AT&T to boost 3G speeds more than fivefold by 2009
AT&T said Wednesday it plans to boost the speed of its 3G wireless network to speeds of 20 megabits per second in 2009, paving the way for over-the-air downloads that are more than five times faster than what customers can achieve today.
Speaking at the Morgan Stanley's annual Communications Conference, the company's mobility chief Ralph de la Vega said engineers already have a version of AT&T's HSPA (High Speed Packet Access) 3G network up and running in the labs at speeds of 7.2 megabits per second, or approximately double the theoretical throughput of its existing network.
"It's clear to us that we are in the very early stages of what I would call a wireless data revolution," he said.
AT&T plans to transition to HSPA release 7 sometime in 2009, which will deliver even bigger speeds "exceeding 20 megabits per second," according to the executive. He said the upgrade will require few if any hardware modifications to the company's infrastructure and will instead be a smooth transition achieved largely through a software upgrade to its electronics.
De la Vega also said that his firm has "a clear and logical path" to 700MHz 4G access via the Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard in the 2010 timeframe which should again increase speeds fivefold to nearly 100 megabits per second.
"[The] steps to get there are very logical and they're all building on the same GSM technology that we've been using for a while," he explained. "LTE will allow for backwards compatibility to GSM and HSPA, which is a great benefit to customers. And our path forward to LTE allows us to get there step-by-step, with interim steps that will deliver more and more speeds everyday."
De la Vega was similarly excited about AT&T's growth opportunities in the smart phone market given upcoming handsets from Apple and BlackBerry maker Research In Motion, noting that just 16 percent of the company's postpaid customers currently own integrated devices.
"So upside on further penetration is substantial," he said.
Speaking at the Morgan Stanley's annual Communications Conference, the company's mobility chief Ralph de la Vega said engineers already have a version of AT&T's HSPA (High Speed Packet Access) 3G network up and running in the labs at speeds of 7.2 megabits per second, or approximately double the theoretical throughput of its existing network.
"It's clear to us that we are in the very early stages of what I would call a wireless data revolution," he said.
AT&T plans to transition to HSPA release 7 sometime in 2009, which will deliver even bigger speeds "exceeding 20 megabits per second," according to the executive. He said the upgrade will require few if any hardware modifications to the company's infrastructure and will instead be a smooth transition achieved largely through a software upgrade to its electronics.
De la Vega also said that his firm has "a clear and logical path" to 700MHz 4G access via the Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard in the 2010 timeframe which should again increase speeds fivefold to nearly 100 megabits per second.
"[The] steps to get there are very logical and they're all building on the same GSM technology that we've been using for a while," he explained. "LTE will allow for backwards compatibility to GSM and HSPA, which is a great benefit to customers. And our path forward to LTE allows us to get there step-by-step, with interim steps that will deliver more and more speeds everyday."
De la Vega was similarly excited about AT&T's growth opportunities in the smart phone market given upcoming handsets from Apple and BlackBerry maker Research In Motion, noting that just 16 percent of the company's postpaid customers currently own integrated devices.
"So upside on further penetration is substantial," he said.
Comments
HSPA is already at 14.4Mbit in networks today and HSPA+ 28.8Mbit will be running in many by years end. Still waiting for more devices to catch up to these high speeds that the networks offer. Evolved HSPA 42Mbit will be readily available in many markets before the end of 2009.
HSPA+ also offers 50% increased continuous talk time / internet usage as well as these great increases in speed.
LTE offers speeds of up to 326.4Mbit/s in the downlink and 86.4Mbit uplink in its first release for each 20MHz spectrum slice. The first LTE networks will be operational in 2010.
The contracts for these network upgrades are being awarded with such aggressive time schedules it's amazing.
The Telstra HSPA network in Australia was built in just 10 months from contract to mass launch covering 98 percent of the population, and an average of a base station built every 25 minutes day and night over that period.
Also it's 3GPP release 7 and its called HSPA Evolved.
If in 5-10 years we're still paying for minutes, and getting overage charges, and signing 2-year contracts, and buying software and ringtones and such from these people, it doesn't matter how fast it is, it's going to suck.
Honestly, I don't even care so much about the specific technology used for wireless broadband, I just don't want the fucking cell companies to be the gatekeepers.
If in 5-10 years we're still paying for minutes, and getting overage charges, and signing 2-year contracts, and buying software and ringtones and such from these people, it doesn't matter how fast it is, it's going to suck.
This is why we all love WiMAX but don't know it yet. Its the alternative to the mobile phone hegemony, championed by Intel and one day by the entire computing industry. Phone companies suck really badly.
AT&T said Wednesday it plans to boost the speed of its 3G wireless network to speeds of 20 megabits per second in 2009, paving the way for over-the-air downloads that are more than five times faster than what customers can achieve today.
So what you're saying is that when the network speeds are five times faster, you can download five times faster? I'm shocked.
This is why we all love WiMAX but don't know it yet. Its the alternative to the mobile phone hegemony, championed by Intel and one day by the entire computing industry. Phone companies suck really badly.
Championed by Intel, but run by Sprint....the suckiest phone company of them all. So dont tout WiMax as the savior just yet...
This is why we all love WiMAX but don't know it yet. Its the alternative to the mobile phone hegemony, championed by Intel and one day by the entire computing industry. Phone companies suck really badly.
WiMax has been a up and coming tech for so long now that I have very little interest in it now. I've made money on Clearwire (thank you Melgross) but the numerous deals that have fallen through and the excessive and up and down nature of the stock isn't looking promising.
WiMax has been a up and coming tech for so long now that I have very little concern for it. I've made money on Clearwater (thank you Melgross) but the numerous deals taht have fallen through and the excessive and up and odwn noture of the stock isn't looking promising.
Yeah it takes a long time, but they're still ahead of the GSM people on 4G technology. I think the point is that its being pushed hard by a very large and powerful industry, much bigger and more capable that the phone companies and it will eventually compete with the phone companies and benefit us (the consumers).
"It's clear to us that we are in the very early stages of what I would call a wireless date revolution," he said.
Revolution? I thought a lot of people were already dating wirelessly? I guess the increased bandwidth will allow for on-the-go HD video chats, but that's hardly a revolution...
"So upside on further penetration is substantial," he said.
On second thought...
Revolution? I thought a lot of people were already dating wirelessly? I guess the increased bandwidth will allow for on-the-go HD video chats, but that's hardly a revolution...
Thanks.
K
"a clear and logical path" to 700MHz 4G access via the Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard in the 2010 timeframe
In typical Apple fanboy fashion, I'm eschewing the 3G iPhone and starting the online clamor for the 4G iPhone.
When do you think it will be released? Apple needs to get on their 4G game if they plan on enticing customers. Apple needs to get off their high horse and start work on the 4G iPhone.
If I buy a 3G iPhone this summer, I will sue Apple for tricking me into getting a 3G iPhone when the 4G one is only 2 or 3 years away.
Yeah it takes a long time, but they're still ahead of the GSM people on 4G technology. I think the point is that its being pushed hard by a very large and powerful industry, much bigger and more capable that the phone companies and it will eventually compete with the phone companies and benefit us (the consumers).
They do seem to be ahead in 4G right now, but I wonder if other 4G technology has the potential to be deployed faster and cheaper than WiMax. I guess we'll see shortly, I just hope it's a worldwide standard (or at least a system that is congruent among all national carriers), not the fractured system we currently have.
In typical Apple fanboy fashion, I'm eschewing the 3G iPhone and starting the online clamor for the 4G iPhone.
When do you think it will be released? Apple needs to get on their 4G game if they plan on enticing customers. Apple needs to get off their high horse and start work on the 4G iPhone.
If I buy a 3G iPhone this summer, I will sue Apple for tricking me into getting a 3G iPhone when the 4G one is only 2 or 3 years away.
I'm sure there are some that are already calling HSPA an obsolete tech.
WiMax has been a up and coming tech for so long now that I have very little concern for it. I've made money on Clearwater (thank you Melgross) but the numerous deals taht have fallen through and the excessive and up and odwn noture of the stock isn't looking promising.
I'm pretty sure you meant Clearwire (CLWR)...
Honestly, I don't even care so much about the specific technology used for wireless broadband, I just don't want the fucking cell companies to be the gatekeepers.
If in 5-10 years we're still paying for minutes, and getting overage charges, and signing 2-year contracts, and buying software and ringtones and such from these people, it doesn't matter how fast it is, it's going to suck.
Jay man - don't be depressed like that. Someone NEEDS to provide a network and it aint going to be an NGO, e.V. , ASBL, VZW and whatever else does not a lucrative raison d'etre.
Building a network does cost money, they people who work on the network and for the network do cost money and so forth. Granted they make good money as well. But for third party services the market WILL auto regulate itself
How about getting reliable VOICE COVERAGE on the PA Turnpike? My girlfriend's Verizon Phone had 5/5 bars of EVDO service most of the way from Pittsburgh to Harrisburg, and I was lucky if I had any service at all.
The real questions is what are you doing out there? Who wants to be in Harrisburg or Pittsburgh?
.
.
.
(Sorry, I'm from Philly)
If in 5-10 years we're still paying for minutes, and getting overage charges, and signing 2-year contracts, and buying software and ringtones and such from these people, it doesn't matter how fast it is, it's going to suck.
This is another one of those things I can foresee the iPhone changing. Consider: the 3G iPhone is, by many reports, going to be sold unlocked worldwide except here. Demand here for the unlocked versions will be high so that you can use them on any carrier. As a result, doesn't that mean the flow of iPhones out of the U.S. is going to reverse and start them flowing in? Steve Jobs won't be able to stop that, and as a result you'll get non-AT&T carriers gladly giving you laxer plans so they can steal iPhone business away from AT&T. Don't expect this all to happen overnight, but it'd surprise me if you didn't see movement this way by 2009.