Another iMac or Mac Pro decision - Switcher!

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited January 2014
Hey all -



So I am going to buy myself a birthday present I think and I believe the time to switch to a mac is upon me. I am lookin for opinions as to which computer you would get based on my needs and uses... (I will be running bootcamp for some applications)



I use my computer for:



Games (Counter-strike, battlefield 20XX (the new one comin out) and a few other first person shooters)

Music

Surfing the web

Office apps for work/grad schol

Poker!

Some video work including use of photoshop



I like to be able to upgrade things such as video cards as they are usually what become obsolete first.



Really my needs point me to the 24" iMac BUT will I be able to get good enough performance out of the graphics card? Can I really upgrade the graphics card as some have said? Am I better off gettin a Mac Pro?



ALSO

Should I wait a few more months to see if any other big system changes occur? Is now the time to buy?? Im not in a HUGE rush to buy - but I would love to start using my new mac



Thank you and ALL opinions are welcome - even negative ones



Jeff
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 30
    both are very new systems and there wont be any changes till atleast macwork in january. honestly. an imac would meet your requirements with the upgraded vid card but you'd be confident of voiding your warranty if you tried to upgrade it yourself.
  • Reply 2 of 30
    Theres a higher video card I could buy other than the one offered?



    Would it be worth it to wait until January?



    Thanks!

    Jeff
  • Reply 3 of 30
    gongon Posts: 2,437member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by sgtpeper


    I use my computer for:



    Games (Counter-strike, battlefield 20XX (the new one comin out) and a few other first person shooters)

    Music

    Surfing the web

    Office apps for work/grad schol

    Poker!

    Some video work including use of photoshop



    I like to be able to upgrade things such as video cards as they are usually what become obsolete first.



    Really my needs point me to the 24" iMac BUT will I be able to get good enough performance out of the graphics card? Can I really upgrade the graphics card as some have said? Am I better off gettin a Mac Pro?



    ALSO

    Should I wait a few more months to see if any other big system changes occur? Is now the time to buy?? Im not in a HUGE rush to buy - but I would love to start using my new mac



    You covered intended use, schedule, and gave a hint of budget, but we don't know what equipment you currently have.



    Don't expect to be able to upgrade the graphics card on the iMac, at all.



    If you only have old hardware that needs to be upgraded anyway, iMac is probably fine. It'll run the current games, not at the full resolution of the screen, but pretty well, and will continue to run games at least two years to the future at small resolutions.



    If you have a display, and a gaming PC that is either current and runs your games, or can be upgraded with a simple graphics card change to do so, I recommend buying a Mac mini alongside it and getting a KVM switch.



    If there is no limit to budget, of course get a Mac Pro. Although it will still have one disadvantage compared to a separate gaming PC - having to reboot to get to your work just isn't fun.



    As usual, the longer you wait the better and cheaper are the alternatives. Updates to the systems you mentioned are far away.
  • Reply 4 of 30
    Eh I havent really set up a budget quite yet.



    I did read a few threads on here about the graphics card being upgradable on the iMac - not sure the validity tho...



    My current PC is a 3.0ghz with HT with a gig of ram and a decent video card.. My monitor is older that moses unfortunately. It's a 19" CRT with burn-in galore. Sooo one way or another it is gettin replaced



    Thanks - does that change your opinion?



    Jeff
  • Reply 5 of 30
    Oooh...Well Ill soon be getting a Mac Pro for almost all the things you do.

    I dont have a budget, and apparently, neither do you, so get a Mac Pro !

    If you wish to run all current games and any (Lets be realistic) games at high/very high for about one year, then get a X1900XT with it.

    And once that card is obsolete, you can get any PC GPU for your Mac Pro (As long as its PCI-E)

    But it wont work in OSX, just in Windows, so when you wish to use OSX, its recommended you will insert your then dated X1900XT inside to run OSX (Or any Current GPU Apple is offering).

    EDIT: Its also recommended you get atleast 2GB of RAM with a Mac Pro (4GB recommended) and a 3GHz Processor.

    EDIT_2: Unfortunatly, due to the switch Apple made to Intel, new Processors will probably be unveiled every 4-6 months in both the Mac Pro and iMac. (Im not sure wether this is good or bad)

    I personally dont see anything big being unveiled until atleast Mac World (January).

    At Mac World I would expect that a speed bump occur (From 3.0 to 3.16) and possibly a new GPU.

    Its also possible that a new GPU may be released during Christmas (But that can (I think) be changed easily by oneself).



    See you on the Battlefield !
  • Reply 6 of 30
    gongon Posts: 2,437member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by sgtpeper


    Eh I havent really set up a budget quite yet.



    I did read a few threads on here about the graphics card being upgradable on the iMac - not sure the validity tho...



    My current PC is a 3.0ghz with HT with a gig of ram and a decent video card.. My monitor is older that moses unfortunately. It's a 19" CRT with burn-in galore. Sooo one way or another it is gettin replaced



    Thanks - does that change your opinion?



    It clarifies my opinion.



    Get a 24" display. Dell has a good one. (Well, a 20" is obviously an option also but compared, say, to the expense of a Mac Pro, a full HD display is a no-brainer.)



    Keep your gaming PC, the processor is plenty fast and if the graphics are not, that can be fixed with a $200 graphics card. (This PC does have PCI Express, does it?) It's the sensible solution, not having to go through, save and put away all your ongoing work and reboot, just to play a game or run other Windows software for a sec. That would suck.



    A basic KVM switch to switch your USB keyboard and mouse between one computer to another. If it has DVI (check that it supports 1920x1200) that is one less button to press while switching, and also opens the way for using an Apple display, which I would not recommend though.



    Computer. Bang for buck? Get the 17" iMac. It is virtually silent, has dual cores and a fast desktop hard drive, is easily upgradable - you could take it with 2GB memory, or 1GB base memory and put in 3GB yourself. It's pretty much as fast as any desktop PC right now. Want more expandability? Get the Mac Pro. No need to get anything besides the basic graphics card, since the PC is handling that. Later on when the gaming PC ages, you have the option of getting the best card that is available for the Mac Pro then, and moving your gaming on that, but probably even then it's better to upgrade the PC. DirectX 10 generation graphics cards might be really slow coming to the Mac, and expensive when they finally do.
  • Reply 7 of 30
    I'd really rather not have 2 computers if I dont need to - that sort of defeats the purpose. After using my step-dads iMac we bought him for his birthday Ive really grown to love mac os and just everything about them.



    That said maybe youre right. Maybe I should just upgrade my video card in my PC (again) add some more ram, and buy a mac book or mac book pro laptop instead.



    I dunno now Im more lost than ever
  • Reply 8 of 30
    Well its up to you, but take it from me...get a Mac Pro
  • Reply 9 of 30
    I just got back from the Apple store. Im really tryin not to get into the super crazy price land. ~2500 would do it..



    Seems to me for bang for the buck the 24" iMac would truly be the best bet.



    Guy told me I wouldnt really notice the difference between the 2.16 and 2.33 and suggested upgrading ram instead. Do you all agree?



    He also said the mac pro would simply be straightup over kill - do you agree with that also?



    Thanks

    Jeff
  • Reply 10 of 30
    Hmm...



    However, with the teachers discount (my mom is a teacher) The difference between a mac pro and an iMac as I would set them up is ~100



    <----Confused all over
  • Reply 11 of 30
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    Get the Mac Pro, because it's a purchase that's virtually impossible to regret.
  • Reply 12 of 30
    ^^What he said

    Overkill is good 8)

    Get a Mac Pro, sell your PC, spend upwards of £4000 and live a happy life !
  • Reply 13 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by sgtpeper


    Hmm...



    However, with the teachers discount (my mom is a teacher) The difference between a mac pro and an iMac as I would set them up is ~100



    <----Confused all over



    Hmm, the Student discount brings the iMac and MacPro within $100 of each other, or makes the MacPro only $100 more than a regular full-priced iMac 24"? If the difference (including a good monitor, Airport Express, etc.) is only $100, it's a no-brainer. The Mac Pro. Period. Man, I wish I new a student...
  • Reply 14 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by sgtpeper


    Hmm...



    However, with the teachers discount (my mom is a teacher) The difference between a mac pro and an iMac as I would set them up is ~100



    <----Confused all over



    What's your Mac Pro config??? Frankly, when I was initially making my decision, I tried to configure a Mac Pro + a new monitor and there's no way they're $100 apart...and I used the educational discount (taking a night class for fun).



    I bought a 24" iMac...no complaints. The machine design is great - as is the new display. I have no concerns from a performance point of view either. It's just a really nice machine. I demoed the iMac this weekend to some of my wife's family, everyone else wants to buy one too!



    I am curious about your Mac Pro config. Do tell.



    --DotComCTO



    P.S. If you're doing a true machine-to-machine exact config and you're only $100 apart, I'd go Mac Pro - no question.
  • Reply 15 of 30
    In the config that was with NO monitor Which does make a difference since my current monitor is older that moses....



    The way I did the mac pro at that prie was basically smallest hd, 2.0ghz, x1900 graphics card, apple care, 1 gig of ram and I think thats it...



    Im still leaning toward the 24" iMac as of now..
  • Reply 16 of 30
    If you had to pick one or the other - which would you get - 2.33 upgraded proccesor or 2gigs of ram in the 24" iMac?
  • Reply 17 of 30
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,326moderator
    I wouldn't go for the iMac. My brother has one and although the GPU is decent, the display is not. I tried a number of games and because it's a widescreen-style display (1650x1050 or something), most games will only let you use 1024x768. Also, the display quality on the iMac doesn't look all that good to me and it shows some bad tearing in fast games. Going from a CRT, I think you'd be disappointed.



    The 24" is close to the lowest Mac Pro (remember the default Mac Pro is not the lowest one you can configure).



    I'm not too keen on the Mac Pro though. The Ram seems expensive and if it's mainly for gaming, the quad processors seem like overkill because it's the GPU that's used more.



    Taking all into consideration, I'd go with the suggestion of getting a Mini and keeping your PC for gaming. Bootcamp is still beta and even if you got it working, you've got to deal with partitioning and rebooting.



    I know you don't want two machines but the Mini is about the size of an external hard drive. You could sit it on top of your tower.



    This way, you can do everything you normally do with your Mac and use the PC like you would a games console. The lowest 1.66 Mini is about 30% slower than the dual 2.16 iMac in terms of CPU so completely reasonable and it's like £400 compared to about £1300.



    It's always good to have two machines so that you have a backup anyway.



    If Apple ever release a mid tower with an upgradable GPU then that could replace all your machines.
  • Reply 18 of 30
    If you dont need one soon I would wait and see if Apple comes out with anything that has a conroe inside... If not go with the iMAC. Mac Pro would be over kill for you.
  • Reply 19 of 30
    Im not sure I agree with the widescreen problem. Most games I play either have widescreen support or you can find widescreen drivers for the game online somewhere
  • Reply 20 of 30
    I'd go with Mac pro as I don't like the iMac's video card aside from the 24".



    As someone who's probably used to upgrading, you're going to hate

    A) having to throw your monitor away with your old computer

    B) not upgrading your video card

    C) heat issues with processor upgrades



    Therefore, I'd go with a stock Mac Pro. It's a better deal on hardware than even homebuilt PCs.
Sign In or Register to comment.