"Mactel" not sexy enough... suggestions?

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
In reading some of the posts about the new arrangement, "Mactel" doesn't seem to cut the mustard-- it's bit clunky. I find "Appletel" a bit better, but it's forced, too.



Since Wintel is a mix of "Windows" and "Intel," I propose Xtel for "OS X" and "Intel"-- or at least beg for something that sounds a bit better than if McDonalds merged with BellSouth or something...



As my first forum offering, I felt is was important enough to post, so here it is. The last thing I want is for some terrible label to take hold before we've had our say about it.



Thinking caps everyone...
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 28
    onyx-pbonyx-pb Posts: 26member
    Finally... some trivia after all the upsets:



    I liked your XTel (After all the soul of a mac is the operating system)



    I've seen APPTEL mentioned a few times (a bit less clunky that APPLETEL)



    MacIntel?



    MIntel (nah, sounds like a breath freshener)
  • Reply 2 of 28
    macchinemacchine Posts: 295member
    Maci is where its at, Thin Dif, Cowboy !!!





    PC becomes MC ???
  • Reply 3 of 28
    midwintermidwinter Posts: 10,060member
    Intellintosh.
  • Reply 4 of 28
    e1618978e1618978 Posts: 6,075member
    Pentiumac

    Pentimac

    Pentamac

    UltraPower Mac

    Mac Power Plus

    UltraMac

    Infinimac

    Macalicious

    Macnificent

    Abstract Mac (abstracts the Processor)

    Xcomp (computer that runs OS X)

    HAL

    Hypercube (req. buy trademark)

    HyperMac

    HypnoMac

    intelMac

    Macteligent
  • Reply 5 of 28
    ricksbrainricksbrain Posts: 517member
    After thinking it over-- how's about Macinstosh?



    If Intel's a given, there's no sense in differentiating.
  • Reply 6 of 28
    fahlmanfahlman Posts: 740member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by midwinter

    Intellintosh.



    The best I've seen yet.
  • Reply 7 of 28
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    We don't call the Powermac G5 the Powermac 970.



    I don't see why the names will change with the move to Intel.
  • Reply 8 of 28
    cosmonutcosmonut Posts: 4,872member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ricksbrain

    Since Wintel is a mix of "Windows" and "Intel," I propose Xtel for "OS X" and "Intel"



    The operating system Apple uses is officially "Mac OS X." Therefore, to use the beginning three letters of the OS' name, as "Wintel" uses, the proper name to use *should* be "Mactel."



    However, we Mac users are more sophisticated than that. I happen to like the coincidence that both Macintosh and Intel use "int" in their names. Hence, my suggestion is "Macintel," as others have used around here too.
  • Reply 9 of 28
    macchinemacchine Posts: 295member
    How about...











    MacinHel
  • Reply 10 of 28
    macchinemacchine Posts: 295member
    I got it, I figured it out...





    [COLOR=sea-green]Mac/[/COLOR]



    Mac OS X/









    ( Macslash as in Win/tel, since these Macs do windops ! )
  • Reply 11 of 28
    zozo Posts: 3,117member
    despite everything, I think Mactel will be the one that sticks (journalists, blogs, etc... )
  • Reply 12 of 28
    vox barbaravox barbara Posts: 2,021member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ZO

    despite everything, I think Mactel will be the one that sticks (journalists, blogs, etc... )



    Everything -tel and -in sounds

    el cheapo. From a marketing pov i'd

    suggest you guys to avoid these -fixes.
  • Reply 13 of 28
    sunilramansunilraman Posts: 8,133member
    presenting....

    the



    Apple g6 sextium







    dude and dudettes, everything locks in perfectly

    2006...

    6-june-2006

    6-6-6

    devil, sin

    sex

    sexy - number 6

    penta = 5 = pentium

    next generation pentium = 5+1 = 6

    sexta = 6

    sextium.

    6 ; g5 + 1 = g6



    all hail 2006 and the year of Apple?s g6 sextium

    fucking sweet



    ooh... fucking

    sex

    sextium....

    sleek

    sexy

    svelte

    suavé

    6... 9... 69, get it...

    999

    666

    etc



    edit:

    while my mind is still in the gutter... (well, we are talking marketing here)



    Phil on the Sextium (he could rename himself the "dr. feelgood phil" of the computing world

    "this time apple both delivers on the outside in terms of looks and sexiness with a raging power under the sheets... um i mean hood... with our partners Intel, the Apple g6 sextium both looks good and performs well everyday and all day... wish i could say that about my wif---- oh, where was i... yeah, sexiness, power, inside and outside."







    ................

    what a great way to launch the 'mactel' (yes, mactel sounds crap)

  • Reply 14 of 28
    midwintermidwinter Posts: 10,060member
    I think you want a G6 Getitonium.
  • Reply 15 of 28
    sunilramansunilraman Posts: 8,133member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by midwinter

    I think you want a G6 Getitonium.



  • Reply 16 of 28
    ricksbrainricksbrain Posts: 517member
    Is there any reason to really include the Intel part? If processors are the same for everybody, Intel basically is a given...



    I vote just plain ol' Macintosh again. At least after the transition's over, there won't be as much need to stipulate which chip...
  • Reply 17 of 28
    bentonbenton Posts: 161member
    We have no need to reference any parts supplier in our favored



    computing platform. Maybe IBM will stay longer at the high end



    if it can impliment it's road map. Time will tell.



    MACINTOSH today, MACINTOSH tomorrow and MACINTOSH forefvaa!
  • Reply 18 of 28
    cosmonutcosmonut Posts: 4,872member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Benton

    We have no need to reference any parts supplier in our favored



    computing platform. Maybe IBM will stay longer at the high end



    if it can impliment it's road map. Time will tell.



    MACINTOSH today, MACINTOSH tomorrow and MACINTOSH forefvaa!




    Why do you use a hard return and then put an extra space



    between each of the lines you type here? The box and server



    will automatically wrap the text for you so that there is no longer a need for you to hit return or add an extra line, yo.



  • Reply 19 of 28
    danmacmandanmacman Posts: 773member
    XBOX...oh wait...nevermind.
  • Reply 20 of 28
    macchinemacchine Posts: 295member
    No its definitely...



    NO QUESTION ABOUT IT...









    [COLOR=sea-green]Mac/[/COLOR]



    AND



    Mac OS X/







Sign In or Register to comment.