CBS staying clear of iTunes price war as NBC intros new service

Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited January 2014
CBS Corp. said this week it has no interest in joining the ongoing battle against Apple over the pricing of television shows on its iTunes Store. Meanwhile, ringleader NBC has taken the first step towards launching its own, ad-supported service.



"We're sort of staying out of the battle," CBS chief executive Les Moonves told a Merrill Lynch investor conference on Tuesday. "We like our relationship with iTunes."



Moonves went on to say that iTunes is not a significant source of revenue for CBS, but that the network looks at the Apple download service as much as a promotional means for its shows as a financial vehicle.



Following a standoff in negotiations last month, NBC Universal -- which accounted for 30 percent of iTunes TV show sales -- decided not to renew its agreement with Apple after the iTunes operator declined to allow the TV studio more leeway over the pricing of its content sold through the service.



Although Apple claimed NBC's ultimate goal was to drive the cost of its shows from $1.99 to $4.99 a piece, NBC later disputed the claim, explaining that its intention was to institute "flexibility in wholesale pricing" and bundle shows together in more "attractive" ways.



Said NBC vice president of communications, Cory Shields, "It is clear that Apple?s retail pricing strategy for its iTunes service is designed to drive sales of Apple devices at the expense of those who create the content that make these devices worth buying."



Fox Television content supplier NewsCorp., which had appeared as if it was taking a neutral stance in the matter, later echoed NBC's call for a more flexible iTunes pricing structure, arguing that it should be the ones determining what the fair price for its content is, not Apple.



"We have a pretty limited relationship with Apple and we'll see how it goes," said NewsCorp. chief operating officer and president Peter Chernin. "I assume it will be prickly and dicey and contentious like all negotiations are and like all negotiations should be."



NBC and NewsCorp have stated that they plan to band together to form a new, ad-support online video venture called Hulu later this fall. Though CBS had been invited to join the upstart as a third partner, it declined the offer.



But in an unexpected move on Wednesday that has left more than a few industry watchers scratching their heads, NBC announced plans to also launch its own "NBC Direct" service through NBC.com. The on-demand service (also due this fall) will reportedly offer Heroes, The Office, Life, Bionic Woman, 30 Rock, Friday Night Lights, Late Night with Conan O?Brien, and The Tonight Show with Jay Leno at launch.



In an e-mail release, NBC said the first version of NBC Direct will enter beta testing in October under an ad-supported model, and will cater only to Windows PC users. However, subsequent plans call for a DRM-protected model that will also be compatible with Apple's Mac line.



What's more, NewsCorp. will reportedly follow NBC's lead, and launch its own digital download service in addition to its joint Hulu venture with NBC. The service will compete not only against iTunes, but also NBC Direct and Hulu.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 35
    Hulu sounds totally lulu.
  • Reply 2 of 35
    Wouldn't you know.... Hulu is already being sued by Lulu...



    http://mashable.com/2007/09/05/hulu-lulu/



  • Reply 3 of 35
    What makes these people think all their half-baked solutions will succeed when they watch service after service fail and fold? Sony couldn't do it. Microsoft can't even do it. What makes NBC think they can do it?
  • Reply 4 of 35
    What makes NBC think they can do it?



    Prideful 30-year-old execs!
  • Reply 5 of 35
    jeffdmjeffdm Posts: 12,951member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by grifmx View Post


    What makes NBC think they can do it?



    Prideful 30-year-old execs!



    Maybe you should look up their ages before making such a simplistic claim.
  • Reply 6 of 35
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    NBC Universal -- which accounted for 30 percent of iTunes TV show sales -- decided not to renew its agreement with Apple



    NBC Universal on iTunes equals 30 percent of tv show sales



    NBC Universal on Amazon.com + Hulu + NBC Direct equals hopefully 30 percent of tv show sales...



    Good Luck with that!
  • Reply 7 of 35
    iTunes is a great way to get music in Australia but video has not even started yet. But listening to all that is going on over your way makes me want to buy DVD's that I can rip to my HDD. Really. The quality is better and although it might cost me a few more bucks it is something that I will never loose. Its not that I think Apple is doing anything wrong but the reality is that until the fracturing slows down and starts to converge again to just a couple of video providers I don't want anything to do with digital downloads. Music is different. Many independent artists are easily got from iTunes here so I buy them. But video can wait another decade when it will be HD download, available on my Mac always, downloaded in 10 sec and for some reason no one has worked out how to rip HD DVD or Blue ray. That is when it will be worth getting.



    All this video stuff serves to do is make Apple look fractured as if they are starting to loose the media market. The reality is that iTunes is great to sort your collection of purchased music (either CD or downloaded) and it is far easier in most parts of the world to use Handbrake rip your purchased DVD, sort them on iTunes, watch most of them on my iTV and 32in LCD, and watch a few on my iPod Tubbi.
  • Reply 8 of 35
    s10s10 Posts: 107member
    Ok, so I don't want to watch TV because I HATE publicity and I watch series on iTunes, because it is without advertisements... and NBC thinks I'm going to download stuff with publicity?

    I rather get a TV.
  • Reply 9 of 35
    I pay $1.99 (Apple wants me to pay $0.99 soon) per show, which I own, it never expires, I watch it without ads when I want to watch it. I buy it because I travel a lot and can't carry PVR with me.



    NBC not only wants me to pay for the show, but also they want to include ads just like in TV broadcast (TV broadcasted show is free!) and want to limit my watching time to 1 week per downloaded show.



    PVR records shows for free, I can burn them to DVD, I can keep them as long as I want, I can watch them when I want, I can skip ads.



    Why would I buy from NBC???
  • Reply 10 of 35
    Finally, TV with commercials! I'm so going to use the NBC service. All I've been waiting for is to download commercials on my dime. I mean lets face it commercial free TV is just not the same. Now Broadcasting Commercials, home of the pea-cock.
  • Reply 11 of 35
    What NBC is not realizing is that the allure to the iTunes store for TV and movies is the ability to put those TV shows on your iPod to watch. I've watched many a downloaded TV during my morning and evening commutes. I'm sure as heck not going to lug my laptop around with me when I have the shows recorded on my DVR and can watch them in true HD!
  • Reply 12 of 35
    mcdavemcdave Posts: 1,927member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by JeffDM View Post


    Maybe you should look up their ages before making such a simplistic claim.



    He doesn't have to because he knows you will
  • Reply 13 of 35
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,728member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by kaioslider View Post


    Finally, TV with commercials! I'm so going to use the NBC service. All I've been waiting for is to download commercials on my dime. I mean lets face it commercial free TV is just not the same. Now Broadcasting Commercials, home of the pea-cock.



  • Reply 14 of 35
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,728member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ALPICH View Post


    iTunes is a great way to get music in Australia but video has not even started yet. But listening to all that is going on over your way makes me want to buy DVD's that I can rip to my HDD. Really. The quality is better and although it might cost me a few more bucks it is something that I will never loose. Its not that I think Apple is doing anything wrong but the reality is that until the fracturing slows down and starts to converge again to just a couple of video providers I don't want anything to do with digital downloads. Music is different. Many independent artists are easily got from iTunes here so I buy them. But video can wait another decade when it will be HD download, available on my Mac always, downloaded in 10 sec and for some reason no one has worked out how to rip HD DVD or Blue ray. That is when it will be worth getting.



    All this video stuff serves to do is make Apple look fractured as if they are starting to loose the media market. The reality is that iTunes is great to sort your collection of purchased music (either CD or downloaded) and it is far easier in most parts of the world to use Handbrake rip your purchased DVD, sort them on iTunes, watch most of them on my iTV and 32in LCD, and watch a few on my iPod Tubbi.



    I kind of agree with current resolutions. I do hope Apple offer higher quality soon for the Apple TV ... then the argument is over. Who would rip a 480p DVD if Apple offered 720p? I have my 20 Mb/s FiOS optical fiber download ability waiting Our local DVD store has closed down so it can't happen soon enough for me.
  • Reply 15 of 35
    mcdavemcdave Posts: 1,927member
    I was going to ramble on (as ever) about how TV Networks should look beyond their monolithic approach. The only bit of the whole TV system they don't control is the badge on small window to it sitting in your front room. Other media experiences blossomed but that 'window' started looking a bit old especially as we've been asking to time-shift TV for nearly 30 years. As the 'window' evolves into a whole device eco-system they're paranoid about losing that control and have partnered with one of the least successful players in the consumer media device field (MS) so the consumer is, again, left with having to watch content on sub-standard devices compared to what else is out there.



    I was going to say TV companies need to change their ways but Apple too have to come to the party, they too are showing a monolithic approach. Where are the show bundles inspiring me to send my sky decoder back? Where are the rentals? (most movies & shows are entertaining but aren't 'keepers') Where are the promotional video podcasts with snapshot purchasing in AppleTV/iPod/Computer, Where's are the HiDef content?



    Of course all of this is redundant as I'm in NZ so we have nothing (hopefully the Aussies will convince Apple to think down-under but they seem to be a nation of Apple-haters). The question should be 'where's the global iTS?' I'd like to think they're testing it out on you guys but Apple need to strike back against errant networks by improving the value of their service (get ABC/Disney to release HiDef - the rest will have to follow) I fear iTS video will be dead before it gets here.



    McD
  • Reply 16 of 35
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by amcan View Post


    I pay $1.99 per show, which I own, it never expires, I watch it without ads when I want to watch it. ...



    NBC not only wants me to pay for the show, but also they want to include ads just like in TV broadcast (TV broadcasted show is free!) and want to limit my watching time to 1 week per downloaded show.



    PVR records shows for free, I can burn them to DVD, I can keep them as long as I want, I can watch them when I want, I can skip ads.



    Why would I buy from NBC???



    A Star Wars paraphrase comes to mind:

    "The more you tighten your grip, NBC, the more revenue will slip through your fingers."

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post


    I have my 20 Mb/s FiOS optical fiber download ability waiting



    20Mbps? That's interesting. Who is your FiOS carrier? 20Mbps isn't an option for me. Where I live (near Washington DC), Verizon's FiOS offerings are 5M, 15M and 30M (for $40, $50 and $180/mo, respectively.)



    Next month, when I have time to be home and supervise the installation, I plan on buying the 15M plan. I'm really looking forward to a 10x speedup over my DSL line for the same price.
  • Reply 17 of 35
    vineavinea Posts: 5,585member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by shamino View Post


    A Star Wars paraphrase comes to mind:

    "The more you tighten your grip, NBC, the more revenue will slip through your fingers."

    20Mbps? That's interesting. Who is your FiOS carrier? 20Mbps isn't an option for me. Where I live (near Washington DC), Verizon's FiOS offerings are 5M, 15M and 30M (for $40, $50 and $180/mo, respectively.)



    Next month, when I have time to be home and supervise the installation, I plan on buying the 15M plan. I'm really looking forward to a 10x speedup over my DSL line for the same price.



    Some parts of the FiOS network have newer gear and because of competition from cable they upped plans by 5Mbps. Some parts of N. VA has 10Mbps and 20Mbps service but I don't know where.
  • Reply 18 of 35
    mcdavemcdave Posts: 1,927member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ALPICH View Post


    But video can wait another decade when it will be HD download, available on my Mac always, downloaded in 10 sec and for some reason no one has worked out how to rip HD DVD or Blue ray. That is when it will be worth getting.



    Aren't there Blu-ray rips of Casino Royale all over the torrent sites? I don't need them streamed or instantly available just delivered to my AppleTV with a little blue dot is fine by me.





    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ALPICH View Post


    All this video stuff serves to do is make Apple look fractured as if they are starting to loose the media market. The reality is that iTunes is great to sort your collection of purchased music (either CD or downloaded) and it is far easier in most parts of the world to use Handbrake rip your purchased DVD, sort them on iTunes, watch most of them on my iTV and 32in LCD, and watch a few on my iPod Tubbi.



    The media market is in uncharted waters and the fog banks are rolling in. Apple need to soften up until they have a handle on the video market & the providers need to grow up and realise that 'good' content is highly subjective and if it ain't on the new 'TV' - it ain't on. If they don't get their act together they'll blow it.



    McD
  • Reply 19 of 35
    drblankdrblank Posts: 3,385member
    Who wants ad supported in the first place? Isn't that why people want to pay for these programs in the first place is to not have advertisements?



    Sorry NBC, I think that maybe NBC stands for Nothing But Crap.
  • Reply 20 of 35
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post


    I kind of agree with current resolutions. I do hope Apple offer higher quality soon for the Apple TV ... then the argument is over. Who would rip a 480p DVD if Apple offered 720p? I have my 20 Mb/s FiOS optical fiber download ability waiting Our local DVD store has closed down so it can't happen soon enough for me.



    Fair point. I can see how 720p is so much better than 568 @ 25 frames per second. Ok it really is better. But my issue is that the H.264 codec is absolutely average in fast moving scenes. As I said, I will be sticking to normal DVD's until either Blue Ray or HD-DVD wins and then I will decide if I prefer legal downloads or Purchased movies on media.



    I am sure this argument could keep on going but let me just say that the answer to what is right for what person will probably only be answered once all the options are actually available.
Sign In or Register to comment.