Start a moderator review board

Posted:
in Feedback edited January 2014
having recently seen the video of several moderators beating and then slamming down a young AI poster then holding him in a thread lock until he could not reply , has made me very upset.



The doctors say that he may never type in italics again.



it is for this reason that I propose a AI member review board. This board would serve as a watchdog group to determine decisions and policies of Moderators.



This would give the AI community a voice and could consist of sub-commitess such as , the joint sub-commitee for the determination of thread removal (JSUBDTR) or also the Commitee to determine under which heading a topic should be moved to. (CTDUWHATSBM2)



There should also be a hearing process and an appeals process for posters.



ibelieve these changes will make the AI community a much more pleasant and efficient place to express ideas as well as a place to protect us from the minds of those who are determined to be unfit trolling posters.



MSKR esquire

Comments

  • ghost_user_nameghost_user_name Posts: 22,667member
    boy, they'll have a field day with the new guys.



    Rabid dogs, I tell you.



    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
  • alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
    i vote no.
  • jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    [quote]Originally posted by alcimedes:

    <strong>i vote no. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I second that



    J :cool:
  • powerdocpowerdoc Posts: 8,122member
    [quote]Originally posted by Jamie:

    <strong>



    I second that



    J :cool: </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I third that
  • stroszekstroszek Posts: 801member
    It's interesting that only the mods have said no here, not that anyone else has said yes.



    But to give the no's more credibility, i, as a non-mod, also vote no.



    my logic? the acrynoms are too short. if they were longer, we would sound more important, and i would be all about joining up.



    hope that made sense.



    [ 07-19-2002: Message edited by: Stroszek ]</p>
  • vargasvargas Posts: 426member
    In the interests of fairness and democracy I vote yes.
  • ghost_user_nameghost_user_name Posts: 22,667member
    [quote]Originally posted by Vargas:

    <strong>In the interests of fairness and democracy I vote yes.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    It's called sarcasm.
  • macaddictmacaddict Posts: 1,055member
    [quote]It's called sarcasm. <hr></blockquote>



    And I think you just missed it.
  • groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    If you play the tape in reverse you see us help the poster up and send him on his way.



    I'll have my day in court!
  • jonathan brisbyjonathan brisby Posts: 318member
    I agree. This would be a fun idea. So my vote would be yes. (but then this isn't a democracy is it?)
  • powerdocpowerdoc Posts: 8,122member
    [quote]Originally posted by Jonathan Brisby:

    <strong>I agree. This would be a fun idea. So my vote would be yes. (but then this isn't a democracy is it?)</strong><hr></blockquote>



    No it's reversecraty
  • jousterjouster Posts: 460member
    There should be one.....



    The ability to lock/shift threads has gone to some heads.....
  • ghost_user_nameghost_user_name Posts: 22,667member
    [quote]Originally posted by jouster:

    <strong>There should be one.....



    The ability to lock/shift threads has gone to some heads.....</strong><hr></blockquote>





    Who? where? email me.
  • groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    They are tilting at windmills, Jon.



    I've locked 4 threads so far.



    What of my fellow newbie jack-booted thugs, how many have you locked? It must number in the hundreds!
Sign In or Register to comment.