Roadmap reveals next-gen MacBook Pro processor candidates
Intel plans a major boost to its mobile CPUs for their next revision, but may force Apple and other notebook vendors to wait before they can reap the benefits.
Following its disclosure of future Xeons on Tuesday, technology site DailyTech also claims to have obtained preliminary but likely specifications for the next round of portable Core 2 Duo chips.
Rooted in Intel's Penryn technology, the future processors will share the same underpinnings as the Santa Rosa-based chip designs found in today's MacBook Pro systems but will shrink the manufacturing size from 65 nanometers down to 45, simultaneously cooling the processors and clearing room for both a ramp-up of clock speeds as well as more on-chip features.
Unlike the processor revision first released by Intel in May, the Penryn update will emphasize higher speeds over raw efficiency. Although the cheapest processor will climb from 1.8GHz to 2.1GHz, the remaining three chips will be clustered within just 200MHz of each other, launching at 2.4GHz, 2.5GHz, and 2.6GHz. Engineers will instead use Level 2 cache to keep costs in check and will give the two high-end chips 6MB shared between cores, halving the amount for the lesser models.
Intel has already announced that all of the Core 2 Duo revisions will use a new set of instructions named SSE4. These will supply software developers with 54 extra instructions that could lead to faster programs when supported by the right code, the chipmaker says.
But those gains are not imminent, according to the roadmap. Intel does not anticipate shipping the Penryn-based mobile processors until the first quarter of 2008 -- leaving Apple and other notebook vendors without obvious upgrade paths for the second half of 2007.
Intel has released a 2.6GHz mobile Core 2 Extreme as an interim step but is said to be targeting the speed increase at notebooks for enthusiast gamers and at portable workstations. The higher clock rate running on today's 65-nanometer process increases the power draw from 35 to 44 watts and is widely believed to produce too much heat for some thinner notebooks.
Intel said Monday after market close that its second quarter net profits rose 44 percent year-over-year to $1.3 billion, creating $8.7 billion in total revenue thanks both to healthy processor shipments and job cuts.
Following its disclosure of future Xeons on Tuesday, technology site DailyTech also claims to have obtained preliminary but likely specifications for the next round of portable Core 2 Duo chips.
Rooted in Intel's Penryn technology, the future processors will share the same underpinnings as the Santa Rosa-based chip designs found in today's MacBook Pro systems but will shrink the manufacturing size from 65 nanometers down to 45, simultaneously cooling the processors and clearing room for both a ramp-up of clock speeds as well as more on-chip features.
Unlike the processor revision first released by Intel in May, the Penryn update will emphasize higher speeds over raw efficiency. Although the cheapest processor will climb from 1.8GHz to 2.1GHz, the remaining three chips will be clustered within just 200MHz of each other, launching at 2.4GHz, 2.5GHz, and 2.6GHz. Engineers will instead use Level 2 cache to keep costs in check and will give the two high-end chips 6MB shared between cores, halving the amount for the lesser models.
Intel has already announced that all of the Core 2 Duo revisions will use a new set of instructions named SSE4. These will supply software developers with 54 extra instructions that could lead to faster programs when supported by the right code, the chipmaker says.
But those gains are not imminent, according to the roadmap. Intel does not anticipate shipping the Penryn-based mobile processors until the first quarter of 2008 -- leaving Apple and other notebook vendors without obvious upgrade paths for the second half of 2007.
Intel has released a 2.6GHz mobile Core 2 Extreme as an interim step but is said to be targeting the speed increase at notebooks for enthusiast gamers and at portable workstations. The higher clock rate running on today's 65-nanometer process increases the power draw from 35 to 44 watts and is widely believed to produce too much heat for some thinner notebooks.
Intel said Monday after market close that its second quarter net profits rose 44 percent year-over-year to $1.3 billion, creating $8.7 billion in total revenue thanks both to healthy processor shipments and job cuts.
Comments
But those gains are not imminent, according to the roadmap. Intel does not anticipate shipping the Penryn-based mobile processors until the first quarter of 2008 -- leaving Apple and other notebook vendors without obvious upgrade paths for the second half of 2007.
Penryn mobile chips will be available in the first quarter of 2008 (as soon as January?) and if DailyTech is right, Montevina, the successor to the Santa Rosa platform, will be available in Q2 (June 08?).
Expect Intel to refresh Santa Rosa with Penryn-based mobile Core 2 Duo processors in Q1’08 and Montevina to succeed Santa Rosa in Q2’08. […] The next-generation Montevina platform introduces the new Cantiga PM and GM chipsets.
the future processors will share the same underpinnings as the Santa Rosa design
You mean Merom. Santa Rosa is a platform, not a CPU.
Are there not Desktop class processors that were brought down to 45NM as well? I would assume Apple will put a desktop class Processor in the iMac when the heat is down low enough. The shift to 45NM may have accomplished that.
Yes, the desktop CPUs will also come down to 45 nm, probably before the portable ones. However, they will almost certainly use this to increase clock speeds (more than in the laptop space) and bus speeds, resulting in the same power usage and heat generation as the current desktop CPU, Conroe. In other words, the iMac will continue to be a non-portable laptop.
If we're lucky, we get Montevina with Penryn in January, 6 months from now, and 6 months later comes the new Nehalem architecture. It's hard to keep all this stuff straight.
My guess is that the new case design for the MacBook Pro will be introduced at MWSF and it'll sport a CPU that's only 200 MHz faster. It makes me wonder if there's any point in waiting for that. It might be worth waiting for the really new architecture, Nehalem, but that's almost a year out.
The current Santa Rosa MBP is looking better all the time if the bugs have been worked out. Did that firmware update solve the yellowish backlighting? The MBP I saw in the Apple store looked fine.
After Montevina comes Nehalem, the new 45nm platform. So, Montevina for H1 and Nehalem for H2, 2008. If we're lucky, we get Montevina with Penryn in January, 6 months from now, and 6 months later comes the new Nehalem architecture. It's hard to keep all this stuff straight.
Nehalem is the code name for the next microarchitecture and 45nm mobile CPUs, they won't be available until fall 2008 or early 2009.
Nehalem should first be available in the second half of 2008 as Intel talked about "production ramping in 2008, with full production in 2009".
Nehalem is the code name for the next microarchitecture and 45nm mobile CPUs, they won't be available until fall 2008 or early 2009.
Indeed. And with mobile processors launching later more often than not, prepare for a spring 2009 release.
/Adrian
I'm still pretty happy with my 2.33mbp. We'll see what I think once the final leopard is out and I'm working on it every day.
The 2.4 that overtook the 2.33 isn't a ton faster, bit better graphics, and more ram possibilities. I think this 2.33 will last me another 12-24 months easy.
And...?
No one is saying that the best of the last generation is junk and that you have to buy the next one. It's not very often that a computer product revision is so significant that it makes the previous version look like a turtle. There aren't many circumstances that would justify replacing a device that quickly.
Are there not Desktop class processors that were brought down to 45NM as well? I would assume Apple will put a desktop class Processor in the iMac when the heat is down low enough. The shift to 45NM may have accomplished that.
Yes. This is the lineup. Notice the power requirements, and understand that the low voltage parts also are underperforming as well, compared to regular voltage Xeons, by design.
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=8074
I wonder if HSDPA and/or WiMax will finally make it into Intel's next platform.
Supposedly.
Supposedly.
And it was supposed to be in Santa Rosa too. As much I want WiMax to be there I have my doubts.
And it was supposed to be in Santa Rosa too. As much I want WiMax to be there I have my doubts.
It was dropped from Santa Rosa because Intel found a lack of interest back then.
Things have changed since then. By the time it comes out, it could be a different world.
And...?
No one is saying that the best of the last generation is junk and that you have to buy the next one. It's not very often that a computer product revision is so significant that it makes the previous version look like a turtle. There aren't many circumstances that would justify replacing a device that quickly.
The updates lately have been pretty small was my point. I'm not used to laptops being this powerful. It was common for me to have to upgrade all the time with the g4s. It's nice. I'm just happy I bought when I did.
It was a big jump from mbp rev a to mbp rev b. Rev C was a very tiny upgrade in comparison. Having a MBP Rev A is not very future proof with apple pushing for 64bit cocoa apps on leopard.
Let's see if I have this straight. Montevina succeeds Santa Rosa and will support the 45nm Penryn chips. It'll use the Cantiga chipset that has a FSB speed of 1067 MHz and supports 800 MHz DDR3 memory. After Montevina comes Nehalem, the new 45nm platform. So, Montevina for H1 and Nehalem for H2, 2008.
If we're lucky, we get Montevina with Penryn in January, 6 months from now, and 6 months later comes the new Nehalem architecture. It's hard to keep all this stuff straight.
My guess is that the new case design for the MacBook Pro will be introduced at MWSF and it'll sport a CPU that's only 200 MHz faster. It makes me wonder if there's any point in waiting for that. It might be worth waiting for the really new architecture, Nehalem, but that's almost a year out.
The current Santa Rosa MBP is looking better all the time if the bugs have been worked out. Did that firmware update solve the yellowish backlighting? The MBP I saw in the Apple store looked fine.
MacBook Pro was just updated. MWSF should have the Mac Pro update.
Coming up later: "why it's a good idea to look before crossing the road".
My guess is that the new case design for the MacBook Pro will be introduced at MWSF and it'll sport a CPU that's only 200 MHz faster. It makes me wonder if there's any point in waiting for that.
It might be only 200 MHz faster, but it will also have more L2 cache, and SSE4. SSE4 is a big deal for any programs that will make use of it. Finally, it'll consume less power and produce less heat. Higher performance and lower power consumption is why I'm waiting for Penryn. (And hopefully Apple will finally revise the MBP casework at the same time to make replacing the HDD easier).
It might be only 200 MHz faster, but it will also have more L2 cache, and SSE4. SSE4 is a big deal for any programs that will make use of it. Finally, it'll consume less power and produce less heat. Higher performance and lower power consumption is why I'm waiting for Penryn. (And hopefully Apple will finally revise the MBP casework at the same time to make replacing the HDD easier).
There are other speed-ups as well. Without going into all of it, I can say that several instructions have been speeded up as well, some of that is significant.