Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody
Yeah, I'm really starting to wonder about those Samsung lawyers. This is not "prior art" it's a fantasy product. Even if it were a render of a "concept" it wouldn't be...
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoetmb
Just when I thought patent law couldn't get any more absurd. I've been posting for years that since you don't actually have to produce anything or describe exact methodology, I should have patented...
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone
I thought we had established that all smart phones cost about the same. Where is the 'top end' of which you speak?
Maybe he's referring to the $49.00 3GS?
Quote:
Originally Posted by acslater017
Wow. I still remember when Steve Jobs said that their goal was to have 1% of the market.
Seriously. They have a little over 5% already, way over his number.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
We're just silently laughing at you for not knowing anything about optics. No need to post the same, irrefutable arguments that you'll just ignore.
I know quite well which factors make for a...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody
Both sound hideous to me. I hope this is another erroneous rumour. I sure wouldn't buy anything like that.
C'mon. Steve knows best. You'll slurp it up as soon as it is released.
BTW,...
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOtherGeoff
Isn't there a commandment about that? coveting thy neighbors sexy phone?
"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's ... wife, nor his ass..."
Nothing about his cool Android phone...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDM
It is precise, but only by incredibly low standards of precision. Any context is missing from the headline, so you may as well use a meter stick to measure the thickness of paper and call that precise...
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips
The take on this is quite different at Ars Technical link here http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...ement-case.ars
I'm not sure why you say that. Aside from being much more complete, how...