or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by aBeliefSystem

This appleinsider write-up does somewhat look like it is lobbying on behalf of Apple.
So it was back in March that this all happened yet talks were meant to be taking place recently. Weird, though that Foss Patents guy played a big hand in the whole story.
I quite imagine, but for the fact that this is loose change to Apple, negative publicity would have had them pull out of the deal. 3.2 down to 3 is a very very minor revision.
Seems a reverse method of banning others using float like devices. If you can't beat them one way, ban them some another way. I guess it would have been obvious if they put the shutters up on the camera via a patent.
Leak of discussion leak followed by a leak of inflammatory comments. Methinks there was no real discussion, just marketing.
Apple have always been willing to settle. But have you seen the price?
It would be versatile if it worked cross platform. If users were more slow to adopt iMessage would by now have adapted to the real world.
After 3 years do you really think Apple were even half interested in doing in a fix?
That will always be a feature of the walled garden Apple policy. If you want to interact with the outside world then you should learn before quitting. I guess with Apple interfering with SMS, it could be argued that Apple are intentionally undermining a feature of the more open world. They could have made iMessage more world wide web compatible, but it is really there to compete against 'open'.
Makes sense. A slow creep starting with the 4.7" means that when the big phone comes out it looks less like a capitulation to consumer demand.
New Posts  All Forums: