New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by hjb

Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta  Most of the evidence that was rejected was rejected because Samsung did not meet the filing deadlines. That's not judicial bias, it's just gross negilgence on the part of Samsung's...
Quote: Originally Posted by anantksundaram  Glad this is giving you a good laugh!     Join in!!   Why not, it is better than the Olympic. Hahaha.  
Quote: Originally Posted by EricTheHalfBee    You have to be kidding, or trolling.   Samsung's lawyers didn't get their evidence admitted because they were late. They've had a year to get...
So, basically all evidence of prior art re Apple patents are excluded by the Judge in the court.  It is simple not fair.  Yes, I think, the Judge has already made herself it to be a mistrial.   Samsung can not...
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil    It's in China. There's nothing they can do.   I thought China is a growing market for Apple.  Even though it is not, Apple should protect its IP...
Here is one of the real knock offs Apple should knock down.  Have a fun everybody.
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60    Of course not, however Apple do own some remarkably detailed design patents, going well beyond a two dimensional front view, which Samsung are likely to have...
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60  Here's the Samsung F700, the way the fandroids don't want you to see it i.e. apart from being rectangular why it is nothing like the iPhone design...
Quote: Originally Posted by b9bot  It's only Apple that is unreasonable. Yet every other company out there who can't make there own products themselves and just steals Apple's R&D are little angels. What a...
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil      Wrong post!. one up mate.
New Posts  All Forums: