or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by hjb

Galaxy Note is a beatuful and multi functional handset whereas Ipad is a simple and easy-to-use tablet. IMHO, they serve different purposes, hence in different market. Our family use our Galaxy Note on the move. We use it as a media player for our pre-schoolers (does not need any application to play video files), camera (beautiful, we completely replaced our Sony digital camera with it), video camcorder (again, full hd quality with mp4, beautiful), navigator, tablet(no...
I see that you don't have any.
Don't get me wrong. I respond when I need to. In the forum you are referring, I intended to express my experience with our recently purchased Samsung Android phones. I may have crossed line there in your eyes. I did that because some of us here were rubbishing Samsung and Android all together. Based on my experience, they are really good. Back to the topic. Could you post any link that tells Samsung designed, manufactured, marketed or even certified that smartcase...
What? No you have no point, that why I may have not responded.Just present any sources that Samsung designed, marketed or even certified smartcase ripoff. Sure Samsung may want to know that too.
Sorry mate, I have been following this since Apple started, but non of reliable sources said that Samsung designed or made that smartcase lookalike. That one has not even been certified by Samsung. Go and find out yourself.
So your reference was only from 9to5? Where is the article that says Samsung certified that design?
Interesting, where the article come from? I read that that design never been cerrified by Samsung and as soon as Samsung knew it the products were disappeared from the online site. I doubt that any of them had actually been sold. Sure if the smartcase look-a-likes were manufactured and sold by Samsung, Samsung would be penalised in the court, IMO.
Sure, it looks like it, but what Apple really wants? Without it, Samsung would not copy if they copied as Apple claimed.
Apple got design patent on their cases? Really? Patent on cases? Good on them, but I wonder what Apple really wants from this case. IMO, Apple wants to tarnish Samsung as 'Copycat' again but nothing else.
All of the people... have no clue? Dont be stupid. What if the patents Apple registered have flaws in a way that patents should not have been issued. What if Apple is abusing what it seems to be fairer patent systems by bringing this look and feel cases to COURTS? It maybe you who has no clue.
New Posts  All Forums: