or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by snova

MagMan1979, leave it alone. take the high road.    If the fact that Aperture being the #5 highest paid App in the Mac store is not evidence enough to show people are using it, then nothing will be. Don't know why we keep going on about this. Use what works for you and what you like. Not because you think you need to be in the mainstream.  Just because people use Windows more than Mac does not mean I'm gonna switch to Windows. If you think about it, many of us switch from...
can someone summarize Dropbox's business model for me? what is their path to monetization? 
muscle cars used as commuter cars in the city8+MP cameras from tiny sensors in smartphones3/4 ton 4x4 Luxury Pickup trucks w/ leather interiors but w/ unprotected cargo beds (unscratched) riding on low profile tires same kind of customers?
   The see the RAM limitation mostly on my portable. Its a late 2013 rMBP 15" i7 with Nvidia GPU.  As you know the most you can get into any MPB/rMBP laptop is 16GB.  There is definitely a RAM leak, I have to watch my page outs if I intend to spend the whole day in Aperture. Quit out restart if I see it starting to page out drastically.Interesting to hear that the grass is not greener when it comes to RAM with LR. As for len correction, only really need it for my UW. Don't...
Other than requiring a lot of RAM, the tool works well for me.  I have developed a workflow over many years that works very well for me and there is no reason to switch. Of the one notable feature that Aperture lacks (lens correction),  I rarely feel I need lens correction.  When I do; I use PTlens.
I assume you already have Pixelmator?   Does most of what I need.
I have to admit,  I did not read the link at first and as a result Gatorguy rightly so told me to stop asking him annoying questions and just RTF Article.  It stung a little, but he was right. Reading it answered most of my questions and cleared things up.   Gatorguy, my apologies to you.
perhaps... I think more importantly, I don't think this number tells us anything that has much value. At least not that I can figure out why it would be useful. I would think most consumers buying Android or iOS phones don't jailbreak or use third party stores other than OEM. I guess it's nice of Google to scan third party stores downloads and tell users who hack their phones when Google thinks they have downloaded a sneaky app that is on Google's known blacklist. Better...
macaholic_1948,as Gatorguy pointed out the .12% infection rate represents only the hit rate from 1200 known apps from outside of the Google Play store.  What we don't know is how many infected apps have been found in the Google Play store at any point in time.  Something I think which is not in Google's interest to reveal. Of course there is this whole realm of unidentified apps existance in App stores (any app store for that matter Android, iOS, Windows, Mac); no idea how...
That cleared things up. "Google’s security mechanisms have improved Android’s malware defenses and provided Ludwig a platform for collecting and analyzing data from over 1.5 billion app installs." "The research presented by Ludwig includes the classification of the types of threats that are represented in a sample of the 1,200 potentially harmful apps" "Google obtained convincing evidence that the rate of “potentially harmful apps” installed is stable at about 1,200 per...
New Posts  All Forums: