or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by AZREOSpecialist

Maybe the EU should investigate itself for the tax laws it is responsible for passing. Apple is simply following the law in a way to minimize their tax burden. Investigate the politicians and the lobbyists, not the companies that happen to save a lot in taxes simply for following the laws these (and other) clowns passed.
I don't think that works with my Tesla...
Not me. I have no desire to wear a watch. Or glasses. Ever.
This is what Apple just paid billions for? Watch this video and then tell me, why would Apple pay a dime for this individual?  
 Not sure what that means, but okay.
 Ive is good at hardware, not particularly good at UI design, and is not leading any innovation as far as I've seen or read. He is a designer. He doesn't manage the software or decide what happens on the hardware front with new devices. He just makes whatever is decided elsewhere, pretty.
How does everyone feel Iovine and Dre will fit into Apple's corporate culture?
Tim Cook once said that he will never hire a "VP of innovation" because doing so would mean there was a problem at Apple. Well, what do you think he's doing with his recent hires? He is offloading the task of ideation to others and managing the scene. I am a little conflicted about how I feel about this, but then again, Cook's strengths are managerial and not creative. He is not a visionary. Maybe this is what Apple has needed.
 How can it possibly be a win for Samsung if they were found to be infringing? Only in a parallel evil universe is this a win for Samsung. Their products are crap, they can't innovate anything without waiting for Apple to do it first. Apple should plant a manchurian candidate inside of Samsung and detonate the company from within. The world would be a better place without Samshit.
Unfortunately Judge Koh lacks the balls to do what's right.
New Posts  All Forums: