or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by GregInPrague

Can anyone explain why the y-axis compresses so much at the higher end?  What is the creator of such a graph trying to accomplish with compression like this?  It significantly distorts the immensity of AAPLs growth since 2013.  Is that what the creator is trying to accomplish or is there a less malicious reason for doing something like this with a graph?  
Maybe, but at a minimum protestors should have documentation on them for what is standard and evidence to show that what they were offered is less. Without this basic info they're no better (and likely to be no more successful) than the people who stand on a corner trying to collect for a "good charity" from passersby.
How is an optional Apple Watch feature that helps you not miss taking your medication in any way a negative?? Shouldn't we wish everyone used this and reduced that $300 billion issue of people forgetting needed medication doses and all the dangerous results that can bring about?   This shouldn't be required, but how can you rag on an optional feature?
It's been happening for a few years?? The solution has been out there for at least a couple years. If this is still happening to you it's your own fault.On your suggestion that the decision is California favoritism to Apple you obviously aren't very well read. This same judge was so obviously against Apple in its suits against Samsung, argued before her, that it led plenty of people on AI to say she was showing favoritism to her Korean ethnicity...
As a subtle jab at BB, showing them what they'll never have?
"This means that anyone who analyzed Tuesday's results and still came back with a Watch shipments number under 2 million is being willfully incorrect. Simple extrapolation of the 2 million / 58 days pace gives us 2.15 million"Did you even read the article? These look like facts to me...or do you really consider this opinion?
Didn't Beats have something like $1.5 billion in revenue in 2013? How do you drop Beats plus AppleTV down to 150 million for a quarter in 2015? From what dark hole are you pulling these numbers?
 By that theory shouldn't the US be taxing all global commerce that you seem to think is protected by the US military?
 Is this grammatically incorrect sentence intentionally ironic?  I'm guessing not which makes it even funnier.
Your original comment specifically addressed the tone of the article.  This isn't just a response to a negative spin article, it's unsubstantiated crap made out of whole cloth.  Why shouldn't cheats and liars be pointed out as cheats and liars.  The author, DED, has articles like this pointing out the lies of business journalists more than once a month.  If you've had an AI account for a few years and never read one of those articles you were really avoiding the site...
New Posts  All Forums: