"staff" group questions
1) I have noticed that some of my user's home folders have this ownership (example):
drwxrwxrwt 8 joe staff 272 11 Oct 13:44 joe
Any idea why user's home folder would have group ownership of "staff"? The users in question are not admins.
2) On a healthy system, shouldn't "staff (20)" contain only root and admin?
3) On my OS X Macs, why does the "id" command show a bunch of people in "staff (20)", but NetInfo sees only root as a "staff (20)" member? I have a conflict in terms of what "id" and NetInfo see.
4) Is there anything secret or special about staff?
drwxrwxrwt 8 joe staff 272 11 Oct 13:44 joe
Any idea why user's home folder would have group ownership of "staff"? The users in question are not admins.
2) On a healthy system, shouldn't "staff (20)" contain only root and admin?
3) On my OS X Macs, why does the "id" command show a bunch of people in "staff (20)", but NetInfo sees only root as a "staff (20)" member? I have a conflict in terms of what "id" and NetInfo see.
4) Is there anything secret or special about staff?
Comments
2. Staff only contains root. You manually have to add users to staff.
3. id returns the groups for that process. It doesn't list users in the group. It only matters what netinfo tells you.
4. On some other unix platforms staff as a different gid, 10 in solaris, i think 1 in AIX and 20 in HPUX (not sure).
Some linuxes don't have a staff group.
Dobby.
I got this info from an Apple SE:
Netinfo will not report them as members because they do not exist in the netinfo domain, they exist in AD.
Since all users must exist in at-least one unix group, AD users are mapped to staff group by default.