Nah, it makes it easy. Whenever someone says iTouch , you can go ahead and ignore anything they have say, If they can't get the name right, what are the chances they get the stuff right that actually requires thinking?
Obviously you don't watch an excessive amount of tv like I do, otherwise you too would be overwhelmed by feminine product commercials. Hey, when they originally named it the iPad, you knew these jokes were coming. (notice that I didn't say "good" jokes)
Because to the casual observer, this is outright theft. Nobody likes a thief or wants that thief to go unpunished. I don't understand your point of view, which equates to, "thievery is okay as long as I personally benefit from it." (your benefit in this case is that it gives you the freedom and choice that you desire) I hope this reply is respectful as you requested, I haven't called you any names, I just explained my point of view.
We don't dislike you because you like Samsung or Android. We dislike you because of you're ethically challenged and you lack the basic ability to reason.1) First you admit theft of intellectual propert is unlawful and wrong.2) Then you say you didn't personally steal it so that's okay.Those two statements cannot logically or ethically coexist.Also you say that you wouldn't knowingly buy stolen property - are you invoking "don't ask don't tell"?
I don't understand why it takes so long to get enforcement after the trial. It seems to me that after a verdict is handed down from the jury, that infringing Samsung products should be banned immediately and that Samsung should have to write a check immediately. Why not? They have been found guilty. If after appeal the decision is changed or overturned then Samsung would be entitled to once again sell the products involved and get their money back from Apple. This is...