Mozilla Mach-O + Quartz
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/WebObjects/FileSharing.woa/wa/default?user=stevekstevek&templatefn=FileSharing1. html&xmlfn=TKDocument.1.xml&sitefn=RootSite.xml&af f=consumer&cty=US&lang=en" target="_blank">get it here</a>
Lots of stuff missing right now...like command shortcuts and stuff like that, but pretty and fast over-all.
Lots of stuff missing right now...like command shortcuts and stuff like that, but pretty and fast over-all.
Comments
Overall, this is performing better than I expected. My expectations for Mozilla and Chimera have risen immensely today. I was just expecting the patch to apply to the content, but it applies everywhere! I am almost certain without a doubt that they will bury OmniWeb (until we start getting sneakypeeks of 5.0).
I build my own Mach-O Mozillas occasionally and I'm definitely marking that patch for future reference...
Oh, and here's a screenshot for anyone who is hesitant to download and try it:
<a href="http://brad.project-think.com/images/MozillaNotQuartz.png" target="_blank">Without Quartz... yuck.</a>
<a href="http://brad.project-think.com/images/MozillaQuartz.png" target="_blank">With Quartz! Yay!</a> :cool:
[ 04-06-2002: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
Brad, could you take a shot of the browser window in the quartz rendering?
<strong>Awesome.
Brad, could you take a shot of the browser window in the quartz rendering?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I took this grab last night:
CLICK HERE: <a href="http://www.antigen.addr.com/compare2.tiff" target="_blank">http://www.antigen.addr.com/compare2.tiff</A> (400KB tiff, various browser renders in OsX).
Browsers left to right:
Netscape 6.2.2, Quartz Mozilla, Netscape 4.7,
Explorer 5.0, Omniweb 4.1, Chimera 0.9
Anyway, this morning Chimera, err, Navigator 0.2.0 was released and it now usees the ATSUI patch to use Quartz antialiasing. It looks just as good as Mozilla and OmniWeb now.
Excellent!
<a href="http://brad.project-think.com/images/ChimeraSnap003.png" target="_blank">A pic of the new Navigator 0.2.0</a>.
[ 04-06-2002: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>