iMac G5 heat issues: overemphasized, or a real problem?

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited January 2014
After reading about this cooling mod to the iMac G5, I'm concerned.



I just recently decided to purchase the iMac 17" with the SuperDrive, but now I'm wondering that, in my room which tends to be one of the warmest ones in the house, purchasing this might not be such a great idea.



Does the iMac 17" have serious cooling issues? What about the 20"? Is the larger enclosure better for handling those issues? Or is this entire complaint about running too hot and shortening the life of the innards overblown?



For those of you who own new iMacs, your input would be most helpful.



GTSC
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 24
    proxyproxy Posts: 232member
    I've a 17" 2Ghz iMac and had zero problems with heat even when leaving folding@home running on full processor for hours on end at 30ºC+. This mod just makes me weep to look at it
  • Reply 2 of 24
    I had problems with my 20" 1.8 ... ended up having the logic board replaced.



    It was definitely a heat problem, (overheating caused a capacitor to burst ... others appeared affected also)..



    I'm not convinced it was the Mac's fault though... it could easily have been inferior capacitors that just couldn't stand the heat they were supposed to. If that is the case, Apple likely fixed it, and newer machines will probably NOT be affected ... better quality capacitors are probably being used now.



    None of this is anything other than educated speculation ... but it sure sounds reasonable to me.



    So... I'd figure buying a new machine should be OK ...
  • Reply 3 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by KingOfSomewhereHot

    I had problems with my 20" 1.8 ... ended up having the logic board replaced.



    It was definitely a heat problem, (overheating caused a capacitor to burst ... others appeared affected also)..



    I'm not convinced it was the Mac's fault though... it could easily have been inferior capacitors that just couldn't stand the heat they were supposed to. If that is the case, Apple likely fixed it, and newer machines will probably NOT be affected ... better quality capacitors are probably being used now.



    None of this is anything other than educated speculation ... but it sure sounds reasonable to me.



    So... I'd figure buying a new machine should be OK ...




    Was it a Rev A or a Rev B?
  • Reply 4 of 24
    londorlondor Posts: 258member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by john.outwater

    Was it a Rev A or a Rev B?



    20" 1.8 = Rev A
  • Reply 5 of 24
    piotpiot Posts: 1,346member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by KingOfSomewhereHot





    It was definitely a heat problem, (overheating caused a capacitor to burst ... others appeared affected also)..







    Not sure if that is strictly true. There seems to have been a rather large amount of rogue non spec capacitors on the market for a while. Affected other companies as well ( Dell for one!). Try google for more info.
  • Reply 6 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by piot

    Not sure if that is strictly true. There seems to have been a rather large amount of rogue non spec capacitors on the market for a while. Affected other companies as well ( Dell for one!). Try google for more info.



    It's still a heat issue .... heat causes the capacitors to expand/buldge/burst...



    My point was that the "heat problem" might NOT have been Apple's fault, but rather, the fault of the capacitor supplier.
  • Reply 7 of 24
    auroraaurora Posts: 1,142member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by KingOfSomewhereHot

    It's still a heat issue .... heat causes the capacitors to expand/buldge/burst...



    My point was that the "heat problem" might NOT have been Apple's fault, but rather, the fault of the capacitor supplier.




    Made in China, need we say more? Rev A had lots and lots of issues. B looks better but what were they thinking by putting the power supply in there???G5 iMacs have had some bad history in the reliability field.
  • Reply 8 of 24
    iposteriposter Posts: 1,560member
    I've been holding off on upgrading from an iMac G4 precisely because I was worried about possible heat issues from the first time I saw a photo of the interior of the G5 iMac.



    Just putting the power supply in a brick wouldn't have made much difference in appearance, since you can easily hide the brick (Mac Mini/Cube anyone?) and would have removed much of the heat source. If they insisted on putting it in there, why not put the power supply on the top instead of the bottom? All it's doing down there is pre-heating the air before it gets to the G5/GPU/RAM and drives.



    Not to mention the separate issue that HDD and DVD/CD-ROM drives are, IIRC, designed to run in a flat orientation, not vertically placed. I think it will be interesting to look back in a few years and compare the life-span of the iMac G5 HDD and ROM drives to the PM or eMac drives.
  • Reply 9 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by iPoster

    I've been holding off on upgrading from an iMac G4 precisely because I was worried about possible heat issues from the first time I saw a photo of the interior of the G5 iMac.



    Just putting the power supply in a brick wouldn't have made much difference in appearance, since you can easily hide the brick (Mac Mini/Cube anyone?) and would have removed much of the heat source. If they insisted on putting it in there, why not put the power supply on the top instead of the bottom? All it's doing down there is pre-heating the air before it gets to the G5/GPU/RAM and drives.



    Not to mention the separate issue that HDD and DVD/CD-ROM drives are, IIRC, designed to run in a flat orientation, not vertically placed. I think it will be interesting to look back in a few years and compare the life-span of the iMac G5 HDD and ROM drives to the PM or eMac drives.




    Wow, this is not the sort of thread someone like me, who is wanting to buy a new iMac in the next month, should be reading. I don't want to wait any longer and I have to assume the number of problemed iMacs while large is still minor compared to those that work fine.
  • Reply 10 of 24
    c2poonc2poon Posts: 38member
    I have had an iMac 20" rev. B since May. This is my first Mac, and it's great! Really sexy stuff, and great for showing off... hehe. I wouldn't hesitate to buy this puppy again.



    The room does need to be ventilated in the summer months, cause my Mac does emit quite some heat. The amount of heat is manageable for me. I have options to cool the place down, and putting it to sleep mode really helps too.
  • Reply 11 of 24
    pbg4 dudepbg4 dude Posts: 1,611member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by KingOfSomewhereHot

    I had problems with my 20" 1.8 ... ended up having the logic board replaced.



    It was definitely a heat problem, (overheating caused a capacitor to burst ... others appeared affected also)..



    I'm not convinced it was the Mac's fault though... it could easily have been inferior capacitors that just couldn't stand the heat they were supposed to. If that is the case, Apple likely fixed it, and newer machines will probably NOT be affected ... better quality capacitors are probably being used now.



    None of this is anything other than educated speculation ... but it sure sounds reasonable to me.



    So... I'd figure buying a new machine should be OK ...




    I'm bringing my Rev. A iMac G5 20" into the Apple store for service at the end of the week. My CPU temps reach 90C after 20 minutes! It's almost to the boiling point of water! My computer will either put itself to sleep of give me the SWOD. It totally sucks.
  • Reply 12 of 24
    Thanks to everyone so far for your responses. However, I see that most of these problems are in the Rev A version.



    For those of you who own Rev B machines, specifically the 17", what is your experience?



    And... I'm guessing that AppleCare on these new machines might not be a bad investment?



    GTSC
  • Reply 13 of 24
    pbg4 dudepbg4 dude Posts: 1,611member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Gandalf the Semi-Coherent

    Thanks to everyone so far for your responses. However, I see that most of these problems are in the Rev A version.



    For those of you who own Rev B machines, specifically the 17", what is your experience?



    And... I'm guessing that AppleCare on these new machines might not be a bad investment?



    GTSC




    I hadn't completely decided on AppleCare until this issue came up on my iMac. Luckily Apple gives you the first year of ownership to decide whether or not to get AppleCare. With the CPU temps. I've been clocking I have no choice but to get AppleCare. If Apple doesn't replace the logic board, the CPU will most definitely not last too much longer since it's been running so far out of spec.
  • Reply 14 of 24
    I didn't buy Apple Care .... If I had no problems during the first year, I'd leave it that way ... But since I've had problems, I'll now invest the $$ to extend warranty another 2 years.



    I figure if nothing breaks in the first several months, odds are it's gonna last several more years just fine. But If you have problems when it's new, there's a good chance you'll continue to have problems... I think having a year to decide whether or not to purchase AppleCare is good deal!
  • Reply 15 of 24
    That's what I'd recommend as well. If everything is 100% fine during the first year, don't go for AppleCare. However, if you're having problems, it's worth it.
  • Reply 16 of 24
    pinopino Posts: 8member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Gandalf the Semi-Coherent

    After reading about this cooling mod to the iMac G5, I'm concerned.



    I just recently decided to purchase the iMac 17" with the SuperDrive, but now I'm wondering that, in my room which tends to be one of the warmest ones in the house, purchasing this might not be such a great idea.



    Does the iMac 17" have serious cooling issues? What about the 20"? Is the larger enclosure better for handling those issues? Or is this entire complaint about running too hot and shortening the life of the innards overblown?



    For those of you who own new iMacs, your input would be most helpful.



    GTSC




    I have the newer version, and have had no problems up to 78F degrees ambient.

    The highest I've seen in temperature (according to the widget) is 177F (momentarily). Normally it runs in the 160F-165F range.

    I have no idea if this is bad or good.

    What are the ideal/maximum temps that will result in failure?
  • Reply 17 of 24
    What is different between the design of the PowerMacs vs iMacs? Whatever it is it must be substantial when it comes to heat. How did Apple stuff everything into an iMac and expect not to have heat problems?
  • Reply 18 of 24
    iposteriposter Posts: 1,560member
    For comparison purposes, my iMac G4 runs at 109F at the HD (the only detectable temp sensor) which I consider to be the equivalent case temp and my Athlon64 3400+ runs at 127F on the CPU. Both computers are running Folding @ Home 24/7 by the way....



    I don't know about the G5 pino, but AMD recommends 160F as a safe maximum for the Athlon.



  • Reply 19 of 24
    gene cleangene clean Posts: 3,481member
    According to this, the temperature widget is a hoax. You might want to use something else pino.
  • Reply 20 of 24
    pinopino Posts: 8member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Gene Clean

    According to this, the temperature widget is a hoax. You might want to use something else pino.





    Thanks for the link!

    Somewhat disappointing to find out, but sometimes the truth hurts!
Sign In or Register to comment.