or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by neosum

ATT's site has been stalling and timing out so I went to apple and got my order through.
Why can't the voice go over 3g while data go LTE? I thought voice was going through 3g anyway and voice over LTE wasn't ready.
I think it's a very solid upgrade. I love the 4/4s design and this takes it a step further. Faster processor, faster internet, and good battery life. The surprise factor was gone because we all saw the leaks, but I wasn't expecting some new radical form factor. The iphone 5 looks awesome! For those who disagree, that's fine. Just be happy with whatever phone you have because I'll certainly be happy with mine.
That seems to be the case so far. A new form factor came with a new number while internal incremental upgrades came with a letter. The only exception to this pattern was the iphone 3g, which looked like the first iphone (except for the aluminum backing). But from 3 to 4 to 5 (assuming it'll be called 5 with a new form factor), it's been a new number with each new form factor. It doesn't matter what anyone else says or tries to argue. At the end of the day, it is what it...
Get over it.  
Why are people still arguing over the name? Apple obviously have their own reasons for calling it whatever they want and it's their right to do so. Those who continue to insist it's wrong, get over it. You guys are the ones who are wrong. When you own a company and make your own products, you can name it sequentially with its generation number if you want to. Apple is obviously not following your naming scheme.
Yes, I'm saying the iphone 4 being the 4th generation was coincidental and the next iphone could very well be called iphone 5 or whatever Apple wants to call it.   The two iphones before the iphone 4 was named 3 (for whatever reasons I'm not debating). The 4 came after 3 with a new form factor. 5 could come after 4 with a new form factor. It just makes sense if Apple decided to go that path. If they do, then they do. If they don't, then they don't. It doesn't make them...
There's no indication from apple that the name iphone 4 represented the 4th generation. That's just speculation. It could simply mean a form factor change, thus time for a new number indicator. Since the previous form factor was named 3, 4 would come next and it could be coincidental that it also happens to the the 4th generation. Every other generation says otherwise.   I just made up the 4GS portion as an example. G for telephony and S for siri coming out of beta. My...
  The name of the iphone does not imply its generation number. Whatever Apple decides to name the next iphone, it's solely their decision to make. Why do people insist on Apple being "wrong" when it's THEIR products and THEIR naming scheme? The iphone 4s was the 5th generation iphone, yet it wasn't named iphone 5. That alone should answer any uncertainty about whether or not the name of the phone is an indication of its generation number. The next iphone will be named...
  Ofcourse! We all know that the only reason people buy Apple products are because they're iSheep right? Since sheep wouldn't have any clue on how to refund their purchases, Apple ended up having the lowest return rate in the industry. The same sheep then returns to Apple to buy even more Apple products. It makes perfect sense!
New Posts  All Forums: