or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by hjb

    If Samsung actually called themselves aApple or their products IFon, then I agree with you.  Or you mean you can not have beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles and onions in your bugger in US?
  Sorry if I offended you.     But then how much Apple wants?  $110 billion is not enough?  How much Apple is investing R&D on their income?  I read somewhere that Samsung is investing tens of billiions every year, but how much by Apple?   Again what exactly Samsung copied Apple?  If Samsung copied (I dont know yet), what Apple has been doing?  Are you sure Apple is not copying.  If yes, how do you know?   Are you saying Samsung is not innovating?
If you look the Samsung digital photo frame marketed in 2006.  It really resembles Galaxy Tab and Ipad.  The frame itself is not unrelated products if you see the specs.  I guess, they developed from the frame when they saw the market which Apple seemed to have created.  The Apple's Ipad design patent does not look like Ipad nor Galaxy Tab.  It really look like Knight Riders tablet (Tablet Newspapers 1994) and a bunch of tablet computers prior to 2004, see the recent UK...
Tell me exactly what Samsung has stolen from Apple.
It is obvious that Samsung had their own designs for Galaxy Tab and Galaxy phones before Apple designs were released.  Their OS is not iOS.  They have very different dimentions in every products than Apple's.  Theirs are made of mainly plastic whereas Apple's glass and aluminum.  So what makes you think that Samsung copied Apple?   I think you have a point in similarities about the accessories and packaging in Samsung products, but are they really serious...
It looks like Apple paid him huge on resignation, on obvious condition that he would not serve the court order in anyway, and shipped him to Hawai.  Very fish.
  And page 2 & 3 of the Samsung brief.     "For good measure, Apple seeks to exclude Samsung from the market, based on its complaints that Samsung has used the very same public domain design concepts that Apple borrowed from other competitors, including Sony, to develop the iPhone. Apple‘s own internal documents show this. In February 2006, before the claimed iPhone design was conceived of, Apple executive Tony Fadell circulated a news article that contained an interview...
There are some interesting details in Samsung's brief.   On page 4&5, it says   "In order to distract from the weakness of its infringement claims, Apple offers misguided allegations of copying that are refuted by evidence of Samsung‘s independent creation. Prior to the iPhone‘s announcement in January 2007, Samsung was already developing numerous products and models with the same design features that Apple now claims were copied from the iPhone. In the summer...
http://www.bgr.com/2012/07/25/samsung-apple-patent-lawsuit-documents-revealed/   It is interesting even in this pro-Apple site.  popcorn ready?
I don't know, but yes I recommend android phones with ics or JB to the capables . What is wrong with that? Am I biased or what?
New Posts  All Forums: