New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by FriedLobster

Quote: Originally Posted by Brainless Have you tried to read what I wrote ? Sorry but posting an image of keyboard driven phone doesn't prove Android wasn't capable to work in touch-driven phone (which it was). This was just one of...
Quote: Originally Posted by Cpsro Google = theft + spyware + crummy ads Corrected that for you. thx
Quote: Originally Posted by MacRulez Yep, using celebrities is something Apple would never do. Apple's marketing is backed by innovative products. Google is trying to market a crappy 2nd rate me-too version of Facebook/twitter.
here's the difference my Fandroid friend. Apple = innovation + marketing + distribution Google = Theft + crummy ads Quote: Originally Posted by MacRulez Yep, using celebrities is something Apple would never do.
Quote: Originally Posted by Brainless Great, deep, convincing argument. Congratulations. Sorry i thought you were joking.
Eric Schimdt. Here's Google's track record on innovation. Blogspot = Acquisition / DEAD Youtube = Acquisition / Money-losing operation Gmail = copied from hotmail/yahoo mail/etc. / Money-losing operation Google+ = copied...
Quote: Originally Posted by Brainless Have you seen this : http://www.htc.com/cz/product/chacha/specification.html This is actual Android device, released in 2011. The fact that old photo of android prototype had a thumbnail...
Google's definition of innovation: Google+ has a 'celebrity acquisition plan' http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/soc...google.verify/ ROFL PATHETIC!
Quote: Originally Posted by nickmccally Being an apple fanboy, I am laughing at you guys for defending them trying to coup up a monopoly. If you cant beat em, sue em. Android has far more activations than iOS will have, but there...
Quote: Originally Posted by spliff monkey you mean this case? How could you possibly confuse this with apple's case? How dare you accuse samsung of copying anyone! shameless!
New Posts  All Forums: