600 G5's clean up Star Wars Trilogy

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    johnqjohnq Posts: 2,763member
    You left out the hard disk requirements: 0.3691406 petabytes



    And knowing he was involved in the moon landing videos only makes me happier with my sig of late.
  • Reply 2 of 9
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Nothing new. They did the same thing with the Indy trilogy.
  • Reply 3 of 9
    idunnoidunno Posts: 645member
    Yes, but by "clean up", do you mean "they have removed all the crap from the Special Editions"?



    iDunno
  • Reply 4 of 9
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    What a waste, when these CPUs could have been better spent bringing Sean Connerys Bond movies into this century,



    Well at least Lucas didnt put JarJar in the originals via the G5s.



    STAR WARS SUCKS
  • Reply 5 of 9
    brussellbrussell Posts: 9,812member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by mello

    600 G5's clean up Star Wars Trilogy



    You mean they wrote new dialogue?
  • Reply 6 of 9
    They removed the dirt from the original film using properitary algorithms and converted the media to digital format. The algorithm is so good that the director of the movie has to tell the company how much of dirt to leave behind after cleaning. Movies that are too clean (no dust, scratch) appear artificial.
  • Reply 7 of 9
    * goes to perfect JarJarVirus for selective delete *
  • Reply 8 of 9
    Quote:

    Originally posted by curiousuburb

    * goes to perfect JarJarVirus for selective delete *



    Wrong Trilogy... but yeah, I'm all for the Jar Jar virus.
  • Reply 9 of 9
    johnqjohnq Posts: 2,763member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Akumulator

    Wrong Trilogy... but yeah, I'm all for the Jar Jar virus.





    That should be the "Jar Jar AntiVirus" which combats the dreaded Jar Jar Virus (which causes massive Denial Of Enjoyment attacks every 3 years).
Sign In or Register to comment.