or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Apple v. Samsung

This is a smart move by hp, however I think that they will still not get the effect they where hopping for. In two months acer will release a 300$ tablet archos will soon release their first licensed android product which will include a sub 300$ tablet and one with a disk harddrive for around 360$. Android has already became a household name people know what it is now, people will prefer an android tablets over an operating system they have never heard of. Hell android by...
Really the virus thing is a joke. Just like windows the average user does not have to worry about viruses. I have only gotten one virus, let me tell you that is with getting two emails from my university telling me I am using to much download bandwidth, one threat from time Warner. To put things into perspective I download alot. Only virus I ever got was on my old blackberry. Never had any issues with windows seven and kepresky (free with my motherboard) or my current...
No one is copying apple. Android is infringing a couple of issues level patents from the 90s that are necessary for the creation of OS, however I am certain that the infringement is so deep its based on the linux kernel which is what android uses. The infringement are not based on iOS because looking like something does not mean you copied it.
Google did not copy iOS. The iphone was great phone but almost noting in it at release was new technology. Most of it was refined but little was new. Apple is infamous for taking other ideas and just improving them and taking credit for being the first with it.
It's based on past history google is not known for being acbully when it comes to patents. Apple sues alot, but microsoft has already shown what they will play the license game against android oem makers they ask from between 5-15$ a unit. Microsoft currently makes more money off of android then they do ofor windows phone 7.
I never said they would have, but they are far less likely to abuse it and more likely to be ridiculously cheap with licenses.
First uh third I have to agree with google on this. I when you don't focus on who won and who lost and you think about what they plan to use the patents for then the story changes. Google spends more energy on developing technology then protecting their parents they are in the technology business not the legal business. Had google won it would have used the patents to defend from legal issues. However the winning group is almost certain to use the patents to place an...
That would be the only good thing this tv will be able to do. As is other televisions do much of the same things as that. The only thing they will be offering new is itunes and airplay. Are you willing to pay that much for itunes and airplay. I myself use a dumb hdtv and I have my ps3 connected to it and I stream music and movies over my home network system. Plus I get better game play then an airplay enabled apple tv.
Apple would release a magical device with a huge pixel density. The people who will purchase this product will be the more ignorant consumers and people who need to own every apple product. The rest of will know that the hdtv market is one of standards, a tv with a high pixel density will be nice but the current standard is less then that which mean you have a tv with no native content.
Google voice, search as you type, Google docs, Google books, youtube, gmail, chrome, and chrome os. Remember that innovate does not mean invent it means to improve on, and yes Google innovates a lot they are one of the most innovative technology companies in the world.
New Posts  All Forums: