Nokia kicks off Windows Phone 7 campaign with Antennagate teaser spot

Posted:
in iPhone edited January 2014


In an effort to draw attention to its new Lumia branded Windows Phone 7 phones, Nokia has joined AT&T in preparing for a high profile launch, apparently starting with new spots that attempt to resurrect 2010's Antennagate.



An unbranded "Smartphone Beta Test" website, counting down to the launch of Nokia's AT&T debut, fictitiously documents a series of supposed design flaws alluding to the fragility of the iPhone's touch screen and the "death grip" associated with iPhone 4 and its Antennagate issue launched by Gizmodo nearly two years ago.



Other spots, each modeled to look like security camera footage of internal design meetings, highlight flaws with Android phones using OLED screens that only work well inside, creating an overall impression that the smartphone category has been in beta for years, waiting for Microsoft and Nokia to finally release a "non-beta" phone.



Nokia has already launched its Lumia 710 in the US via T-Mobile, but after rapidly falling out of even that carrier's top three phones at the hands of Android competitors, the once leading vendor of smartphones is now hoping to relaunch Lumia in the US with AT&T, a much larger partner.



Without being able to draw attention to the popularity of Windows Phone 7 or a diverse, rich selection of apps for the platform, Nokia appears to be aiming at drawing attention to the real or imagined flaws of its competitors.



Death Grip



Ironically, Nokia's "Death Grip" spot appears to be trying to associate poor antenna performance from "holding it wrong" with iPhone 4, as a tester in the video complains, "shouldn't I be able to hold it however I want?"







Back in 2010, Nokia attempted to make hay from Antennagate by blogging, "providing a wide range of methods and grips for people to hold their phones, without interfering with the antennae, has been an essential feature of every device Nokia has built," and insisting, "you’re free to hold your Nokia device any way you like. And you won’t suffer any signal loss. Cool, huh?"



At the same time, Nokia had long instructed its users to "avoid touching the antenna area unnecessarily while the antenna is transmitting or receiving," and noted in its product manuals that "contact with antennas affects the communication quality and may cause the device to operate at a higher power level than otherwise needed and my reduce the battery life."



Following Nokia's potshots at the iPhone 4's antenna, the company's users posted a variety of videos to YouTube highlighting the same hand-blocking of signal on Nokia's E71, 6230 and 6720 models.











Nokia's similar addressing of OLED screens as a "beta" design mistake are also brow raising, given that the company was among the first to promote OLED screens for use on smartphones, starting with a rebranded Pantech feature phone it attempted to sell in the US back in 2006 as the 6215i; the high end N85 and N86 models it released beginning in 2008 to compete against Apple's iPhone and the newer N8 that was supposed to make Nokia's Symbian a credible contender to iPhone 4.



AT&T has stated its Lumia launch with Nokia will be a "notch above anything we've ever done," powered by another $100 million of advertising pooled by Microsoft among WP7 partners, of whom AT&T has been signed up to give the new Lumia model "hero" status as a heavily promoted device in its retail stores.



Microsoft reportedly allocated $500 million to push WP7 at its launch in late 2010. Its executives also indicated that the company, carriers and manufacturing partners would collectively spend "billions" of dollars marketing WP7 devices during its first year. Those efforts failed to materialize in the form of significant WP7 phone sales however.



According to end of year figures by the NPD Group, Windows Phone's smartphone market share has not topped 2 percent since it launched. Meanwhile, sales of Android and iOS handsets reached a combined 82 percent of the market in the first three quarters of 2011 the firm stated. Nielsen estimated Windows Phone's share of the market for the third quarter of 2011 alone as just 1.2 percent.



Nokia has tied its smartphone strategy to Microsoft's WP7 platform after ditching its own failed experiment with open sourcing the Symbian platform it cultivated over the past decade, and a brief patterning with Intel to create MeeGo as a separate, open platform for smartphones and mobile devices.



[ View article on AppleInsider ]

«134567

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 134
    People who live in glass houses...
  • Reply 2 of 134
    maccherrymaccherry Posts: 924member
    Lame , lame lame.

    I still have the first iPhone 4 and I have never, ever had a dropped call from the so called death grip. And why now. Why bring up this old issue nearly two damn years later?

    Pathetic. Pathetic nokia.
  • Reply 3 of 134
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    1) There are two more of these teaser ads on Nokia's website. I'd say that two are attacking the iPhone, not just the deathgrip ad.



    2) I'm not sure if they are effective as I hear they are confusing if you don't already know the inside story before watching them, but they are funny.



    3) Does the use of SNL's Chris Parnell on their website point to a significant US focus?





    Quote:
    Originally Posted by maccherry View Post


    Lame , lame lame.

    I still have the first iPhone 4 and I have never, ever had a dropped call from the so called death grip. And why now. Why bring up this old issue nearly two damn years later?

    Pathetic. Pathetic nokia.



    1) Campaigns aren't about the truth, it's about using fear and ignorance to sway you. Emotion is a powerful thing and has nothing to with rational thought.



    2) I'm still on my iPhone 4 (returned iPhone 4S because of battery issues). I also haven't been using a Bumper for about a year as I went through several rather quickly.
  • Reply 4 of 134
    popnfreshpopnfresh Posts: 139member
    Resurrecting a 2-year old iPhone controversy that few people remember as part of the ad campaign for your new phone? Did Nokia actually PAY someone to come up with this? This is the dumbest marketing idea I've heard in a long long time.
  • Reply 5 of 134
    That horse was beaten to death, buried, eulogized, and forgotten two years ago.

    So not only is Nokia and Microsoft late to the party, so is their marketing.
  • Reply 6 of 134
    Way to trash your brand.
  • Reply 7 of 134
    cmvsmcmvsm Posts: 204member
    Marketing 101 - Never bring up your competitors, it only takes the spotlight off of your product, and could back fire depending on the consumer. Especially when the competitive issue is two years old and has since been resolved. Nokia has not only ignored those principles, but actually paying someone to do it. I will enjoy seeing them crash and burn.
  • Reply 8 of 134
    swiftswift Posts: 436member
    Like the Zune phone. Can't wait for the Zune to overwhelm that pesky iPod.
  • Reply 9 of 134
    irnchrizirnchriz Posts: 1,616member
    I thought that the new Nokia handsets for wp7 were pretty good and if I was looking for an alternative to ios it would be my first point of call.



    These adverts seem unnecessary as the new nokia handsets looks like a decent product. Maybe they are not confident in it and just need to create click bait vids?
  • Reply 10 of 134
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by cmvsm View Post


    Marketing 101 - Never bring up your competitors, it only takes the spotlight off of your product, and could back fire depending on the consumer. Especially when the competitive issue is two years old and has since been resolved. Nokia has not only ignored those principles, but actually paying someone to do it. I will enjoy seeing them crash and burn.



    That's a great rule but it's not always accurate. For instance, Apple's Get a Mac ads made a point of just saying "PC" never saying Windows even though when they bashed the OS it was clear what they meant. It was only when Windows Vista was deemed a market failure that they decided to do a more open comparison. That is an acceptable usage but you can't do it against the prevailing champion.



    Much like Apple's Get A Mac ads Nokia didn't mention any companies or brands in these ads. Now there is a distinct difference in that these teaser ads also aren't mentioning Nokia, Lumia, MS or Windows Phone. They are also attacking, in at least one ad, a single issue despite the iPhone 4 being exceptionally popular and well loved, whereas with Vista the issues were too general and numerous that the whole brand was tarnished.
  • Reply 11 of 134
    stelligentstelligent Posts: 2,680member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by cmvsm View Post


    Marketing 101 - Never bring up your competitors, it only takes the spotlight off of your product, and could back fire depending on the consumer. Especially when the competitive issue is two years old and has since been resolved. Nokia has not only ignored those principles, but actually paying someone to do it. I will enjoy seeing them crash and burn.



    Guess Apple missed that class.
  • Reply 12 of 134
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by irnchriz View Post


    I thought that the new Nokia handsets for wp7 were pretty good and if I was looking for an alternative to ios it would be my first point of call.



    Me too. It's good enough to replace my iPhone but it's my second choice, along with Nokia's Lumia HW.



    Quote:

    These adverts seem unnecessary as the new nokia handsets looks like a decent product. Maybe they are not confident in it and just need to create click bait vids?



    NasserAE noted that they seem more like MS ads than Nokia ads. I agree. This has MS's fingerprints all over it.
  • Reply 13 of 134
    red oakred oak Posts: 1,087member
    Pathetic. Reminds me of Blackberry's smug "Amateur Hour is Over" effort



    2012 is a big year. We are going to know very soon whether Windows Mobile and Windows 8 tablets are viable. I'm betting that they're not
  • Reply 14 of 134
    stelligentstelligent Posts: 2,680member
    There is no denying that smartphone antennae in general are not as good as those on past feature phones (haven't had a feature phone in some time and so don't know what they are like). There is no denying that past BBs had better reception, in general, than many (most?) current smartphones.



    But what's also true is that smartphones are computers first and phones second (third?). We accept the shortcomings that accompany the greater utility.
  • Reply 15 of 134
    panupanu Posts: 135member
    What is it with this -gate stuff? The Watergate burglary happened almost 40 years ago, and even then, -gate was only the third syllable of the name of the condominium where the burglary happened. Many peoplegate reading this columngate were not even alivegate back then. Isn't it timegate to end the neologismgate with the gategate? Or must everything be written in this dialect of pig Latin?



    Now we have heatgate, antennagate, tyopgate, misspellinggate, paperjamgate, and so on ad nauseam. Can't creative writers think of something creative? Or is this a creativitygate, too?



    To put it in blogger language: We have had a plethora of multiple disparate gategates, and it is time to shutter the practice.
  • Reply 16 of 134
    rabbit_coachrabbit_coach Posts: 1,114member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by astrubhar View Post


    Way to trash your brand.



    After seeing this Adds, who is ever going to buy these phones. The Adds maybe funny for everyone that loves his/her iPhone and/or has followed all the "antennagate", but anybody without this background will be repulsed by this awfully ugly vid.
  • Reply 17 of 134
    paul94544paul94544 Posts: 1,027member
    You are forgeting that not everyone is into tech like you and me. Most people actually have lives and when they see the ads will subconsciously start being the effect it. It is a perfect example of FUD in operation. Apple and all companies do the same thing. It is all a part of fooling (I mean marketing) the public.



    So the next time said consumer is comparison shopping the doubt will be there (even if it is not true) Business is all about perception and that's advertisings job, to influence perception.
  • Reply 18 of 134
    rbonnerrbonner Posts: 635member
    Yeah, no way this can backfire.
  • Reply 19 of 134
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post




    In an effort to draw attention to [...] Lumia 710 in the US via T-Mobile, but after rapidly falling out of even that carrier's top three phones...



    ...




    That's it. History is repeating it self again. I have to stop you there. This is so last year's last.
  • Reply 20 of 134
    nicolbolasnicolbolas Posts: 254member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by EricTheHalfBee View Post


    People who live in glass houses...



    I would be inclined to agree with you, but isn't that a page from a Nokia manual TELLING the user they could mess it up? =.=



    Apple was perfectly fine until they denied it



    Shoulda just said that they had made a mistake and than just fixed it.
Sign In or Register to comment.