming home to roost.
  • Reply 15 of 19
    chu_bakkachu_bakka Posts: 1,793member
    AND Musharaf pardoned him today...



    off the hook...



    NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION.



    A friend in the war on terrorism indeed.



    They did EXACTLY what the Bush administration went to war in Iraq to supposedly prevent... and we do nothing.



    Nice.



    And pakistan won't let american troops on their soil to hunt for Osama.
  • Reply 16 of 19
    Quote:

    Originally posted by chu_bakka

    AND Musharaf pardoned him today...



    off the hook...



    NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION.



    A friend in the war on terrorism indeed.



    They did EXACTLY what the Bush administration went to war in Iraq to supposedly prevent... and we do nothing.



    Nice.



    And pakistan won't let american troops on their soil to hunt for Osama.




    not much we can do about it. we need what little help we can get from these guys. for now they are somewhat cooperative as a government, even if most of their country hates us. the really scary thing is that one of these days the "bad guys" are not only going to get their hands on a nuke, but they'll also try to use it. the day that happens is the day we will turn that whole region into one big parking lot. i see no other way around it unfortunately.
  • Reply 17 of 19
    Quote:

    Originally posted by running with scissors

    the really scary thing is that one of these days the "bad guys" are not only going to get their hands on a nuke, but they'll also try to use it. the day that happens is the day we will turn that whole region into one big parking lot.



    You wouldn't be a foreign policy advisor to President Bush, would you? That statement is something I would expect GWB to use.



    You allow poliferation. You don't exercise control on rogue nations for your own political needs. You do what is necessary to meet your ends. When things get out of hand, you switch sides and carpet bomb the place... sheesh!
  • Reply 18 of 19
    Quote:

    Originally posted by talksense101

    You wouldn't be a foreign policy advisor to President Bush, would you? That statement is something I would expect GWB to use.



    You allow poliferation. You don't exercise control on rogue nations for your own political needs. You do what is necessary to meet your ends. When things get out of hand, you switch sides and carpet bomb the place... sheesh!




    actual no, i can't stand the guy. i blame most of the current mess squarely on the shoulders of his administration. i certainly don't wish the use of force over diplomatic means. however, the fact is we are where we are, and no matter how hard we try diplomaticaly to stop groups like bin Laden's from getting a hold of nukes, they will get them and use them one day. and if governments of the region are unwilling to make the effort to put an end to that kind of threat, then they will be held accountable. if you think we as a nation were out for blood following 9-11, imagine what will happen if a nuke goes off targeting americans. do you honestly think most americans are going to give a rat's ass if their goverment decides to lay waste to whole countries in order try and protect them from further attacks? i doubt it. i'm not saying it's right, far from it. i'm just affraid that is where this could be heading some day.
  • Reply 19 of 19
    shawnjshawnj Posts: 6,656member
    nuke-sharing-related-program-activities?
Sign In or Register to comment.