or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by GregInPrague

Only part of Turkey is Europe, a pretty small part. Most of it is Asia. But they are a part of NATO which only has European members plus the USA and they are also pushing for EU membership (don't think it will ever happen).
Why does the title say Chinese and not "China Unicom" preorders?  Isn't China Telecom also selling the device?  I believe they have similar numbers of 3g customers and both are adding approximately 3 million per quarter.  So the true Chinese demand could easily be 600,000 for launch day, no?
  Why would people sell and wait to buy in next year rather than sell and immediately buy back the same day to guarantee their cost basis and have very limited risk of loss?  If you need to save some money for taxes then buy back 90%, but I don't understand the logic for selling to capture the gains strictly for tax purposes but not buying back in immediately.
  I see ancient Trabants all the time in Prague.  I think they're kinda high end for an Android system though. :)   Maybe it could be a feature for those poor people that still want to pimp out there Traby like this one in Budapest....  
Exactly, with 260 shares (more than 1/2 at a margin loss) I got $711 good for 1.31 reinvested shares. While every little bit helps that dividend isn't making many people rich.
How often does Apple slip on company reported release dates? iTunes just slipped a month, but that's not a hardware product and they just canned Forstall.  They've already said supply will be constrained but surely they wouldn't report a HW release if it wasn't a sure thing.  
This doesn't make sense for Samsung from a business perspective.  They need Apple's money.  Apple's already mad at them over the patent infringement and counter lawsuits.  Driving up the prices for them alone will just make Apple more likely to find/create competing chip-makers to take over production for them at the earliest possible moment.     In what way could Samsung benefit from this decision in the long term?
  Who is the owner in this analogy?
Thank you! You've shown clearly that this is a first case for this kind of punishment. You've also show us that the judge is using various unrelated laws to cobble together justification for the result he wanted in the first place. You're questioning Apple appealing more than once? Surely you know there's more than one level of appeal in the American judicial system? There may not be in the UK, but that only speaks additionally to the flaws of their system.
  My response was to your nonsense even more unrelated to facts.    Also please see the previous AI article comments (http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/153785/apples-uk-site-says-samsung-devices-not-as-cool-in-compliance-with-court-ruling) where the following posters & posts insisted that Apple was in contempt of court and should be punished.    Post #11 e_veritas , #21 stike vomit, #47 Lamewing, #52 Galbi, #135 Sensi   The judge did not and will not hold Apple in contempt...
New Posts  All Forums: