or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Gatorguy

The rumor is either $149 or $199 isn't it?EDIT: according to 9to5
IMO Apple isn't yet ready to close the door for developers who haven't yet gotten around to making the necessary changes or have particular exceptions they need for whatever reason.
I think I remember reading that since Google purchased Boston Dynamics they declined to renew some military contracts. Another of Google's robotics companies, Schaft (LOL, wait for it) is also rejecting military research funding. That would be a good thing to come out of it IMO.
Actually you are Google's customer. Well maybe not YOU. Job #1 is make their services valuable to you. Valuable enough that you choose to be their customer. Remember that search came first. Finding a way to pay for it came secondary to that. If you're not happy with what Google offers you then ad revenue can't follow. Really no different from magazines or newspapers or websites that need to make sure their primary customers, you, enjoy their content so that they can make a...
So do you think they will sue?Personally I think both Apple and Tidal will avoid commenting, or in the case of Tidal commenting further. I suspect there's some grain of truth in there somewhere but not perhaps anything cut and dried, so neither side will want to get into it much.
There is testing going on now using "smartwatch" like wearables for 24-7 monitoring of health conditions, and techs are looking for medical device partners. Regulatory agencies aren't going to be rushed into approvals tho.
She didn't. What she did do was advise Apple (and Samsung) if their primary interest was a speedy trial already scheduled to start in July/2012 then they needed to trim the claims back to their strongest ones. Trying to do it with 30 claims or more in a single lawsuit would seriously delay the jury trial itself up to a year (fact-finding, preliminary objections and responses, claim construction arguments, etc) but they had the right to do so if that was their preference.It...
Open YOUR eyes sir. If she's so biased against Apple or favoring Samsunghow do you explain thisappleinsider.com/articles/14/11/26/judge-rules-apple-entitled-to-potential-ongoing-royalties-from-patent-infringing-samsung-productsor this:http://macdailynews.com/2015/08/05/judge-lucy-koh-rules-for-apple-scuttles-class-action-lawsuit-over-undelivered-texts-to-android-downgraders/or...
Geez, I had no idea how accurate that statement was when I made it. Some of the hardware must be ridiculously cheap already. A "smartwatch" for less than $40?? http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/321807116965?ul_noapp=true&chn=ps&lpid=82http://goo.gl/m7NHJt
:facepalm:The bypass is made available by Apple rather than some Google discovery, and discussed in this Apple technote:https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/ios/technotes/App-Transport-Security-Technote/If Apple "sincerely wants developers to upgrade their apps to be more secure" then why offer a workaround? Is this classic Apple? Nope.
New Posts  All Forums: